{"title":"初次患糖尿病酮症酸中毒的猫急性患者生理和实验室评估评分及其他预后因素。","authors":"Yael Ad, Rebecka S. Hess","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) scores have not been reported in cats with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>In cats with DKA, APPLE scores will be significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors and these scores will predict mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-eight cats with DKA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective study. The APPLE scores, blood glucose concentration (BG), venous pH, and ketone concentrations were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Simple logistic regression was used to determine if these variables predict the binary variable of survival or non-survival, and if they did, an empirical optimal cut point for mortality prediction was calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> and APPLE<sub>full</sub> scores were significantly higher in non-survivors (30 cats; <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>24.6</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>7.4</mn>\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>45.2</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>7.3</mn>\n </mrow></math>, respectively) compared with survivors (38 cats; <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>20.9</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>6.2</mn>\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>41.7</mn>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>6.5</mn>\n </mrow></math>; <i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> = .02, respectively). The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> (<i>P</i> = .03) but not the APPLE<sub>full</sub> scores (<i>P</i> = .06) predicted mortality. For every 1 unit increase in the APPLE<sub>fast</sub> score, the odds of death increased by 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006-1.17; <i>P</i> = .03). Median BG was significantly higher in non-survivors (431 mg/dL; range, 260-832 mg/dL) compared with survivors (343 mg/dL; range, 256-738 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = .01) and BG predicted mortality (<i>P</i> = .02). For every 1 mg/dL increase in BG, the odds of death increased by 1.004 (95% CI, 1.0006-1.008). Empirical optimal cut points for APPLE<sub>fast</sub> and BG mortality prediction were 24.5 and 358 mg/dL, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> score and BG predict mortality in cats with DKA and can be used to stratify populations by risk of mortality in clinical trials of DKA in cats.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.17151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feline acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation scores and other prognostic factors in cats with first-time diabetic ketoacidosis\",\"authors\":\"Yael Ad, Rebecka S. Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.17151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) scores have not been reported in cats with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>In cats with DKA, APPLE scores will be significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors and these scores will predict mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-eight cats with DKA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective study. The APPLE scores, blood glucose concentration (BG), venous pH, and ketone concentrations were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Simple logistic regression was used to determine if these variables predict the binary variable of survival or non-survival, and if they did, an empirical optimal cut point for mortality prediction was calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> and APPLE<sub>full</sub> scores were significantly higher in non-survivors (30 cats; <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>24.6</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>7.4</mn>\\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>45.2</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>7.3</mn>\\n </mrow></math>, respectively) compared with survivors (38 cats; <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>20.9</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>6.2</mn>\\n </mrow></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>41.7</mn>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mn>6.5</mn>\\n </mrow></math>; <i>P</i> = .01 and <i>P</i> = .02, respectively). The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> (<i>P</i> = .03) but not the APPLE<sub>full</sub> scores (<i>P</i> = .06) predicted mortality. For every 1 unit increase in the APPLE<sub>fast</sub> score, the odds of death increased by 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006-1.17; <i>P</i> = .03). Median BG was significantly higher in non-survivors (431 mg/dL; range, 260-832 mg/dL) compared with survivors (343 mg/dL; range, 256-738 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = .01) and BG predicted mortality (<i>P</i> = .02). For every 1 mg/dL increase in BG, the odds of death increased by 1.004 (95% CI, 1.0006-1.008). Empirical optimal cut points for APPLE<sub>fast</sub> and BG mortality prediction were 24.5 and 358 mg/dL, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The APPLE<sub>fast</sub> score and BG predict mortality in cats with DKA and can be used to stratify populations by risk of mortality in clinical trials of DKA in cats.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.17151\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.17151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.17151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feline acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation scores and other prognostic factors in cats with first-time diabetic ketoacidosis
Background
Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) scores have not been reported in cats with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Hypothesis
In cats with DKA, APPLE scores will be significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors and these scores will predict mortality.
Animals
Sixty-eight cats with DKA.
Methods
Retrospective study. The APPLE scores, blood glucose concentration (BG), venous pH, and ketone concentrations were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Simple logistic regression was used to determine if these variables predict the binary variable of survival or non-survival, and if they did, an empirical optimal cut point for mortality prediction was calculated.
Results
The APPLEfast and APPLEfull scores were significantly higher in non-survivors (30 cats; and , respectively) compared with survivors (38 cats; and ; P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). The APPLEfast (P = .03) but not the APPLEfull scores (P = .06) predicted mortality. For every 1 unit increase in the APPLEfast score, the odds of death increased by 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006-1.17; P = .03). Median BG was significantly higher in non-survivors (431 mg/dL; range, 260-832 mg/dL) compared with survivors (343 mg/dL; range, 256-738 mg/dL; P = .01) and BG predicted mortality (P = .02). For every 1 mg/dL increase in BG, the odds of death increased by 1.004 (95% CI, 1.0006-1.008). Empirical optimal cut points for APPLEfast and BG mortality prediction were 24.5 and 358 mg/dL, respectively.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
The APPLEfast score and BG predict mortality in cats with DKA and can be used to stratify populations by risk of mortality in clinical trials of DKA in cats.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.