巢式 PCR 可有效检测动物样本中的低病毒载量 SARS-CoV-2。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Preventive veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106303
{"title":"巢式 PCR 可有效检测动物样本中的低病毒载量 SARS-CoV-2。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>SARS-CoV-2 emerged from an animal source and was then transmitted to humans, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Since a wide range of animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the zoonotic potential of SARS-CoV-2 increases with every new animal infected. The molecular gold standard assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection is real-time RT-PCR, where the Ct obtained is proportional to the amount of nucleic acid and can be a semi-quantitative measure of the viral load. However, since the use of real-time RT-PCR assays in animal samples is low due to the high costs, the use of validated nested PCR assays will help to monitor large-scale animal samplings, by reducing the costs of detection. In the present study, 140 samples from dogs and cats (15 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples with Ct values from 27 to 33, and 125 negative samples), previously analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, were analyzed by nested PCR. To increase the number of positive samples to determine the sensitivity of the assay, 40 human samples obtained during COVID-19 diagnosis in 2020 were included. The specificity of the primers was analyzed against samples positive to canine coronavirus (CCV) and feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). To calculate the limit of detection (LoD) of the nested PCR, the viral load was estimated extrapolating the Ct value obtained by real-time RT-PCR. The Ct values obtained were considered as semi-quantitative and were able to distinguish between high, moderate and low viral loads. The Kappa value or “agreement” between assays and reliability of the nested PCR were also determined. Eleven of the animal samples analyzed by nested PCR targeting the N gene were detected as positive, while 129 were detected as negative to the virus, with Ct values ranging between17 and 31.5. All the samples from humans analyzed by nested PCR were positive. These results indicate that the assay has a sensitivity of near 95 % and a specificity of 100 %. No unspecific reactions analyzed by nested PCR were observed with the samples positive to CCV and FIPV. The samples detected as positive to SARS-CoV-2 by nested PCR were those that presented a Ct between17 and 31.5. The LoD of the nested PCR was estimated close to 50 copies/µL of viral load, corresponding with a Ct of 31.5. The Kappa value between assays was excellent (<em>k</em> = 0.829). The results obtained demonstrate that nested PCR is useful to detect SARS-CoV-2 low viral loads at a lower cost than with real-time RT-PCR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nested PCR effective to detect low viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in animal samples\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>SARS-CoV-2 emerged from an animal source and was then transmitted to humans, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Since a wide range of animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the zoonotic potential of SARS-CoV-2 increases with every new animal infected. The molecular gold standard assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection is real-time RT-PCR, where the Ct obtained is proportional to the amount of nucleic acid and can be a semi-quantitative measure of the viral load. However, since the use of real-time RT-PCR assays in animal samples is low due to the high costs, the use of validated nested PCR assays will help to monitor large-scale animal samplings, by reducing the costs of detection. In the present study, 140 samples from dogs and cats (15 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples with Ct values from 27 to 33, and 125 negative samples), previously analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, were analyzed by nested PCR. To increase the number of positive samples to determine the sensitivity of the assay, 40 human samples obtained during COVID-19 diagnosis in 2020 were included. The specificity of the primers was analyzed against samples positive to canine coronavirus (CCV) and feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). To calculate the limit of detection (LoD) of the nested PCR, the viral load was estimated extrapolating the Ct value obtained by real-time RT-PCR. The Ct values obtained were considered as semi-quantitative and were able to distinguish between high, moderate and low viral loads. The Kappa value or “agreement” between assays and reliability of the nested PCR were also determined. Eleven of the animal samples analyzed by nested PCR targeting the N gene were detected as positive, while 129 were detected as negative to the virus, with Ct values ranging between17 and 31.5. All the samples from humans analyzed by nested PCR were positive. These results indicate that the assay has a sensitivity of near 95 % and a specificity of 100 %. No unspecific reactions analyzed by nested PCR were observed with the samples positive to CCV and FIPV. The samples detected as positive to SARS-CoV-2 by nested PCR were those that presented a Ct between17 and 31.5. The LoD of the nested PCR was estimated close to 50 copies/µL of viral load, corresponding with a Ct of 31.5. The Kappa value between assays was excellent (<em>k</em> = 0.829). The results obtained demonstrate that nested PCR is useful to detect SARS-CoV-2 low viral loads at a lower cost than with real-time RT-PCR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724001892\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724001892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SARS-CoV-2 从动物源头出现,然后传播给人类,引发了 COVID-19 大流行。由于多种动物都可能感染 SARS-CoV-2,因此每有一种动物感染,SARS-CoV-2 的人畜共患可能性就会增加。检测 SARS-CoV-2 的分子金标准检测方法是实时 RT-PCR,获得的 Ct 与核酸量成正比,可作为病毒载量的半定量测量方法。然而,由于实时 RT-PCR 检测成本较高,在动物样本中的使用率较低,因此使用经过验证的巢式 PCR 检测方法将有助于监测大规模动物样本,降低检测成本。在本研究中,使用巢式 PCR 分析了 140 份猫狗样本(其中 15 份为 SARS-CoV-2 阳性样本,Ct 值在 27 到 33 之间,125 份为阴性样本),这些样本之前曾使用实时 RT-PCR 分析。为了增加阳性样本的数量以确定该检测方法的灵敏度,2020 年 COVID-19 诊断期间获得的 40 份人类样本也被纳入其中。针对犬冠状病毒(CCV)和猫传染性腹膜炎病毒(FIPV)阳性样本分析了引物的特异性。为了计算巢式 PCR 的检测限(LoD),根据实时 RT-PCR 获得的 Ct 值推算病毒载量。获得的 Ct 值被认为是半定量的,能够区分高、中、低病毒载量。此外,还测定了 Kappa 值或检测方法之间的 "一致性 "以及巢式 PCR 的可靠性。通过针对 N 基因的巢式 PCR 分析,有 11 份动物样本检测出病毒呈阳性,129 份检测出病毒呈阴性,Ct 值介于 17 和 31.5 之间。通过巢式 PCR 分析的所有人类样本均呈阳性。这些结果表明,该检测方法的灵敏度接近 95%,特异性达到 100%。在对 CCV 和 FIPV 呈阳性的样本中,没有发现通过巢式 PCR 分析的非特异性反应。通过巢式 PCR 检测出对 SARS-CoV-2 呈阳性的样本是那些 Ct 值在 17 和 31.5 之间的样本。据估计,巢式 PCR 的 LoD 接近 50 拷贝/微升病毒载量,对应的 Ct 为 31.5。检测之间的 Kappa 值非常好(k = 0.829)。结果表明,与实时 RT-PCR 相比,巢式 PCR 能以更低的成本检测低病毒载量的 SARS-CoV-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nested PCR effective to detect low viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in animal samples

SARS-CoV-2 emerged from an animal source and was then transmitted to humans, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Since a wide range of animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the zoonotic potential of SARS-CoV-2 increases with every new animal infected. The molecular gold standard assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection is real-time RT-PCR, where the Ct obtained is proportional to the amount of nucleic acid and can be a semi-quantitative measure of the viral load. However, since the use of real-time RT-PCR assays in animal samples is low due to the high costs, the use of validated nested PCR assays will help to monitor large-scale animal samplings, by reducing the costs of detection. In the present study, 140 samples from dogs and cats (15 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples with Ct values from 27 to 33, and 125 negative samples), previously analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, were analyzed by nested PCR. To increase the number of positive samples to determine the sensitivity of the assay, 40 human samples obtained during COVID-19 diagnosis in 2020 were included. The specificity of the primers was analyzed against samples positive to canine coronavirus (CCV) and feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). To calculate the limit of detection (LoD) of the nested PCR, the viral load was estimated extrapolating the Ct value obtained by real-time RT-PCR. The Ct values obtained were considered as semi-quantitative and were able to distinguish between high, moderate and low viral loads. The Kappa value or “agreement” between assays and reliability of the nested PCR were also determined. Eleven of the animal samples analyzed by nested PCR targeting the N gene were detected as positive, while 129 were detected as negative to the virus, with Ct values ranging between17 and 31.5. All the samples from humans analyzed by nested PCR were positive. These results indicate that the assay has a sensitivity of near 95 % and a specificity of 100 %. No unspecific reactions analyzed by nested PCR were observed with the samples positive to CCV and FIPV. The samples detected as positive to SARS-CoV-2 by nested PCR were those that presented a Ct between17 and 31.5. The LoD of the nested PCR was estimated close to 50 copies/µL of viral load, corresponding with a Ct of 31.5. The Kappa value between assays was excellent (k = 0.829). The results obtained demonstrate that nested PCR is useful to detect SARS-CoV-2 low viral loads at a lower cost than with real-time RT-PCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
期刊最新文献
Repeatability and predictability of lying and feeding behaviours in dairy cattle Serosurvey of Leptospira spp. in captive non-human primates in Spain Benefits and costs of measures to tackle the outbreak of African swine fever in Sweden Novel characterisation of sheep flocks in Wales: A description of principal flock typologies and antimicrobial use patterns Utilizing machine learning and hemagglutinin sequences to identify likely hosts of influenza H3Nx viruses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1