损失框架下冲动性个体差异的计算和神经基础。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Human Brain Mapping Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1002/hbm.26808
Keying Jiang, Guang Zhao, Qian Feng, Shunping Guan, Hohjin Im, Bin Zhang, Pinchun Wang, Xuji Jia, Haidong Zhu, Ye Zhu, He Wang, Qiang Wang
{"title":"损失框架下冲动性个体差异的计算和神经基础。","authors":"Keying Jiang,&nbsp;Guang Zhao,&nbsp;Qian Feng,&nbsp;Shunping Guan,&nbsp;Hohjin Im,&nbsp;Bin Zhang,&nbsp;Pinchun Wang,&nbsp;Xuji Jia,&nbsp;Haidong Zhu,&nbsp;Ye Zhu,&nbsp;He Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1002/hbm.26808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerous neuroimaging studies have identified significant individual variability in intertemporal choice, often attributed to three neural mechanisms: (1) increased reward circuit activity, (2) decreased cognitive control, and (3) prospection ability. These mechanisms that explain impulsivity, however, have been primarily studied in the gain domain. This study extends this investigation to the loss domain. We employed a hierarchical Bayesian drift-diffusion model (DDM) and the inter-subject representational similarity approach (IS-RSA) to investigate the potential computational neural substrates underlying impulsivity in loss domain across two experiments (<i>n</i> = 155). These experiments utilized a revised intertemporal task that independently manipulated the amounts of immediate and delayed-loss options. Behavioral results demonstrated positive correlations between the drift rate, measured by the DDM, and the impulsivity index <i>K</i> in <b>Exp.</b> 1 (<i>n</i> = 97) and were replicated in <b>Exp.</b> 2 (<i>n</i> = 58). Imaging analyses further revealed that the drift rate significantly mediated the relations between brain properties (e.g., prefrontal cortex activations and gray matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and precuneus) and <i>K</i> in <b>Exp.</b> 1. IS-RSA analyses indicated that variability in the drift rate also mediated the associations between inter-subject variations in activation patterns and individual differences in <i>K</i>. These findings suggest that individuals with similar impulsivity levels are likely to exhibit similar value processing patterns, providing a potential explanation for individual differences in impulsivity within a loss framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The computational and neural substrates of individual differences in impulsivity under loss framework\",\"authors\":\"Keying Jiang,&nbsp;Guang Zhao,&nbsp;Qian Feng,&nbsp;Shunping Guan,&nbsp;Hohjin Im,&nbsp;Bin Zhang,&nbsp;Pinchun Wang,&nbsp;Xuji Jia,&nbsp;Haidong Zhu,&nbsp;Ye Zhu,&nbsp;He Wang,&nbsp;Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.26808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Numerous neuroimaging studies have identified significant individual variability in intertemporal choice, often attributed to three neural mechanisms: (1) increased reward circuit activity, (2) decreased cognitive control, and (3) prospection ability. These mechanisms that explain impulsivity, however, have been primarily studied in the gain domain. This study extends this investigation to the loss domain. We employed a hierarchical Bayesian drift-diffusion model (DDM) and the inter-subject representational similarity approach (IS-RSA) to investigate the potential computational neural substrates underlying impulsivity in loss domain across two experiments (<i>n</i> = 155). These experiments utilized a revised intertemporal task that independently manipulated the amounts of immediate and delayed-loss options. Behavioral results demonstrated positive correlations between the drift rate, measured by the DDM, and the impulsivity index <i>K</i> in <b>Exp.</b> 1 (<i>n</i> = 97) and were replicated in <b>Exp.</b> 2 (<i>n</i> = 58). Imaging analyses further revealed that the drift rate significantly mediated the relations between brain properties (e.g., prefrontal cortex activations and gray matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and precuneus) and <i>K</i> in <b>Exp.</b> 1. IS-RSA analyses indicated that variability in the drift rate also mediated the associations between inter-subject variations in activation patterns and individual differences in <i>K</i>. These findings suggest that individuals with similar impulsivity levels are likely to exhibit similar value processing patterns, providing a potential explanation for individual differences in impulsivity within a loss framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26808\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量神经影像学研究发现,在时际选择方面存在显著的个体差异,这通常归因于三种神经机制:(1)奖赏回路活动增加;(2)认知控制能力下降;以及(3)预测能力。然而,这些解释冲动性的机制主要是在收益领域进行研究的。本研究将这一研究扩展到了损失领域。我们采用了分层贝叶斯漂移-扩散模型(DDM)和受试者间表征相似性方法(IS-RSA),通过两次实验(n = 155)研究了损失域冲动的潜在计算神经基质。这些实验采用了一个经过修订的时际任务,该任务独立地操纵了立即损失和延迟损失选项的数量。行为结果表明,在实验 1(n = 97)中,通过 DDM 测量的漂移率与冲动指数 K 之间存在正相关,并在实验 2(n = 58)中得到了验证。成像分析进一步显示,在实验 1 中,漂移率明显介导了大脑特性(如前额叶皮层激活和眶额叶皮层及楔前灰质体积)与 K 之间的关系。IS-RSA分析表明,漂移率的变化也介导了激活模式的受试者间差异与K的个体差异之间的关系。这些发现表明,具有相似冲动水平的个体很可能表现出相似的价值加工模式,这为在损失框架内解释冲动的个体差异提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The computational and neural substrates of individual differences in impulsivity under loss framework

Numerous neuroimaging studies have identified significant individual variability in intertemporal choice, often attributed to three neural mechanisms: (1) increased reward circuit activity, (2) decreased cognitive control, and (3) prospection ability. These mechanisms that explain impulsivity, however, have been primarily studied in the gain domain. This study extends this investigation to the loss domain. We employed a hierarchical Bayesian drift-diffusion model (DDM) and the inter-subject representational similarity approach (IS-RSA) to investigate the potential computational neural substrates underlying impulsivity in loss domain across two experiments (n = 155). These experiments utilized a revised intertemporal task that independently manipulated the amounts of immediate and delayed-loss options. Behavioral results demonstrated positive correlations between the drift rate, measured by the DDM, and the impulsivity index K in Exp. 1 (n = 97) and were replicated in Exp. 2 (n = 58). Imaging analyses further revealed that the drift rate significantly mediated the relations between brain properties (e.g., prefrontal cortex activations and gray matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and precuneus) and K in Exp. 1. IS-RSA analyses indicated that variability in the drift rate also mediated the associations between inter-subject variations in activation patterns and individual differences in K. These findings suggest that individuals with similar impulsivity levels are likely to exhibit similar value processing patterns, providing a potential explanation for individual differences in impulsivity within a loss framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Engagement of the speech motor system in challenging speech perception: Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses Language networks of normal-hearing infants exhibit topological differences between resting and steady states: An fNIRS functional connectivity study Task-specific topology of brain networks supporting working memory and inhibition Compressed cerebro-cerebellar functional gradients in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1