成年后血压的教育不平等:一项为期 20 年的跟踪研究提供的证据。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1177/14034948241261966
Mihretab Gebreslassie, Marie Warolén, Anton Lager, Stefan Fors
{"title":"成年后血压的教育不平等:一项为期 20 年的跟踪研究提供的证据。","authors":"Mihretab Gebreslassie, Marie Warolén, Anton Lager, Stefan Fors","doi":"10.1177/14034948241261966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>High blood pressure (BP) is a key contributor to the burden of disease. This study aimed to assess: a) educational differences across the entire BP distribution, and b) educational differences in the trajectories of BP across the adult life course.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Longitudinal data from the Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Program was analysed using quantile regression and linear mixed effects models. Models were adjusted for age, sex, lifestyle, and BP medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower educational level was associated with higher systolic BP (SBP) at all follow-up periods. Age and sex adjusted mean SBP was 2.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 3.87), 3.95 (95% CI 2.45, 5.45) and 2.61 (95% CI 1.09, 4.13) mmHg higher for people with pre-secondary education compared with post-secondary at baseline, 10 years and 20 years follow-up, respectively. Quantile regressions revealed that the inequalities could be observed across the entire BP continuum. Longitudinally analysed, people with pre-secondary education had 3.01 (95% CI 1.91-4.11) mmHg higher SBP than those with post-secondary education, age and sex adjusted. No significant convergence or divergence of the educational gaps in SBP was observed. Educational differences remained even after adjusting for lifestyle and BP medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>These results imply that public health interventions should aim to bring about distributional shifts in blood pressure, rather than exclusively focusing on hypertensive people, if they are to effectively minimize the educational disparities in blood pressure and its consequences.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational inequalities in blood pressure across the adult life course: Evidence from a 20-year follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Mihretab Gebreslassie, Marie Warolén, Anton Lager, Stefan Fors\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948241261966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>High blood pressure (BP) is a key contributor to the burden of disease. This study aimed to assess: a) educational differences across the entire BP distribution, and b) educational differences in the trajectories of BP across the adult life course.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Longitudinal data from the Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Program was analysed using quantile regression and linear mixed effects models. Models were adjusted for age, sex, lifestyle, and BP medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower educational level was associated with higher systolic BP (SBP) at all follow-up periods. Age and sex adjusted mean SBP was 2.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 3.87), 3.95 (95% CI 2.45, 5.45) and 2.61 (95% CI 1.09, 4.13) mmHg higher for people with pre-secondary education compared with post-secondary at baseline, 10 years and 20 years follow-up, respectively. Quantile regressions revealed that the inequalities could be observed across the entire BP continuum. Longitudinally analysed, people with pre-secondary education had 3.01 (95% CI 1.91-4.11) mmHg higher SBP than those with post-secondary education, age and sex adjusted. No significant convergence or divergence of the educational gaps in SBP was observed. Educational differences remained even after adjusting for lifestyle and BP medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>These results imply that public health interventions should aim to bring about distributional shifts in blood pressure, rather than exclusively focusing on hypertensive people, if they are to effectively minimize the educational disparities in blood pressure and its consequences.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241261966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241261966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高血压是造成疾病负担的一个主要因素。本研究旨在评估:a)整个血压分布中的教育差异;b)成年后血压变化轨迹中的教育差异:方法:使用量值回归和线性混合效应模型对斯德哥尔摩糖尿病预防计划的纵向数据进行分析。结果:教育程度越低,血压越高:结果:在所有随访期间,教育程度越低,收缩压(SBP)越高。经年龄和性别调整后,在基线、10 年和 20 年随访期间,与大专学历者相比,大专学历者的平均收缩压分别高出 2.49(95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.10,3.87)、3.95(95% CI 2.45,5.45)和 2.61(95% CI 1.09,4.13)毫米汞柱。量子回归显示,在整个血压连续体中都能观察到不平等现象。纵向分析显示,经年龄和性别调整后,受过中等教育前教育的人的 SBP 比受过中等教育后教育的人高 3.01(95% CI 1.91-4.11)毫米汞柱。在 SBP 的教育差距方面,没有观察到明显的趋同或差异。即使对生活方式和降压药进行调整,教育程度的差异依然存在: 这些结果表明,公共卫生干预措施应着眼于实现血压分布的变化,而不是仅仅关注高血压患者,这样才能有效缩小血压及其后果方面的教育差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Educational inequalities in blood pressure across the adult life course: Evidence from a 20-year follow-up study.

Aim: High blood pressure (BP) is a key contributor to the burden of disease. This study aimed to assess: a) educational differences across the entire BP distribution, and b) educational differences in the trajectories of BP across the adult life course.

Method: Longitudinal data from the Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Program was analysed using quantile regression and linear mixed effects models. Models were adjusted for age, sex, lifestyle, and BP medication.

Results: Lower educational level was associated with higher systolic BP (SBP) at all follow-up periods. Age and sex adjusted mean SBP was 2.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 3.87), 3.95 (95% CI 2.45, 5.45) and 2.61 (95% CI 1.09, 4.13) mmHg higher for people with pre-secondary education compared with post-secondary at baseline, 10 years and 20 years follow-up, respectively. Quantile regressions revealed that the inequalities could be observed across the entire BP continuum. Longitudinally analysed, people with pre-secondary education had 3.01 (95% CI 1.91-4.11) mmHg higher SBP than those with post-secondary education, age and sex adjusted. No significant convergence or divergence of the educational gaps in SBP was observed. Educational differences remained even after adjusting for lifestyle and BP medication.

Conclusions: These results imply that public health interventions should aim to bring about distributional shifts in blood pressure, rather than exclusively focusing on hypertensive people, if they are to effectively minimize the educational disparities in blood pressure and its consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Self-reported body function and daily life activities 18 months after Covid-19: A nationwide cohort study Strict Danes or relaxed Swedes? Comparing health and daily activities in Sweden and Denmark during the Covid-19 pandemic Associations between non-registered ultrasound examination in pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes in immigrant and non-immigrant women: a Norwegian population-based study 1999–2016 Occupational prestige and future sickness absence and disability pension in women and men: a Swedish nationwide prospective cohort study. Perspectives on connecting climate change and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1