{"title":"用于中心静脉导管插入术的中层和表层颈丛神经阻滞的比较","authors":"Murat Sevim, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Betul Kozanhan","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the superficial cervical plexus (SCP) and ultrasonography (USG)-guided intermediate cervical plexus (ICP) blocks for patient and operator satisfaction during central venous catheterisation (CVC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the ICP and SCP block groups before CVC. Patients received 10ml of a local anaesthesia. Pain levels were assessed during needle insertion, dilation, catheter insertion, and suturing, and 5 minutes after the procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Thirty minutes post-procedure, patient and operator satisfaction were evaluated using a 5-point Likert-type scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICP block group had lower mean pain scores than the SCP block group during needle entry, dilation, and 5 minutes after CVC (p = 0.022, p <0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in pain scores after the block application, during catheter insertion, and suturing (p = 0.279, p = 0.052, and p = 0.072, respectively). Patient and operator satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.189 and p = 0.329, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that the ICP and SCP blocks resulted in comparable patient and operator satisfaction levels during CVC. Given that the ICP block resulted in lower pain scores at various stages of the procedure, it is a recommended method to enhance overall patient comfort and minimise the pain during CVC.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Central venous catheterisation, Intermediate cervical plexus block, Superficial cervical plexus block, Patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 8","pages":"869-873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Intermediate and Superficial Cervical Plexus Blocks for Central Venous Catheterisation.\",\"authors\":\"Murat Sevim, Mahmut Sami Tutar, Betul Kozanhan\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the superficial cervical plexus (SCP) and ultrasonography (USG)-guided intermediate cervical plexus (ICP) blocks for patient and operator satisfaction during central venous catheterisation (CVC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the ICP and SCP block groups before CVC. Patients received 10ml of a local anaesthesia. Pain levels were assessed during needle insertion, dilation, catheter insertion, and suturing, and 5 minutes after the procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Thirty minutes post-procedure, patient and operator satisfaction were evaluated using a 5-point Likert-type scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICP block group had lower mean pain scores than the SCP block group during needle entry, dilation, and 5 minutes after CVC (p = 0.022, p <0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in pain scores after the block application, during catheter insertion, and suturing (p = 0.279, p = 0.052, and p = 0.072, respectively). Patient and operator satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.189 and p = 0.329, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that the ICP and SCP blocks resulted in comparable patient and operator satisfaction levels during CVC. Given that the ICP block resulted in lower pain scores at various stages of the procedure, it is a recommended method to enhance overall patient comfort and minimise the pain during CVC.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Central venous catheterisation, Intermediate cervical plexus block, Superficial cervical plexus block, Patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"869-873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Intermediate and Superficial Cervical Plexus Blocks for Central Venous Catheterisation.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the superficial cervical plexus (SCP) and ultrasonography (USG)-guided intermediate cervical plexus (ICP) blocks for patient and operator satisfaction during central venous catheterisation (CVC).
Study design: Experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, between May and July 2022.
Methodology: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the ICP and SCP block groups before CVC. Patients received 10ml of a local anaesthesia. Pain levels were assessed during needle insertion, dilation, catheter insertion, and suturing, and 5 minutes after the procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Thirty minutes post-procedure, patient and operator satisfaction were evaluated using a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Results: The ICP block group had lower mean pain scores than the SCP block group during needle entry, dilation, and 5 minutes after CVC (p = 0.022, p <0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in pain scores after the block application, during catheter insertion, and suturing (p = 0.279, p = 0.052, and p = 0.072, respectively). Patient and operator satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.189 and p = 0.329, respectively).
Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the ICP and SCP blocks resulted in comparable patient and operator satisfaction levels during CVC. Given that the ICP block resulted in lower pain scores at various stages of the procedure, it is a recommended method to enhance overall patient comfort and minimise the pain during CVC.