将有效性作为社会必要条件的八种方法。

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-07-12 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.77727
Mélanie Marceau, Meredith Young, Frances Gallagher, Christina St-Onge
{"title":"将有效性作为社会必要条件的八种方法。","authors":"Mélanie Marceau, Meredith Young, Frances Gallagher, Christina St-Onge","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Validity as a social imperative foregrounds the social consequences of assessment and highlights the importance of building quality into the assessment development and monitoring processes. <i>Validity as a social imperative</i> is informed by current assessment trends such as programmatic-, longitudinal-, and rater-based assessment, and is one of the conceptualizations of validity currently at play in the Health Professions Education (HPE) literature. This Black Ice is intended to help readers to get a grip on how to embed principles of <i>validity as a social imperative</i> in the development and quality monitoring of an assessment. This piece draws on a program of work investigating <i>validity as a social imperative</i>, key HPE literature, and data generated through stakeholder interviews. We describe eight ways to implement validation practices that align with <i>validity as a social imperative</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative.\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Marceau, Meredith Young, Frances Gallagher, Christina St-Onge\",\"doi\":\"10.36834/cmej.77727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Validity as a social imperative foregrounds the social consequences of assessment and highlights the importance of building quality into the assessment development and monitoring processes. <i>Validity as a social imperative</i> is informed by current assessment trends such as programmatic-, longitudinal-, and rater-based assessment, and is one of the conceptualizations of validity currently at play in the Health Professions Education (HPE) literature. This Black Ice is intended to help readers to get a grip on how to embed principles of <i>validity as a social imperative</i> in the development and quality monitoring of an assessment. This piece draws on a program of work investigating <i>validity as a social imperative</i>, key HPE literature, and data generated through stakeholder interviews. We describe eight ways to implement validation practices that align with <i>validity as a social imperative</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效性是社会的需要,它强调了评估的社会后果,并强调了在评估开发和监测过程中建立质量的重要性。评估的有效性是社会的需要,它受到当前评估趋势的影响,如基于项目、纵向和评分者的评估,也是当前健康职业教育(HPE)文献中关于有效性的概念之一。这篇 "黑冰 "旨在帮助读者掌握如何将效度原则作为一项社会要求嵌入到评估的开发和质量监控中。这篇文章借鉴了将有效性作为一项社会责任的研究计划、主要的 HPE 文献以及通过利益相关者访谈获得的数据。我们介绍了八种符合社会责任有效性的验证方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eight ways to get a grip on validity as a social imperative.

Validity as a social imperative foregrounds the social consequences of assessment and highlights the importance of building quality into the assessment development and monitoring processes. Validity as a social imperative is informed by current assessment trends such as programmatic-, longitudinal-, and rater-based assessment, and is one of the conceptualizations of validity currently at play in the Health Professions Education (HPE) literature. This Black Ice is intended to help readers to get a grip on how to embed principles of validity as a social imperative in the development and quality monitoring of an assessment. This piece draws on a program of work investigating validity as a social imperative, key HPE literature, and data generated through stakeholder interviews. We describe eight ways to implement validation practices that align with validity as a social imperative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Everything new is happening all at once": a qualitative study of early career obstetrician and gynaecologists' preparedness for independent practice. Walk with a Future Doc program allows Canadian medical students to promote physical activity and health education in local communities. 'What would my peers say?' Comparing the opinion-based method with the prediction-based method in Continuing Medical Education course evaluation. Centring equity in medicine: pushback to challenging power. Educational approaches for social accountability in health professions training: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1