台湾的疫苗犹豫不决:由有影响力的用户塑造的回声室的多层时空网络研究。

Jason Dean-Chen Yin
{"title":"台湾的疫苗犹豫不决:由有影响力的用户塑造的回声室的多层时空网络研究。","authors":"Jason Dean-Chen Yin","doi":"10.2196/55104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a growing global health threat that is increasingly studied through the monitoring and analysis of social media platforms. One understudied area is the impact of echo chambers and influential users on disseminating vaccine information in social networks. Assessing the temporal development of echo chambers and the influence of key users on their growth provides valuable insights into effective communication strategies to prevent increases in vaccine hesitancy. This also aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) infodemiology research agenda, which aims to propose new methods for social listening.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using data from a Taiwanese forum, this study aims to examine how engagement patterns of influential users, both within and across different COVID-19 stances, contribute to the formation of echo chambers over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study come from a Taiwanese forum called PTT. All vaccine-related posts on the \"Gossiping\" subforum were scraped from January 2021 to December 2022 using the keyword \"vaccine.\" A multilayer network model was constructed to assess the existence of echo chambers. Each layer represents either provaccination, vaccine hesitant, or antivaccination posts based on specific criteria. Layer-level metrics, such as average diversity and Spearman rank correlations, were used to measure chambering. To understand the behavior of influential users-or key nodes-in the network, the activity of high-diversity and hardliner nodes was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the provaccination and antivaccination layers are strongly polarized. This trend is temporal and becomes more apparent after November 2021. Diverse nodes primarily participate in discussions related to provaccination topics, both receiving comments and contributing to them. Interactions with the antivaccination layer are comparatively minimal, likely due to its smaller size, suggesting that the forum is a \"healthy community.\" Overall, diverse nodes exhibit cross-cutting engagement. By contrast, hardliners in the vaccine hesitant and antivaccination layers are more active in commenting within their own communities. This trend is temporal, showing an increase during the Omicron outbreak. Hardliner activity potentially reinforces their stances over time. Thus, there are opposing forces of chambering and cross-cutting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts should be made to moderate hardliner and influential nodes in the antivaccination layer and to support provaccination users engaged in cross-cutting exchanges. There are several limitations to this study. One is the bias of the platform used, and another is the lack of a comprehensive definition of \"influence.\" To address these issues, comparative studies across different platforms can be conducted, and various metrics of influence should be explored. Additionally, examining the impact of influential users on network structure and chambering through network simulations and regression analysis provides more robust insights. The study also lacks an explanation for the reasons behind chambering trends. Conducting content analysis can help to understand the nature of engagement and inform interventions to address echo chambers. These approaches align with and further the WHO infodemic research agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"16 ","pages":"e55104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine Hesitancy in Taiwan: Temporal, Multilayer Network Study of Echo Chambers Shaped by Influential Users.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Dean-Chen Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/55104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a growing global health threat that is increasingly studied through the monitoring and analysis of social media platforms. One understudied area is the impact of echo chambers and influential users on disseminating vaccine information in social networks. Assessing the temporal development of echo chambers and the influence of key users on their growth provides valuable insights into effective communication strategies to prevent increases in vaccine hesitancy. This also aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) infodemiology research agenda, which aims to propose new methods for social listening.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using data from a Taiwanese forum, this study aims to examine how engagement patterns of influential users, both within and across different COVID-19 stances, contribute to the formation of echo chambers over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study come from a Taiwanese forum called PTT. All vaccine-related posts on the \\\"Gossiping\\\" subforum were scraped from January 2021 to December 2022 using the keyword \\\"vaccine.\\\" A multilayer network model was constructed to assess the existence of echo chambers. Each layer represents either provaccination, vaccine hesitant, or antivaccination posts based on specific criteria. Layer-level metrics, such as average diversity and Spearman rank correlations, were used to measure chambering. To understand the behavior of influential users-or key nodes-in the network, the activity of high-diversity and hardliner nodes was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the provaccination and antivaccination layers are strongly polarized. This trend is temporal and becomes more apparent after November 2021. Diverse nodes primarily participate in discussions related to provaccination topics, both receiving comments and contributing to them. Interactions with the antivaccination layer are comparatively minimal, likely due to its smaller size, suggesting that the forum is a \\\"healthy community.\\\" Overall, diverse nodes exhibit cross-cutting engagement. By contrast, hardliners in the vaccine hesitant and antivaccination layers are more active in commenting within their own communities. This trend is temporal, showing an increase during the Omicron outbreak. Hardliner activity potentially reinforces their stances over time. Thus, there are opposing forces of chambering and cross-cutting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts should be made to moderate hardliner and influential nodes in the antivaccination layer and to support provaccination users engaged in cross-cutting exchanges. There are several limitations to this study. One is the bias of the platform used, and another is the lack of a comprehensive definition of \\\"influence.\\\" To address these issues, comparative studies across different platforms can be conducted, and various metrics of influence should be explored. Additionally, examining the impact of influential users on network structure and chambering through network simulations and regression analysis provides more robust insights. The study also lacks an explanation for the reasons behind chambering trends. Conducting content analysis can help to understand the nature of engagement and inform interventions to address echo chambers. These approaches align with and further the WHO infodemic research agenda.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"e55104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/55104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疫苗犹豫不决是一个日益严重的全球健康威胁,通过对社交媒体平台的监测和分析,对这一问题的研究日益增多。一个研究不足的领域是回声室和有影响力的用户对在社交网络中传播疫苗信息的影响。评估回音室在时间上的发展以及关键用户对其发展的影响,为制定有效的传播策略以防止疫苗接种犹豫的增加提供了有价值的见解。这也符合世界卫生组织(WHO)的信息流行病学研究议程,该议程旨在为社会倾听提出新的方法:本研究旨在利用一个台湾论坛的数据,研究有影响力的用户在不同 COVID-19 立场内和不同立场间的参与模式是如何随着时间的推移促成回声室的形成的:本研究的数据来自一个名为 PTT 的台湾论坛。从 2021 年 1 月到 2022 年 12 月,使用关键词 "疫苗 "搜索了 "八卦 "子论坛上所有与疫苗相关的帖子。我们构建了一个多层网络模型来评估回音室的存在。每一层根据特定标准代表支持疫苗接种、疫苗犹豫不决或反对疫苗接种的帖子。层级指标,如平均多样性和斯皮尔曼等级相关性,被用来衡量回声室的情况。为了了解网络中具有影响力的用户(或关键节点)的行为,对高多样性节点和强硬派节点的活动进行了分析:总体而言,接种疫苗层和反接种疫苗层呈现出强烈的两极分化。这种趋势具有时间性,在 2021 年 11 月之后变得更加明显。多样化节点主要参与与预防接种话题相关的讨论,既接收评论,也发表意见。与反疫苗接种层的互动相对较少,这可能是由于其规模较小,表明该论坛是一个 "健康的社区"。总体而言,不同的节点都表现出了跨领域的参与。相比之下,疫苗犹豫层和反疫苗接种层中的强硬派在自己的社区中评论更为活跃。这一趋势具有时间性,在奥密克隆疫情爆发期间有所上升。强硬派的活动可能会随着时间的推移而强化他们的立场。因此,存在着分层和交叉的对立力量:应努力缓和反疫苗接种层中强硬派和有影响力的节点,并为参与交叉交流的疫苗接种用户提供支持。本研究存在一些局限性。其一是所使用平台的偏差,其二是缺乏对 "影响力 "的全面定义。为了解决这些问题,可以在不同平台上进行比较研究,并探索各种影响力指标。此外,通过网络模拟和回归分析来研究有影响力的用户对网络结构和分室的影响,可以提供更有力的见解。该研究还缺乏对分室趋势背后原因的解释。进行内容分析有助于了解参与的性质,并为解决回音室问题的干预措施提供信息。这些方法与世卫组织的信息流行病研究议程相一致,并将进一步推动该议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vaccine Hesitancy in Taiwan: Temporal, Multilayer Network Study of Echo Chambers Shaped by Influential Users.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a growing global health threat that is increasingly studied through the monitoring and analysis of social media platforms. One understudied area is the impact of echo chambers and influential users on disseminating vaccine information in social networks. Assessing the temporal development of echo chambers and the influence of key users on their growth provides valuable insights into effective communication strategies to prevent increases in vaccine hesitancy. This also aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) infodemiology research agenda, which aims to propose new methods for social listening.

Objective: Using data from a Taiwanese forum, this study aims to examine how engagement patterns of influential users, both within and across different COVID-19 stances, contribute to the formation of echo chambers over time.

Methods: Data for this study come from a Taiwanese forum called PTT. All vaccine-related posts on the "Gossiping" subforum were scraped from January 2021 to December 2022 using the keyword "vaccine." A multilayer network model was constructed to assess the existence of echo chambers. Each layer represents either provaccination, vaccine hesitant, or antivaccination posts based on specific criteria. Layer-level metrics, such as average diversity and Spearman rank correlations, were used to measure chambering. To understand the behavior of influential users-or key nodes-in the network, the activity of high-diversity and hardliner nodes was analyzed.

Results: Overall, the provaccination and antivaccination layers are strongly polarized. This trend is temporal and becomes more apparent after November 2021. Diverse nodes primarily participate in discussions related to provaccination topics, both receiving comments and contributing to them. Interactions with the antivaccination layer are comparatively minimal, likely due to its smaller size, suggesting that the forum is a "healthy community." Overall, diverse nodes exhibit cross-cutting engagement. By contrast, hardliners in the vaccine hesitant and antivaccination layers are more active in commenting within their own communities. This trend is temporal, showing an increase during the Omicron outbreak. Hardliner activity potentially reinforces their stances over time. Thus, there are opposing forces of chambering and cross-cutting.

Conclusions: Efforts should be made to moderate hardliner and influential nodes in the antivaccination layer and to support provaccination users engaged in cross-cutting exchanges. There are several limitations to this study. One is the bias of the platform used, and another is the lack of a comprehensive definition of "influence." To address these issues, comparative studies across different platforms can be conducted, and various metrics of influence should be explored. Additionally, examining the impact of influential users on network structure and chambering through network simulations and regression analysis provides more robust insights. The study also lacks an explanation for the reasons behind chambering trends. Conducting content analysis can help to understand the nature of engagement and inform interventions to address echo chambers. These approaches align with and further the WHO infodemic research agenda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Population Digital Health: Continuous Health Monitoring and Profiling at Scale. Rank Ordered Design Attributes for Health Care Dashboards Including Artificial Intelligence: Usability Study. Attitudes of Health Professionals Toward Digital Health Data Security in Northwest Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study. Contact Tracing Different Age Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Study From South-West Germany. Data Analytics to Support Policy Making for Noncommunicable Diseases: Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1