通过对生存结果的回顾性分析,为接受过单次和多次 SBRT 治疗的头颈癌肺部转移患者制定了新的预后评分 (HAMP)。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1002/hed.27913
Samuel M Vorbach, Thomas Seppi, Manuel P Sarcletti, Siegfried Kollotzek, Julian Mangesius, Jens Lehmann, David Riedl, Martin J Pointner, Matthias Santer, Daniel Dejaco, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Ute Ganswindt
{"title":"通过对生存结果的回顾性分析,为接受过单次和多次 SBRT 治疗的头颈癌肺部转移患者制定了新的预后评分 (HAMP)。","authors":"Samuel M Vorbach, Thomas Seppi, Manuel P Sarcletti, Siegfried Kollotzek, Julian Mangesius, Jens Lehmann, David Riedl, Martin J Pointner, Matthias Santer, Daniel Dejaco, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Ute Ganswindt","doi":"10.1002/hed.27913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report on the characterization and introduction of a novel prognostic score for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of single and multiple pulmonary metastases (PMs) derived from head and neck cancer (HNC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we examined selected factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among 59 patients with HNC treated with SBRT for a total of 118 PMs, between 2009 and 2023. Factors related to survival were included in the prognostic scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prognostic factors including histology, age, number of metastases, and performance status at first SBRT were weighted differently depending on the strength of correlation to PFS and OS. Total prognostic scores (HAMP) ranged from 13 to 24 points, with a cut-off total score of ≤18 scoring points for patients in a high-risk (HR) subcohort, and of ≥19 scoring points for patients in a low-risk group (LR). Median PFS (23.8 vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.001) and OS (61.3 vs. 16.4 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HAMP score might be a convenient tool to facilitate individualized treatment decisions and appropriate follow-up. The accuracy and reliability of the score requires further evaluation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel prognostic score (HAMP) for head and neck cancer patients with single and multiple SBRT-treated lung metastases derived from retrospective analyses of survival outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel M Vorbach, Thomas Seppi, Manuel P Sarcletti, Siegfried Kollotzek, Julian Mangesius, Jens Lehmann, David Riedl, Martin J Pointner, Matthias Santer, Daniel Dejaco, Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel, Ute Ganswindt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report on the characterization and introduction of a novel prognostic score for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of single and multiple pulmonary metastases (PMs) derived from head and neck cancer (HNC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we examined selected factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among 59 patients with HNC treated with SBRT for a total of 118 PMs, between 2009 and 2023. Factors related to survival were included in the prognostic scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prognostic factors including histology, age, number of metastases, and performance status at first SBRT were weighted differently depending on the strength of correlation to PFS and OS. Total prognostic scores (HAMP) ranged from 13 to 24 points, with a cut-off total score of ≤18 scoring points for patients in a high-risk (HR) subcohort, and of ≥19 scoring points for patients in a low-risk group (LR). Median PFS (23.8 vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.001) and OS (61.3 vs. 16.4 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HAMP score might be a convenient tool to facilitate individualized treatment decisions and appropriate follow-up. The accuracy and reliability of the score requires further evaluation in prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们报告了对接受立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)治疗头颈部癌症(HNC)单发和多发肺转移瘤(PMs)患者的特征描述和新型预后评分的引入:在这项回顾性研究中,我们对2009年至2023年期间接受SBRT治疗的59例HNC患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行了研究。与生存相关的因素被纳入预后评分系统:预后因素包括组织学、年龄、转移灶数量和首次SBRT时的表现状态,根据与PFS和OS的相关性,这些因素的权重有所不同。预后总分(HAMP)从13分到24分不等,高风险(HR)亚群患者的临界总分≤18分,低风险组(LR)患者的临界总分≥19分。中位生存期(23.8 个月 vs. 5.5 个月),PHAMP 评分可能是促进个体化治疗决策和适当随访的便捷工具。该评分的准确性和可靠性需要在前瞻性研究中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel prognostic score (HAMP) for head and neck cancer patients with single and multiple SBRT-treated lung metastases derived from retrospective analyses of survival outcome.

Background: We report on the characterization and introduction of a novel prognostic score for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of single and multiple pulmonary metastases (PMs) derived from head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined selected factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among 59 patients with HNC treated with SBRT for a total of 118 PMs, between 2009 and 2023. Factors related to survival were included in the prognostic scoring system.

Results: Prognostic factors including histology, age, number of metastases, and performance status at first SBRT were weighted differently depending on the strength of correlation to PFS and OS. Total prognostic scores (HAMP) ranged from 13 to 24 points, with a cut-off total score of ≤18 scoring points for patients in a high-risk (HR) subcohort, and of ≥19 scoring points for patients in a low-risk group (LR). Median PFS (23.8 vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.001) and OS (61.3 vs. 16.4 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group.

Conclusion: The HAMP score might be a convenient tool to facilitate individualized treatment decisions and appropriate follow-up. The accuracy and reliability of the score requires further evaluation in prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1