以身作则的领导力中的社会框架效应：偏好还是信念？

IF 1.7 4区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economic Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1111/ecin.13249

Edward Cartwright, Michalis Drouvelis

{"title":"以身作则的领导力中的社会框架效应：偏好还是信念？","authors":"Edward Cartwright, Michalis Drouvelis","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study the impact of framing on leading-by-example. Our 2 × 2 design consists of group level frames (Wall Street vs. Community) and individual level frames (First/Second Movers vs. Leader/Followers). We report on two studies where we elicit participants' beliefs allowing us to evaluate whether framing effects are driven by beliefs or preferences. Across both studies, average contributions are significantly lower in the Community—First Mover frame. This is primarily because leaders contribute less, pulling down followers' contributions. We find that contributions are strongly related to first order and second order beliefs but framing effects remain once we control for beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51380,"journal":{"name":"Economic Inquiry","volume":"62 4","pages":"1629-1651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecin.13249","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social framing effects in leadership by example: Preferences or beliefs?\",\"authors\":\"Edward Cartwright, Michalis Drouvelis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecin.13249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We study the impact of framing on leading-by-example. Our 2 × 2 design consists of group level frames (Wall Street vs. Community) and individual level frames (First/Second Movers vs. Leader/Followers). We report on two studies where we elicit participants' beliefs allowing us to evaluate whether framing effects are driven by beliefs or preferences. Across both studies, average contributions are significantly lower in the Community—First Mover frame. This is primarily because leaders contribute less, pulling down followers' contributions. We find that contributions are strongly related to first order and second order beliefs but framing effects remain once we control for beliefs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"1629-1651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecin.13249\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.13249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.13249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了框架对 "以身作则 "的影响。我们的 2 × 2 设计包括群体层面的框架（华尔街 vs. 社区）和个人层面的框架（先行者/后行者 vs. 领导者/追随者）。我们报告了两项研究，在这两项研究中，我们激发了参与者的信念，从而评估了框架效应是由信念还是偏好驱动的。在这两项研究中，"社区-先行者 "框架下的平均贡献率明显较低。这主要是因为领导者的贡献较少，从而拉低了追随者的贡献。我们发现，贡献与一阶和二阶信念密切相关，但一旦我们控制了信念，框架效应依然存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Social framing effects in leadership by example: Preferences or beliefs?

We study the impact of framing on leading-by-example. Our 2 × 2 design consists of group level frames (Wall Street vs. Community) and individual level frames (First/Second Movers vs. Leader/Followers). We report on two studies where we elicit participants' beliefs allowing us to evaluate whether framing effects are driven by beliefs or preferences. Across both studies, average contributions are significantly lower in the Community—First Mover frame. This is primarily because leaders contribute less, pulling down followers' contributions. We find that contributions are strongly related to first order and second order beliefs but framing effects remain once we control for beliefs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economic Inquiry ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published since 1962, (formerly Western Economic Journal), EI is widely regarded as one of the top scholarly journals in its field. Besides containing research on all economics topic areas, a principal objective is to make each article understandable to economists who are not necessarily specialists in the article topic area. Nine Nobel laureates are among EI long list of prestigious authors.

期刊最新文献

Issue Information Economic Inquiry 2023 Editor's Report Hedging mortality risk over the life-cycle—The role of information and borrowing constraints Tullock contest with reference-dependent preferences Social framing effects in leadership by example: Preferences or beliefs?