一氧化二氮的使用对产妇回忆神经镇痛风险的影响。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579
Emily E. Sharpe MD , Lindsay L. Warner MD , Benjamin D. Brakke DO , Paul R. Davis MD , David M. Finkel MD , Christopher M. Burkle MD, JD , Andrew C. Hanson MS , Rochelle J. Pompeian MD , Katherine W. Arendt MD , Yvonne S. Butler Tobah MD , Hans P. Sviggum MD
{"title":"一氧化二氮的使用对产妇回忆神经镇痛风险的影响。","authors":"Emily E. Sharpe MD ,&nbsp;Lindsay L. Warner MD ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Brakke DO ,&nbsp;Paul R. Davis MD ,&nbsp;David M. Finkel MD ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Burkle MD, JD ,&nbsp;Andrew C. Hanson MS ,&nbsp;Rochelle J. Pompeian MD ,&nbsp;Katherine W. Arendt MD ,&nbsp;Yvonne S. Butler Tobah MD ,&nbsp;Hans P. Sviggum MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (<em>P</em> = .18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 111579"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks\",\"authors\":\"Emily E. Sharpe MD ,&nbsp;Lindsay L. Warner MD ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Brakke DO ,&nbsp;Paul R. Davis MD ,&nbsp;David M. Finkel MD ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Burkle MD, JD ,&nbsp;Andrew C. Hanson MS ,&nbsp;Rochelle J. Pompeian MD ,&nbsp;Katherine W. Arendt MD ,&nbsp;Yvonne S. Butler Tobah MD ,&nbsp;Hans P. Sviggum MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Single-center, prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (<em>P</em> = .18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的一氧化二氮会影响记忆和回忆。我们旨在确定在分娩过程中使用一氧化二氮是否会影响患者学习和回忆神经镇痛风险和益处的能力:单中心、前瞻性队列研究:地点:一家大型学术医疗中心的产房:患者:自然引产或计划引产的无阴道患者:产妇选择是否在分娩过程中使用一氧化二氮。在讨论是否同意硬膜外麻醉时,描述了4种风险:头痛、感染、神经损伤、出血:在讨论硬膜外麻醉风险时记录分娩疼痛评分、停止使用一氧化二氮的时间和宫颈扩张情况。在产后第 1 天对患者进行无提示回忆和提示回忆硬膜外风险评估,在产后第 6 周进行无提示回忆评估。按治疗组总结了指出每种真实风险(无提示回忆和提示回忆)或干扰因素(仅提示回忆)的患者人数和比例,并使用 Pearson χ2 检验对结果进行比较:在 403 名注册患者中,294 人(73%)未使用一氧化二氮,109 人(27%)使用了一氧化二氮。两组患者的情况相似,但使用一氧化二氮的女性更有可能由助产士护理,且在要求硬膜外麻醉时疼痛评分更高。接受或未接受一氧化二氮的产妇在未经提示或提示下回忆硬膜外麻醉风险的得分没有差异。氧化亚氮组仅有3%的产妇在未提示的情况下回忆起所有4种风险,而未接受氧化亚氮的产妇则有6%(P = .18):结论:使用一氧化二氮进行分娩镇痛不会对产妇回忆硬膜外置管风险的能力产生不利影响。接受一氧化二氮分娩镇痛的患者应被视为有资格对后续手术表示同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks

Study objective

Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia.

Design

Single-center, prospective cohort study.

Setting

Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center.

Patients

Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor.

Interventions

Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding.

Measurements

Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ2 tests.

Main results

Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (P = .18).

Conclusions

The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Oral ketamine for acute postoperative analgesia (OKAPA) trial: A randomized controlled, single center pilot study. Letter to the editor regarding "The effects of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis after general anesthesia induction assessed by lung ultrasound: A randomized controlled trial". Defining standards of care for AI and clinicians alike: Regarding ChatGPT in labor analgesia management Continuation versus discontinuation of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors before non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Continuous vital sign monitoring on surgical wards: The COSMOS pilot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1