基于蒙特卡洛的治疗质子和碳离子束热释光剂量计吸收剂量能量依赖性研究

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_25_24
Arghya Chattaraj, Subhalaxmi Mishra, T Palani Selvam
{"title":"基于蒙特卡洛的治疗质子和碳离子束热释光剂量计吸收剂量能量依赖性研究","authors":"Arghya Chattaraj, Subhalaxmi Mishra, T Palani Selvam","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_25_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study is aimed at calculating relative absorbed-dose energy response correction (<i>R</i>) of commonly used thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) such as LiF, Li<sub>2</sub>B<sub>4</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as a function of depth in water for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using Monte Carlo-based FLUKA code.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On-axis depth-dose profiles in water are calculated for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using FLUKA code. For the calculation of <i>R</i>, selective depths are chosen based on the depth-dose profiles. In the simulations, the TLDs of dimensions 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm are positioned at the flat, dose gradient, and Bragg peak regions of the depth-dose profile. Absorbed dose to detector was calculated within the TLD material. In the second step, TLD voxels were replaced by water voxel of similar dimension and absorbed dose to water was scored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals that for both proton and carbon ion beams, the value of <i>R</i> differs from unity significantly at the Bragg peak position and is close to unity at the flat region for the investigated TLDs. The calculated <i>R</i> value is sensitive to depth in water, beam energy, type of ion beam, and type of TLD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>For accurate dosimetry of protons and carbon ion beams using TLDs, the response of the TLD should be corrected to account for its absorbed-dose energy dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 2","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo-based Investigation of Absorbed-dose Energy Dependence of Thermoluminescent Dosimeters in Therapeutic Proton and Carbon Ion Beams.\",\"authors\":\"Arghya Chattaraj, Subhalaxmi Mishra, T Palani Selvam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_25_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study is aimed at calculating relative absorbed-dose energy response correction (<i>R</i>) of commonly used thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) such as LiF, Li<sub>2</sub>B<sub>4</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as a function of depth in water for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using Monte Carlo-based FLUKA code.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On-axis depth-dose profiles in water are calculated for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using FLUKA code. For the calculation of <i>R</i>, selective depths are chosen based on the depth-dose profiles. In the simulations, the TLDs of dimensions 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm are positioned at the flat, dose gradient, and Bragg peak regions of the depth-dose profile. Absorbed dose to detector was calculated within the TLD material. In the second step, TLD voxels were replaced by water voxel of similar dimension and absorbed dose to water was scored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reveals that for both proton and carbon ion beams, the value of <i>R</i> differs from unity significantly at the Bragg peak position and is close to unity at the flat region for the investigated TLDs. The calculated <i>R</i> value is sensitive to depth in water, beam energy, type of ion beam, and type of TLD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>For accurate dosimetry of protons and carbon ion beams using TLDs, the response of the TLD should be corrected to account for its absorbed-dose energy dependence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"148-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_25_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_25_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在使用基于蒙特卡罗的 FLUKA 代码计算常用热释光剂量计(TLD)(如 LiF、Li2B4O7 和 Al2O3)的相对吸收剂量能量响应校正(R)与质子(50-250 MeV/n)和碳离子(80-480 MeV/n)光束在水中深度的函数关系:使用 FLUKA 代码计算质子(50-250 MeV/n)和碳离子(80-480 MeV/n)光束在水中的轴向深度-剂量曲线。在计算 R 时,根据深度-剂量剖面图选择选择性深度。在模拟中,尺寸为 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm 的 TLD 位于深度-剂量剖面的平坦、剂量梯度和布拉格峰区域。在 TLD 材料内部计算探测器的吸收剂量。第二步,用类似尺寸的水体体素代替 TLD 体素,并计算水体的吸收剂量:研究表明,对于质子和碳离子束,R 值在布拉格峰位置与统一值相差很大,而在所研究的 TLD 的平坦区域则接近统一值。计算出的 R 值对水深、光束能量、离子束类型和 TLD 类型都很敏感:讨论:为了使用 TLD 对质子和碳离子束进行准确的剂量测定,应校正 TLD 的响应,以考虑其吸收剂量的能量依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monte Carlo-based Investigation of Absorbed-dose Energy Dependence of Thermoluminescent Dosimeters in Therapeutic Proton and Carbon Ion Beams.

Background: The present study is aimed at calculating relative absorbed-dose energy response correction (R) of commonly used thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) such as LiF, Li2B4O7, and Al2O3 as a function of depth in water for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using Monte Carlo-based FLUKA code.

Materials and methods: On-axis depth-dose profiles in water are calculated for protons (50-250 MeV/n) and carbon ion (80-480 MeV/n) beams using FLUKA code. For the calculation of R, selective depths are chosen based on the depth-dose profiles. In the simulations, the TLDs of dimensions 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm are positioned at the flat, dose gradient, and Bragg peak regions of the depth-dose profile. Absorbed dose to detector was calculated within the TLD material. In the second step, TLD voxels were replaced by water voxel of similar dimension and absorbed dose to water was scored.

Results: The study reveals that for both proton and carbon ion beams, the value of R differs from unity significantly at the Bragg peak position and is close to unity at the flat region for the investigated TLDs. The calculated R value is sensitive to depth in water, beam energy, type of ion beam, and type of TLD.

Discussion: For accurate dosimetry of protons and carbon ion beams using TLDs, the response of the TLD should be corrected to account for its absorbed-dose energy dependence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Effect of Calibration Curves Obtained from Different Computed Tomography Devices on the Dose Distribution of Tomotherapy Plans. Machine Learning Approach and Model for Predicting Proton Stopping Power Ratio and Other Parameters Using Computed Tomography Images. Monte Carlo Simulation of Gamma and Neutron Shielding with High-performance Ultra-heavy Cement Composite. Magnetic Resonance Thermometry of Focused Ultrasound Using a Preclinical Focused Ultrasound Robotic System at 3T. Multifaceted Characterization and Therapeutic Evaluation of Co-precipitated Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1