迷幻药与慢性神经性疼痛:系统综述。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105532
David S Jevotovsky, Harman Chopra, Daniel J Pak, Shravani Durbhakula, Alexander Shustorovich, Tanya Juneja, Mustafa Y Broachwala, Tariq AlFarra, Caroline Silver, Greg Kreitzer, Philip Oreoluwa, Braden B Weissman, Abraham AlFarra, Brian G Mayrsohn, Vwaire Orhurhu, Trent Emerick, Timothy Furnish, Joel P Castellanos
{"title":"迷幻药与慢性神经性疼痛:系统综述。","authors":"David S Jevotovsky, Harman Chopra, Daniel J Pak, Shravani Durbhakula, Alexander Shustorovich, Tanya Juneja, Mustafa Y Broachwala, Tariq AlFarra, Caroline Silver, Greg Kreitzer, Philip Oreoluwa, Braden B Weissman, Abraham AlFarra, Brian G Mayrsohn, Vwaire Orhurhu, Trent Emerick, Timothy Furnish, Joel P Castellanos","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Chronic pain affects many people globally, requiring alternative management strategies. Psilocybin is gaining attention for its potential in chronic pain management despite being classified as Schedule I.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence for psilocybin, a Schedule I substance, in the treatment of chronic pain. The exact purpose of the review is to assess the impact of psilocybin on chronic pain relief, focusing on dosing protocols, treated conditions, and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted up to January 2024. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating psilocybin for chronic pain management. The risk of bias was assessed using the MASTER (MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research) scale, and the strength of evidence was graded using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The review identified 28 relevant studies focusing on dosing, treated conditions, and outcomes. The majority of the included studies (76.2%) were of low or very low quality. Several studies with moderate-to-low-quality evidence utilized a 0.14 mg/kg dosing protocol. The findings suggest promise for the use of psilocybin in chronic pain relief, though the quality of evidence is generally low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current research shows potential for psilocybin as a treatment option for chronic pain relief. However, methodological issues and a lack of high-quality evidence underscore the need for further investigations with standardized protocols. Despite these limitations, the potential for psilocybin in chronic pain management is encouraging.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023493823.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psilocybin and chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"David S Jevotovsky, Harman Chopra, Daniel J Pak, Shravani Durbhakula, Alexander Shustorovich, Tanya Juneja, Mustafa Y Broachwala, Tariq AlFarra, Caroline Silver, Greg Kreitzer, Philip Oreoluwa, Braden B Weissman, Abraham AlFarra, Brian G Mayrsohn, Vwaire Orhurhu, Trent Emerick, Timothy Furnish, Joel P Castellanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>Chronic pain affects many people globally, requiring alternative management strategies. Psilocybin is gaining attention for its potential in chronic pain management despite being classified as Schedule I.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence for psilocybin, a Schedule I substance, in the treatment of chronic pain. The exact purpose of the review is to assess the impact of psilocybin on chronic pain relief, focusing on dosing protocols, treated conditions, and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted up to January 2024. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating psilocybin for chronic pain management. The risk of bias was assessed using the MASTER (MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research) scale, and the strength of evidence was graded using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The review identified 28 relevant studies focusing on dosing, treated conditions, and outcomes. The majority of the included studies (76.2%) were of low or very low quality. Several studies with moderate-to-low-quality evidence utilized a 0.14 mg/kg dosing protocol. The findings suggest promise for the use of psilocybin in chronic pain relief, though the quality of evidence is generally low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current research shows potential for psilocybin as a treatment option for chronic pain relief. However, methodological issues and a lack of high-quality evidence underscore the need for further investigations with standardized protocols. Despite these limitations, the potential for psilocybin in chronic pain management is encouraging.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023493823.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/重要性:慢性疼痛在全球范围内影响着许多人,需要替代性的管理策略。尽管迷幻药被列为附表 I,但其在慢性疼痛治疗方面的潜力正日益受到关注:本系统综述对治疗慢性疼痛的迷幻药(附表 I 物质)的证据进行了批判性评估。综述的确切目的是评估西洛赛宾对缓解慢性疼痛的影响,重点关注剂量方案、治疗条件和患者疗效:截至 2024 年 1 月,对 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE 进行了全面综述。资格标准包括对治疗慢性疼痛的迷幻药进行评估的研究。采用 MASTER(流行病学研究方法标准)量表评估偏倚风险,并采用 GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评价分级)对证据强度进行分级:审查确定了 28 项相关研究,重点关注剂量、治疗条件和结果。大部分纳入的研究(76.2%)质量较低或很低。几项证据质量为中低的研究采用了 0.14 毫克/千克的剂量方案。研究结果表明,尽管证据质量普遍较低,但使用迷幻药缓解慢性疼痛的前景看好:目前的研究表明,西洛赛宾有可能成为缓解慢性疼痛的一种治疗选择。结论:目前的研究表明,西洛赛宾有可能成为缓解慢性疼痛的治疗选择,但由于方法问题和缺乏高质量的证据,因此需要采用标准化的方案进行进一步的研究。尽管存在这些局限性,但迷幻药治疗慢性疼痛的潜力令人鼓舞:CRD42023493823。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psilocybin and chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review.

Background/importance: Chronic pain affects many people globally, requiring alternative management strategies. Psilocybin is gaining attention for its potential in chronic pain management despite being classified as Schedule I.

Objective: This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence for psilocybin, a Schedule I substance, in the treatment of chronic pain. The exact purpose of the review is to assess the impact of psilocybin on chronic pain relief, focusing on dosing protocols, treated conditions, and patient outcomes.

Evidence review: A comprehensive review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted up to January 2024. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating psilocybin for chronic pain management. The risk of bias was assessed using the MASTER (MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research) scale, and the strength of evidence was graded using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

Findings: The review identified 28 relevant studies focusing on dosing, treated conditions, and outcomes. The majority of the included studies (76.2%) were of low or very low quality. Several studies with moderate-to-low-quality evidence utilized a 0.14 mg/kg dosing protocol. The findings suggest promise for the use of psilocybin in chronic pain relief, though the quality of evidence is generally low.

Conclusions: The current research shows potential for psilocybin as a treatment option for chronic pain relief. However, methodological issues and a lack of high-quality evidence underscore the need for further investigations with standardized protocols. Despite these limitations, the potential for psilocybin in chronic pain management is encouraging.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023493823.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. KDM4A facilitates neuropathic pain and microglial M1 polarization by regulating BDNF in a rat model of brachial plexus avulsion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1