在欧洲的长期实验中,降低耕作强度并不会增加丛枝菌根真菌的多样性

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13546
Tanel Vahter, Astrid R. Taylor, Blanca B. Landa, Deborah Linsler, Engracia Maria Madejon Rodriguez, Francisco Giron Moreno, Guénola Pérès, Ilka Engell, Inga Hiiesalu, Jan Bengtsson, Jane Oja, Kaisa A. Torppa, Luis F. Arias-Giraldo, Gema Guzmán, Martin Potthoff, Martti Vasar, Mignon Sandor, Siim-Kaarel Sepp, Vlad Stoian, Maarja Öpik
{"title":"在欧洲的长期实验中,降低耕作强度并不会增加丛枝菌根真菌的多样性","authors":"Tanel Vahter,&nbsp;Astrid R. Taylor,&nbsp;Blanca B. Landa,&nbsp;Deborah Linsler,&nbsp;Engracia Maria Madejon Rodriguez,&nbsp;Francisco Giron Moreno,&nbsp;Guénola Pérès,&nbsp;Ilka Engell,&nbsp;Inga Hiiesalu,&nbsp;Jan Bengtsson,&nbsp;Jane Oja,&nbsp;Kaisa A. Torppa,&nbsp;Luis F. Arias-Giraldo,&nbsp;Gema Guzmán,&nbsp;Martin Potthoff,&nbsp;Martti Vasar,&nbsp;Mignon Sandor,&nbsp;Siim-Kaarel Sepp,&nbsp;Vlad Stoian,&nbsp;Maarja Öpik","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mechanical soil disturbance is one among the key factors influencing soil biodiversity in agriculture. Although many soil organisms are sensitive to soil disturbance, fungi could be highly impacted due to their sessile lifestyle, relatively slow growth and filamentous body structure. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are of particular interest in arable lands, providing crop plants with numerous vital services such as nutrient acquisition and protection against abiotic and biotic stressors. Considering this, tillage practices that aim to reduce soil disturbance are often seen as a fungal-friendly alternative to conventional inversion tillage. Although local studies exist on the impacts of minimal tillage practices on AM fungi, the universality of this approach has been debated. Our objective was to assess the effects of reduced tillage intensity on AM fungi in comparison with conventional tillage. Using high-throughput sequencing techniques in long-term field experiments in five European countries, we show that the effects of reduced tillage intensity may not necessarily be positive on soil AM fungal diversity. Plots which were tilled using reduced tillage techniques had lower AM fungal richness in three countries, whereas in one of them, no significant differences were found. We also observed a shift in AM fungal communities where prevalence of taxa preferring root colonisation rather than soil exploration increased under reduced tillage regimes. Here, we argue that more detailed and long-term studies are needed to understand the factors that could make the reduction of soil disturbance more beneficial to AM fungi if agricultural sustainability goals are to be met.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced tillage intensity does not increase arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in European long-term experiments\",\"authors\":\"Tanel Vahter,&nbsp;Astrid R. Taylor,&nbsp;Blanca B. Landa,&nbsp;Deborah Linsler,&nbsp;Engracia Maria Madejon Rodriguez,&nbsp;Francisco Giron Moreno,&nbsp;Guénola Pérès,&nbsp;Ilka Engell,&nbsp;Inga Hiiesalu,&nbsp;Jan Bengtsson,&nbsp;Jane Oja,&nbsp;Kaisa A. Torppa,&nbsp;Luis F. Arias-Giraldo,&nbsp;Gema Guzmán,&nbsp;Martin Potthoff,&nbsp;Martti Vasar,&nbsp;Mignon Sandor,&nbsp;Siim-Kaarel Sepp,&nbsp;Vlad Stoian,&nbsp;Maarja Öpik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.13546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mechanical soil disturbance is one among the key factors influencing soil biodiversity in agriculture. Although many soil organisms are sensitive to soil disturbance, fungi could be highly impacted due to their sessile lifestyle, relatively slow growth and filamentous body structure. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are of particular interest in arable lands, providing crop plants with numerous vital services such as nutrient acquisition and protection against abiotic and biotic stressors. Considering this, tillage practices that aim to reduce soil disturbance are often seen as a fungal-friendly alternative to conventional inversion tillage. Although local studies exist on the impacts of minimal tillage practices on AM fungi, the universality of this approach has been debated. Our objective was to assess the effects of reduced tillage intensity on AM fungi in comparison with conventional tillage. Using high-throughput sequencing techniques in long-term field experiments in five European countries, we show that the effects of reduced tillage intensity may not necessarily be positive on soil AM fungal diversity. Plots which were tilled using reduced tillage techniques had lower AM fungal richness in three countries, whereas in one of them, no significant differences were found. We also observed a shift in AM fungal communities where prevalence of taxa preferring root colonisation rather than soil exploration increased under reduced tillage regimes. Here, we argue that more detailed and long-term studies are needed to understand the factors that could make the reduction of soil disturbance more beneficial to AM fungi if agricultural sustainability goals are to be met.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13546\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13546\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤机械扰动是影响农业土壤生物多样性的关键因素之一。虽然许多土壤生物对土壤扰动都很敏感,但真菌由于其无梗生活方式、相对缓慢的生长速度和丝状体结构,可能会受到很大影响。丛枝菌根(AM)真菌在耕地中尤其受到关注,它为作物植物提供了许多重要服务,如获取养分、抵御非生物和生物压力等。有鉴于此,旨在减少土壤扰动的耕作方法往往被视为传统翻耕的真菌友好型替代方法。虽然当地有关于最小耕作方法对 AM 真菌影响的研究,但这种方法的普遍性一直存在争议。我们的目标是评估与传统耕作相比,降低耕作强度对 AM 真菌的影响。我们在五个欧洲国家的长期田间试验中使用了高通量测序技术,结果表明,降低耕作强度不一定会对土壤中的AM真菌多样性产生积极影响。在三个国家,采用减耕技术耕作的地块AM真菌丰富度较低,而在其中一个国家则没有发现显著差异。我们还观察到 AM 真菌群落发生了变化,在减少耕作制度下,更喜欢根部定殖而非土壤探索的类群数量有所增加。在此,我们认为,如果要实现农业可持续发展的目标,就需要进行更详细、更长期的研究,以了解减少土壤扰动对AM真菌更有利的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduced tillage intensity does not increase arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in European long-term experiments

Mechanical soil disturbance is one among the key factors influencing soil biodiversity in agriculture. Although many soil organisms are sensitive to soil disturbance, fungi could be highly impacted due to their sessile lifestyle, relatively slow growth and filamentous body structure. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are of particular interest in arable lands, providing crop plants with numerous vital services such as nutrient acquisition and protection against abiotic and biotic stressors. Considering this, tillage practices that aim to reduce soil disturbance are often seen as a fungal-friendly alternative to conventional inversion tillage. Although local studies exist on the impacts of minimal tillage practices on AM fungi, the universality of this approach has been debated. Our objective was to assess the effects of reduced tillage intensity on AM fungi in comparison with conventional tillage. Using high-throughput sequencing techniques in long-term field experiments in five European countries, we show that the effects of reduced tillage intensity may not necessarily be positive on soil AM fungal diversity. Plots which were tilled using reduced tillage techniques had lower AM fungal richness in three countries, whereas in one of them, no significant differences were found. We also observed a shift in AM fungal communities where prevalence of taxa preferring root colonisation rather than soil exploration increased under reduced tillage regimes. Here, we argue that more detailed and long-term studies are needed to understand the factors that could make the reduction of soil disturbance more beneficial to AM fungi if agricultural sustainability goals are to be met.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends A GSD‐driven approach to deriving stochastic soil strength parameters under hybrid machine learning models Further reduction in soil bacterial diversity under severe acidification in European temperate forests Effect of brackish water inundation on temperate coastal acid sulfate soils under different vegetation types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1