经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗顺序的随机比较:TAVI PCI 试验的原理与设计。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.07.019
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗顺序的随机比较:TAVI PCI 试验的原理与设计。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.07.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>About half of patients with severe aortic stenosis present with concomitant coronary artery disease. The optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The TAVI PCI trial is a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, 2-arm, open-label study planning to enroll a total of 986 patients. It is designed to investigate whether the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization after (within 1-45 days) TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization before (within 1-45 days) TAVI” using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 or 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment strategies. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, rehospitalization (valve- or procedure-related including heart failure), or life-threatening/disabling or major bleeding at 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The TAVI PCI trial tests the hypothesis that the strategy “PCI after TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “PCI before TAVI” in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized comparison of the treatment sequence of percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Rationale and design of the TAVI PCI trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.07.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>About half of patients with severe aortic stenosis present with concomitant coronary artery disease. The optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The TAVI PCI trial is a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, 2-arm, open-label study planning to enroll a total of 986 patients. It is designed to investigate whether the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization after (within 1-45 days) TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization before (within 1-45 days) TAVI” using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 or 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment strategies. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, rehospitalization (valve- or procedure-related including heart failure), or life-threatening/disabling or major bleeding at 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The TAVI PCI trial tests the hypothesis that the strategy “PCI after TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “PCI before TAVI” in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001844\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大约一半的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者同时伴有冠状动脉疾病。对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄并伴有冠状动脉疾病的患者,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的最佳时机仍然未知:TAVI PCI 试验是一项前瞻性、国际性、多中心、随机、双臂、开放标签研究,计划共招募 986 名患者。该研究旨在探讨在重度主动脉瓣狭窄并伴有冠状动脉疾病的患者中,使用 Edwards SAPIEN 3 或 3 Ultra 经导管心脏瓣膜™进行 "TAVI 后(1-45 天内)血管造影引导下的完全血运重建 "策略是否优于 "TAVI 前(1-45 天内)血管造影引导下的完全血运重建 "策略。患者按 1:1 的比例随机选择两种治疗策略中的一种。主要终点是1年内全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、缺血导致的血管再通、再住院(瓣膜或手术相关,包括心衰)或危及生命/致残或大出血的复合终点:TAVI PCI试验验证了一个假设,即对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄并伴有冠状动脉疾病的患者,"TAVI术后PCI "策略并不优于 "TAVI术前PCI "策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized comparison of the treatment sequence of percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Rationale and design of the TAVI PCI trial

Background

About half of patients with severe aortic stenosis present with concomitant coronary artery disease. The optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease remains unknown.

Study design

The TAVI PCI trial is a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, 2-arm, open-label study planning to enroll a total of 986 patients. It is designed to investigate whether the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization after (within 1-45 days) TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “angiography-guided complete revascularization before (within 1-45 days) TAVI” using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 or 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment strategies. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, rehospitalization (valve- or procedure-related including heart failure), or life-threatening/disabling or major bleeding at 1 year.

Conclusions

The TAVI PCI trial tests the hypothesis that the strategy “PCI after TAVI” is noninferior to the strategy “PCI before TAVI” in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gamification to Increase Physical Activity Among Black and Hispanic Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors: Rationale and Design of the ALLSTAR Clinical Trial. TRanscatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery: the TRACS trial: TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery. Win Ratio Analyses Using a Modified Hierarchical Composite Outcome: Insights from PARAGLIDE-HF. Rationale and Design of the DEFIANCE Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Anticoagulation Alone for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis. Use of E-Cigarette, Traditional Cigarettes, and C-Reactive Protein: The Cross Cohort Collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1