急诊科的狂犬病暴露后预防:单中心回顾性观察研究。

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102750
Mareen Braunstein , Markus Wörnle
{"title":"急诊科的狂犬病暴露后预防:单中心回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Mareen Braunstein ,&nbsp;Markus Wörnle","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency departments (ED) are frequently visited after suspected rabies exposure (SRE) and the potential need for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (R-PEP). However, data on the number of visits, patients' demographics, travel history and the medical treatment is still rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the number of R-PEP and the appropriateness of medical management including wound treatment, vaccination regime and immunoglobulin application following SRE in a university hospital ED.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a monocentric retrospective observational study on emergency patients treated in the ED of the LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, between June 1st<sup>,</sup> 2023 and January 31st<sup>,</sup> 2024. Patients requiring post-exposure prophylaxis due to SRE abroad or in Germany were included. Demographic data, travel history, clinical findings, wound treatment, and R-PEP vaccination regimen were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the observation period of 245 days 43 patients presented to our ED for R-PEP. There was a total of 51 presentation appointments, as 5 patients returned for further treatment. Most patients (27, 52.9 %) presented at the ED on a Saturday, Sunday, or a public holiday. 17 (39.5 %) patients had a category II exposure, and 26 (60.5 %) had a category III exposure. In our ED, there were 28 (55.0 %) active vaccinations and 23 (45.0 %) both active and passive vaccinations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data show that patients frequently present for R-PEP in ED. Therefore, there is a high need for education on indication for R-PEP and for implementation of precise R-PEP treatment guidelines in daily clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 102750"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000668/pdfft?md5=659034fcf303c9a9474be79a580fc542&pid=1-s2.0-S1477893924000668-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in the emergency department: A monocentric retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Mareen Braunstein ,&nbsp;Markus Wörnle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency departments (ED) are frequently visited after suspected rabies exposure (SRE) and the potential need for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (R-PEP). However, data on the number of visits, patients' demographics, travel history and the medical treatment is still rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the number of R-PEP and the appropriateness of medical management including wound treatment, vaccination regime and immunoglobulin application following SRE in a university hospital ED.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a monocentric retrospective observational study on emergency patients treated in the ED of the LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, between June 1st<sup>,</sup> 2023 and January 31st<sup>,</sup> 2024. Patients requiring post-exposure prophylaxis due to SRE abroad or in Germany were included. Demographic data, travel history, clinical findings, wound treatment, and R-PEP vaccination regimen were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the observation period of 245 days 43 patients presented to our ED for R-PEP. There was a total of 51 presentation appointments, as 5 patients returned for further treatment. Most patients (27, 52.9 %) presented at the ED on a Saturday, Sunday, or a public holiday. 17 (39.5 %) patients had a category II exposure, and 26 (60.5 %) had a category III exposure. In our ED, there were 28 (55.0 %) active vaccinations and 23 (45.0 %) both active and passive vaccinations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data show that patients frequently present for R-PEP in ED. Therefore, there is a high need for education on indication for R-PEP and for implementation of precise R-PEP treatment guidelines in daily clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000668/pdfft?md5=659034fcf303c9a9474be79a580fc542&pid=1-s2.0-S1477893924000668-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000668\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893924000668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疑似狂犬病暴露(SRE)和可能需要狂犬病暴露后预防(R-PEP)的患者经常到急诊科(ED)就诊。然而,有关就诊人数、患者人口统计学特征、旅行史和治疗方法的数据仍然很少。因此,本研究的目的是评估大学医院急诊室狂犬病暴露后预防的次数和医疗管理的适当性,包括伤口处理、疫苗接种制度和免疫球蛋白应用:我们对 2023 年 6 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日期间在德国慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学 LMU 大学医院急诊科接受治疗的急诊患者进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究。研究对象包括在国外或德国因感染 SRE 而需要进行暴露后预防治疗的患者。结果:在245天的观察期内,有43名患者到我们的急诊室就诊,要求接种R-PEP疫苗。由于有 5 名患者返回接受进一步治疗,因此共预约了 51 次就诊。大多数患者(27 人,占 52.9%)在周六、周日或公共节假日到急诊科就诊。17名患者(39.5%)属于二类暴露,26名患者(60.5%)属于三类暴露。在我们的急诊室,有 28 人(55.0%)主动接种过疫苗,23 人(45.0%)同时主动和被动接种过疫苗:我们的数据显示,急诊科经常有患者前来接种 R-PEP。结论:我们的数据显示,急诊科经常有患者前来接种 R-PEP 疫苗,因此,急需开展有关 R-PEP 适应症的教育,并在日常临床实践中实施精确的 R-PEP 治疗指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in the emergency department: A monocentric retrospective observational study

Background

Emergency departments (ED) are frequently visited after suspected rabies exposure (SRE) and the potential need for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (R-PEP). However, data on the number of visits, patients' demographics, travel history and the medical treatment is still rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the number of R-PEP and the appropriateness of medical management including wound treatment, vaccination regime and immunoglobulin application following SRE in a university hospital ED.

Method

We conducted a monocentric retrospective observational study on emergency patients treated in the ED of the LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, between June 1st, 2023 and January 31st, 2024. Patients requiring post-exposure prophylaxis due to SRE abroad or in Germany were included. Demographic data, travel history, clinical findings, wound treatment, and R-PEP vaccination regimen were recorded.

Results

During the observation period of 245 days 43 patients presented to our ED for R-PEP. There was a total of 51 presentation appointments, as 5 patients returned for further treatment. Most patients (27, 52.9 %) presented at the ED on a Saturday, Sunday, or a public holiday. 17 (39.5 %) patients had a category II exposure, and 26 (60.5 %) had a category III exposure. In our ED, there were 28 (55.0 %) active vaccinations and 23 (45.0 %) both active and passive vaccinations.

Conclusions

Our data show that patients frequently present for R-PEP in ED. Therefore, there is a high need for education on indication for R-PEP and for implementation of precise R-PEP treatment guidelines in daily clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
期刊最新文献
Asian lineage Zika virus infection in a traveler returning to Italy from Seychelles, April 2024 A case report on symptomatic disease caused by serotype 4 vaccine virus following tetravalent anti-dengue vaccination Global spread of mpox Clade I: Implications for travel and public health Characteristics and morbidity patterns of last-minute travelers in Thailand Concurrent strongyloidiasis and necatoriasis in a Cambodian technical intern trainee in Japan that committed suicide: Diagnosis prompted by Taenia saginata proglottids in watery diarrhea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1