食品和药品管理局人类食品计划对食品供应中添加物质的监管。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755
Jennifer L Pomeranz, Emily M Broad Leib, Dariush Mozaffarian
{"title":"食品和药品管理局人类食品计划对食品供应中添加物质的监管。","authors":"Jennifer L Pomeranz, Emily M Broad Leib, Dariush Mozaffarian","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US food supply is increasingly associated with diet-related diseases, toxicity, cancer, and other health harms. These public health concerns are partly attributable to a loophole in federal law. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates the premarket safety of ingredients regulated as food additives but allows the food industry to self-regulate and determine which substances to classify as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) based on undisclosed data and conclusions that the FDA never sees. Furthermore, the FDA lacks a formal approach for reviewing food additives and GRAS substances already found in the food supply. Substances in the food supply thus include innocuous ingredients (e.g., black pepper), those that are harmful at high levels (e.g., salt), those that are of questionable safety (e.g., potassium bromate), and those that are unknown to the FDA and the public. A recent court decision codified these gaps in the FDA's current approach, leaving states to try to fill the regulatory void. The FDA and Congress should consider several policy options to ensure that the FDA is meeting its mission to ensure a safe food supply. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2024;114(10):1061-1070. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of Added Substances in the Food Supply by the Food and Drug Administration Human Foods Program.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Pomeranz, Emily M Broad Leib, Dariush Mozaffarian\",\"doi\":\"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US food supply is increasingly associated with diet-related diseases, toxicity, cancer, and other health harms. These public health concerns are partly attributable to a loophole in federal law. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates the premarket safety of ingredients regulated as food additives but allows the food industry to self-regulate and determine which substances to classify as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) based on undisclosed data and conclusions that the FDA never sees. Furthermore, the FDA lacks a formal approach for reviewing food additives and GRAS substances already found in the food supply. Substances in the food supply thus include innocuous ingredients (e.g., black pepper), those that are harmful at high levels (e.g., salt), those that are of questionable safety (e.g., potassium bromate), and those that are unknown to the FDA and the public. A recent court decision codified these gaps in the FDA's current approach, leaving states to try to fill the regulatory void. The FDA and Congress should consider several policy options to ensure that the FDA is meeting its mission to ensure a safe food supply. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2024;114(10):1061-1070. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of public health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的食品供应越来越多地与饮食相关疾病、毒性、癌症和其他健康危害联系在一起。这些公众健康问题部分归因于联邦法律中的一个漏洞。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对作为食品添加剂的配料进行上市前安全性评估,但允许食品行业进行自我监管,并根据未公开的数据和结论决定将哪些物质列为公认安全物质(GRAS),而 FDA 从未看到这些数据和结论。此外,美国食品和药物管理局缺乏审查食品添加剂和已在食品供应中发现的 GRAS 物质的正式方法。因此,食品供应中的物质包括无害成分(如黑胡椒)、高浓度有害成分(如食盐)、安全性有问题的成分(如溴酸钾)以及食品及药物管理局和公众未知的成分。最近的一项法院判决将食品及药物管理局现行方法中的这些漏洞编纂成法律,让各州尝试填补监管空白。食品及药物管理局和国会应考虑几种政策选择,以确保食品及药物管理局履行其确保安全食品供应的使命。(Am J Public Health.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulation of Added Substances in the Food Supply by the Food and Drug Administration Human Foods Program.

The US food supply is increasingly associated with diet-related diseases, toxicity, cancer, and other health harms. These public health concerns are partly attributable to a loophole in federal law. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates the premarket safety of ingredients regulated as food additives but allows the food industry to self-regulate and determine which substances to classify as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) based on undisclosed data and conclusions that the FDA never sees. Furthermore, the FDA lacks a formal approach for reviewing food additives and GRAS substances already found in the food supply. Substances in the food supply thus include innocuous ingredients (e.g., black pepper), those that are harmful at high levels (e.g., salt), those that are of questionable safety (e.g., potassium bromate), and those that are unknown to the FDA and the public. A recent court decision codified these gaps in the FDA's current approach, leaving states to try to fill the regulatory void. The FDA and Congress should consider several policy options to ensure that the FDA is meeting its mission to ensure a safe food supply. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1061-1070. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307755).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Health Disparities and Sexual Orientation Response Choices Used in Two US National Population-Based Health Surveys, 2020‒2021. Bridging the Gap: Aligning Education for Public Health With Emerging Workforce Demands. Mastheads. Subscription Form. Table of Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1