表扬和 "简单 "反馈对儿童的坚持和自我评价的影响。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106032
Grace Bennett-Pierre , Taylor Chernuta , Rawan Altamimi , Elizabeth A. Gunderson
{"title":"表扬和 \"简单 \"反馈对儿童的坚持和自我评价的影响。","authors":"Grace Bennett-Pierre ,&nbsp;Taylor Chernuta ,&nbsp;Rawan Altamimi ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Gunderson","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Praise is thought to affect children’s responses to failure, yet other potentially impactful messages about effort have been rarely studied. We experimentally investigated the effects of praise and “easy” feedback after success on children’s persistence and self-evaluations after failure. Children (<em>N</em> = 150; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 7.97 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.58) from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States (73 girls; 79% White) heard one of five types of feedback from an experimenter after success on online tangram puzzles: process praise (“You must have worked hard on that puzzle”), person praise (“You must be good at puzzles”), process-easy feedback (“It must have been easy to rotate and fit those pieces together”), person-easy feedback (“It must have been an easy puzzle for you”), or a control. Next, children failed to complete a harder tangram puzzle. Preregistered primary analyses revealed no differences in persistence and self-evaluation between person and process praise or between person-easy and process-easy feedback. Exploratory analyses showed that hearing process praise led to greater persistence after failure than the control condition (<em>d</em> = .61) and that process-easy feedback led to greater strategy generation than the control condition. The effects of adult feedback after success may be more context dependent than previously thought.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 106032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of praise and “easy” feedback on children’s persistence and self-evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Grace Bennett-Pierre ,&nbsp;Taylor Chernuta ,&nbsp;Rawan Altamimi ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Gunderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Praise is thought to affect children’s responses to failure, yet other potentially impactful messages about effort have been rarely studied. We experimentally investigated the effects of praise and “easy” feedback after success on children’s persistence and self-evaluations after failure. Children (<em>N</em> = 150; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 7.97 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.58) from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States (73 girls; 79% White) heard one of five types of feedback from an experimenter after success on online tangram puzzles: process praise (“You must have worked hard on that puzzle”), person praise (“You must be good at puzzles”), process-easy feedback (“It must have been easy to rotate and fit those pieces together”), person-easy feedback (“It must have been an easy puzzle for you”), or a control. Next, children failed to complete a harder tangram puzzle. Preregistered primary analyses revealed no differences in persistence and self-evaluation between person and process praise or between person-easy and process-easy feedback. Exploratory analyses showed that hearing process praise led to greater persistence after failure than the control condition (<em>d</em> = .61) and that process-easy feedback led to greater strategy generation than the control condition. The effects of adult feedback after success may be more context dependent than previously thought.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001723\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们认为表扬会影响儿童对失败的反应,但对其他可能影响努力的信息却很少进行研究。我们通过实验研究了成功后的表扬和 "轻松 "反馈对儿童失败后的坚持和自我评价的影响。儿童(人数 = 150;年龄 = 7.97 岁,标准差 = 0.58)(73 名女孩;79% 为白人)在成功完成在线七巧板拼图后听到了实验人员提供的五种反馈中的一种:过程表扬("你一定很努力地完成了这道拼图")、个人表扬("你一定很擅长拼图")、过程轻松反馈("旋转和拼接这些拼图一定很容易")、个人轻松反馈("这道拼图对你来说一定很容易")或对照组。接下来,孩子们未能完成更难的七巧板拼图。预先登记的主要分析表明,人际表扬和过程表扬之间,以及人际轻松反馈和过程轻松反馈之间,在坚持性和自我评价方面没有差异。探索性分析表明,与对照组相比,听到过程性表扬会使学生在失败后更能坚持(d = .61),而与对照组相比,过程性反馈会使学生产生更多的策略。成功后成人反馈的效果可能比之前认为的更依赖于情境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of praise and “easy” feedback on children’s persistence and self-evaluations

Praise is thought to affect children’s responses to failure, yet other potentially impactful messages about effort have been rarely studied. We experimentally investigated the effects of praise and “easy” feedback after success on children’s persistence and self-evaluations after failure. Children (N = 150; Mage = 7.97 years, SD = 0.58) from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States (73 girls; 79% White) heard one of five types of feedback from an experimenter after success on online tangram puzzles: process praise (“You must have worked hard on that puzzle”), person praise (“You must be good at puzzles”), process-easy feedback (“It must have been easy to rotate and fit those pieces together”), person-easy feedback (“It must have been an easy puzzle for you”), or a control. Next, children failed to complete a harder tangram puzzle. Preregistered primary analyses revealed no differences in persistence and self-evaluation between person and process praise or between person-easy and process-easy feedback. Exploratory analyses showed that hearing process praise led to greater persistence after failure than the control condition (d = .61) and that process-easy feedback led to greater strategy generation than the control condition. The effects of adult feedback after success may be more context dependent than previously thought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Children plan manual actions similarly in structured tasks and in free play Editorial Board Concurrent and predictive associations between executive function and numerical skills in early childhood Examining methodological influences on the rhythmic priming effect: A commentary on Kim, McLaren, and Lee (2024) Parenting relationships as a moderator of how socioeconomic status and household chaos relate to children’s cognitive and socioemotional skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1