A. M. Bucher, Adrian Koppold, Mattias Kettner, Sarah Kölzer, Julia Dietz, Eric Frodl, Alexey Surov, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Thomas J. Vogl, M. A. Verhoff, M. Beeres, Constantin Lux, Sara Heinbuch
{"title":"加强法医诊断:死后 CT 与尸检的结构化报告:扼杀性喉头复合体骨折","authors":"A. M. Bucher, Adrian Koppold, Mattias Kettner, Sarah Kölzer, Julia Dietz, Eric Frodl, Alexey Surov, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Thomas J. Vogl, M. A. Verhoff, M. Beeres, Constantin Lux, Sara Heinbuch","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11080807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to establish a standardized structured workflow to compare findings from high-resolution, optimized reconstructions from post-mortem computed tomography (pmCT) with autopsy results in the detection of fractures of the laryngohyoid complex in strangulation victims. Method: Forty-two strangulation cases were selected, and pmCT scans of the laryngohyoid complex were obtained. Both pmCT scans and autopsy reports were analyzed using a structured template and compared using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) and the McNemar test. The study also compared the prevalence of ossa sesamoidea and non-fusion of the major and minor horns of the hyoid bone between both diagnostic methods. Results: The detection of fractures showed a very good correlation between autopsy and pmCT results (κ = 0.905), with the McNemar test showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. PmCT identified 28 sesamoid bones, 45 non-fusions of the major horns, and 47 non-fusions of the minor horns of the hyoid bone, compared to four, six, and zero, respectively, identified by autopsy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Autopsy and pmCT findings correlate well and can be used in a complementary manner. PmCT is superior to autopsy in identifying dislocations and detecting anatomical variations in the laryngohyoid complex, which can lead to misinterpretations during autopsy. Therefore, we do not advocate replacing autopsy with pmCT but propose using a structured workflow, including our standardized reporting template, for evaluating lesions in the laryngohyoid complex.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Forensic Diagnostics: Structured Reporting of Post-Mortem CT versus Autopsy for Laryngohyoid Complex Fractures in Strangulation\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Bucher, Adrian Koppold, Mattias Kettner, Sarah Kölzer, Julia Dietz, Eric Frodl, Alexey Surov, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Thomas J. Vogl, M. A. Verhoff, M. Beeres, Constantin Lux, Sara Heinbuch\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering11080807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The purpose of this study was to establish a standardized structured workflow to compare findings from high-resolution, optimized reconstructions from post-mortem computed tomography (pmCT) with autopsy results in the detection of fractures of the laryngohyoid complex in strangulation victims. Method: Forty-two strangulation cases were selected, and pmCT scans of the laryngohyoid complex were obtained. Both pmCT scans and autopsy reports were analyzed using a structured template and compared using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) and the McNemar test. The study also compared the prevalence of ossa sesamoidea and non-fusion of the major and minor horns of the hyoid bone between both diagnostic methods. Results: The detection of fractures showed a very good correlation between autopsy and pmCT results (κ = 0.905), with the McNemar test showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. PmCT identified 28 sesamoid bones, 45 non-fusions of the major horns, and 47 non-fusions of the minor horns of the hyoid bone, compared to four, six, and zero, respectively, identified by autopsy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Autopsy and pmCT findings correlate well and can be used in a complementary manner. PmCT is superior to autopsy in identifying dislocations and detecting anatomical variations in the laryngohyoid complex, which can lead to misinterpretations during autopsy. Therefore, we do not advocate replacing autopsy with pmCT but propose using a structured workflow, including our standardized reporting template, for evaluating lesions in the laryngohyoid complex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Forensic Diagnostics: Structured Reporting of Post-Mortem CT versus Autopsy for Laryngohyoid Complex Fractures in Strangulation
Background: The purpose of this study was to establish a standardized structured workflow to compare findings from high-resolution, optimized reconstructions from post-mortem computed tomography (pmCT) with autopsy results in the detection of fractures of the laryngohyoid complex in strangulation victims. Method: Forty-two strangulation cases were selected, and pmCT scans of the laryngohyoid complex were obtained. Both pmCT scans and autopsy reports were analyzed using a structured template and compared using Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) and the McNemar test. The study also compared the prevalence of ossa sesamoidea and non-fusion of the major and minor horns of the hyoid bone between both diagnostic methods. Results: The detection of fractures showed a very good correlation between autopsy and pmCT results (κ = 0.905), with the McNemar test showing no statistically significant difference between the two methods. PmCT identified 28 sesamoid bones, 45 non-fusions of the major horns, and 47 non-fusions of the minor horns of the hyoid bone, compared to four, six, and zero, respectively, identified by autopsy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Autopsy and pmCT findings correlate well and can be used in a complementary manner. PmCT is superior to autopsy in identifying dislocations and detecting anatomical variations in the laryngohyoid complex, which can lead to misinterpretations during autopsy. Therefore, we do not advocate replacing autopsy with pmCT but propose using a structured workflow, including our standardized reporting template, for evaluating lesions in the laryngohyoid complex.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering