针对使用胰岛素泵治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的闭环胰岛素疗法:一项为期 12 周的多中心、开放标签、随机对照、交叉试验。

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-0623
Anne-Laure Borel, Sandrine Lablanche, Christine Waterlot, Eloïse Joffray, Céline Barra, Nathalie Arnol, Hafid Amougay, Pierre-Yves Benhamou
{"title":"针对使用胰岛素泵治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的闭环胰岛素疗法:一项为期 12 周的多中心、开放标签、随机对照、交叉试验。","authors":"Anne-Laure Borel, Sandrine Lablanche, Christine Waterlot, Eloïse Joffray, Céline Barra, Nathalie Arnol, Hafid Amougay, Pierre-Yves Benhamou","doi":"10.2337/dc24-0623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0-84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0-70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0-22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1778-1786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy for People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With an Insulin Pump: A 12-Week Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Laure Borel, Sandrine Lablanche, Christine Waterlot, Eloïse Joffray, Céline Barra, Nathalie Arnol, Hafid Amougay, Pierre-Yves Benhamou\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-0623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0-84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0-70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0-22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1778-1786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在2型糖尿病患者中,连续血糖监测(CGM)与连续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)相结合比多次注射疗法能更好地控制血糖。研究设计和方法:研究目的是测量混合闭环设备(DBLG1)与CSII+CGM相比对曾接受过CSII治疗的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。这项随机、对照、交叉、两阶段、开放标签和多中心研究于 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 7 月在 17 人(9 人先接受 6 周 CSII + CGM 治疗,8 人先接受 6 周闭环治疗)中进行。主要终点是血糖在范围内的时间百分比(TIR:70-180 mg/dL)。次要结果是其他 CGM 血糖指标、体力活动和使用 1 周动测法客观测量的睡眠:采用改良的意向治疗法对数据进行了分析。平均年龄为 63 岁(SD 9),35% 为女性。纳入时的平均 HbA1c 为 7.9% (SD 0.9)。在闭环条件下,TIR 上升至 76.0%(四分位间范围 69.0-84.0),而在 CSII + CGM 条件下,TIR 上升至 61.0%(四分位间范围 55.0-70.0);平均差异为 15.0 个百分点(四分位间范围 8.0-22.0;P < 0.001)。对次要终点的分析表明,超过量程的时间减少了,血糖管理指标降低了,血糖变异性降低了,每日胰岛素剂量增加了。动觉睡眠分析显示,在闭环疗法期间,睡眠片段有所改善:闭环疗法对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的改善程度高于 CSII + CGM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy for People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With an Insulin Pump: A 12-Week Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population.

Research design and methods: The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry.

Results: Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0-84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0-70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0-22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment.

Conclusions: Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arterial Stiffness Is Related to Diabetes-Associated Microvascular Complications: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance. Flying With Type 1 Diabetes as Commercial Airline Pilots in the U.S.: The Sky Is the Limit for People With Type 1 Diabetes. Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry. Longitudinal Determination of Diabetes Complications and Other Clinical Variables as Risk Factors for Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1