经导管主动脉瓣置换术前疗养院住院时间和疗效。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19124
Preston N. Nicely MD, Laiji Yang MPH, Dae Hyun Kim MD, ScD, Sarah D. Berry MD, MPH
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术前疗养院住院时间和疗效。","authors":"Preston N. Nicely MD,&nbsp;Laiji Yang MPH,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim MD, ScD,&nbsp;Sarah D. Berry MD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may receive care in a nursing home (NH) prior to undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). NH level of care can be used to stabilize medical conditions, to provide rehabilitation services, or for long-term care services. Our primary objective is to determine whether NH utilization pre-TAVR can be used to stratify patients at risk for higher mortality and poor disposition outcomes at 30 and 365 days post-TAVR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries who spent ≥1 day in an NH 6 months before TAVR (2011–2019). The intensity of NH utilization was categorized as low users (1–30 days), medium users (31–89 days), long-stay NH residents (≥ 100 days, with no more than a 10-day gap in care), and high post-acute rehabilitation patients (≥90 days, with more than a 10-day gap in care). The probabilities of death and disposition were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and race.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 15,581 patients, 9908 (63.6%) were low users, 4312 (27.7%) were medium users, 663 (4.3%) were high post-acute care rehab users, and 698 (4.4%) were long-stay NH residents before TAVR. High post-acute care rehabilitation patients were more likely to have dementia, weight loss, falls, and extensive dependence of activities of daily living (ADLs) as compared with low NH users. Mortality was the greatest in high post-acute care rehab users: 5.5% at 30 days, and 36.4% at 365 days. In contrast, low NH users had similar mortality rates compared with long-stay NH residents: 4.8% versus 4.8% at 30 days, and 24.9% versus 27.0% at 365 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Frequent bouts of post-acute rehabilitation before TAVR were associated with adverse outcomes, yet this metric may be helpful to determine which patients with severe AS could benefit from palliative and geriatric services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3510-3519"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-procedural nursing home length of stay and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement\",\"authors\":\"Preston N. Nicely MD,&nbsp;Laiji Yang MPH,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim MD, ScD,&nbsp;Sarah D. Berry MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may receive care in a nursing home (NH) prior to undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). NH level of care can be used to stabilize medical conditions, to provide rehabilitation services, or for long-term care services. Our primary objective is to determine whether NH utilization pre-TAVR can be used to stratify patients at risk for higher mortality and poor disposition outcomes at 30 and 365 days post-TAVR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries who spent ≥1 day in an NH 6 months before TAVR (2011–2019). The intensity of NH utilization was categorized as low users (1–30 days), medium users (31–89 days), long-stay NH residents (≥ 100 days, with no more than a 10-day gap in care), and high post-acute rehabilitation patients (≥90 days, with more than a 10-day gap in care). The probabilities of death and disposition were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and race.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 15,581 patients, 9908 (63.6%) were low users, 4312 (27.7%) were medium users, 663 (4.3%) were high post-acute care rehab users, and 698 (4.4%) were long-stay NH residents before TAVR. High post-acute care rehabilitation patients were more likely to have dementia, weight loss, falls, and extensive dependence of activities of daily living (ADLs) as compared with low NH users. Mortality was the greatest in high post-acute care rehab users: 5.5% at 30 days, and 36.4% at 365 days. In contrast, low NH users had similar mortality rates compared with long-stay NH residents: 4.8% versus 4.8% at 30 days, and 24.9% versus 27.0% at 365 days.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Frequent bouts of post-acute rehabilitation before TAVR were associated with adverse outcomes, yet this metric may be helpful to determine which patients with severe AS could benefit from palliative and geriatric services.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"3510-3519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的老年人在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)之前可能会在疗养院(NH)接受护理。疗养院的护理水平可用于稳定病情、提供康复服务或长期护理服务。我们的主要目的是确定经导管主动脉瓣置换术前使用 NH 的情况是否可用于对死亡率较高和经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天和 365 天处置结果较差的患者进行分层:我们对 TAVR 术前 6 个月(2011-2019 年)在 NH 中停留时间≥1 天的医疗保险受益人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。疗养院使用强度分为低度使用者(1-30 天)、中度使用者(31-89 天)、长期疗养院居民(≥ 100 天,护理间隔不超过 10 天)和高度急性期后康复患者(≥ 90 天,护理间隔超过 10 天)。在对年龄、性别和种族进行调整后,使用多项式逻辑回归对死亡和处置的概率进行了估计:在15581名患者中,9908人(63.6%)为低度使用者,4312人(27.7%)为中度使用者,663人(4.3%)为高度急性期后护理康复使用者,698人(4.4%)为TAVR前长期住院的新罕布什尔州居民。与低度住院患者相比,高度护理后康复患者更容易出现痴呆、体重减轻、跌倒和日常生活活动(ADLs)广泛依赖等问题。急性期后护理康复患者的死亡率最高:30 天内死亡率为 5.5%,365 天内死亡率为 36.4%。相比之下,低住院率患者的死亡率与长期住院的患者相近:30天的死亡率为4.8%对4.8%,365天的死亡率为24.9%对27.0%:结论:TAVR术前频繁的急性期后康复治疗与不良预后有关,但这一指标可能有助于确定哪些严重AS患者可以从姑息治疗和老年医学服务中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-procedural nursing home length of stay and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may receive care in a nursing home (NH) prior to undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). NH level of care can be used to stabilize medical conditions, to provide rehabilitation services, or for long-term care services. Our primary objective is to determine whether NH utilization pre-TAVR can be used to stratify patients at risk for higher mortality and poor disposition outcomes at 30 and 365 days post-TAVR.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries who spent ≥1 day in an NH 6 months before TAVR (2011–2019). The intensity of NH utilization was categorized as low users (1–30 days), medium users (31–89 days), long-stay NH residents (≥ 100 days, with no more than a 10-day gap in care), and high post-acute rehabilitation patients (≥90 days, with more than a 10-day gap in care). The probabilities of death and disposition were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and race.

Results

Among 15,581 patients, 9908 (63.6%) were low users, 4312 (27.7%) were medium users, 663 (4.3%) were high post-acute care rehab users, and 698 (4.4%) were long-stay NH residents before TAVR. High post-acute care rehabilitation patients were more likely to have dementia, weight loss, falls, and extensive dependence of activities of daily living (ADLs) as compared with low NH users. Mortality was the greatest in high post-acute care rehab users: 5.5% at 30 days, and 36.4% at 365 days. In contrast, low NH users had similar mortality rates compared with long-stay NH residents: 4.8% versus 4.8% at 30 days, and 24.9% versus 27.0% at 365 days.

Conclusion

Frequent bouts of post-acute rehabilitation before TAVR were associated with adverse outcomes, yet this metric may be helpful to determine which patients with severe AS could benefit from palliative and geriatric services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1