圣保罗州销售的有机和非有机蜂蜜的微生物和理化特征

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Food Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.5327/fst.00298
Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, Layara Chuvukian Chinaque, Ana Carolina Gaspar Pescinelli, Evelyn Fernanda Flores Caron, Camila Koutsodontis Cerqueira Cézar, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves PEREIRA, O. A. Martins
{"title":"圣保罗州销售的有机和非有机蜂蜜的微生物和理化特征","authors":"Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, Layara Chuvukian Chinaque, Ana Carolina Gaspar Pescinelli, Evelyn Fernanda Flores Caron, Camila Koutsodontis Cerqueira Cézar, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves PEREIRA, O. A. Martins","doi":"10.5327/fst.00298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the microbiological and physicochemical quality of organic and nonorganic honey sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. A total of 26 samples were analyzed, 10 samples of organic honey (OH) and 16 of non-organic honey (NOH) sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. Physicochemical analyses revealed notable variations in moisture, acidity, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels between OH and NOH. The average moisture content was 17.74 ± 1.47 g/100 g for OH and 18.12 ± 1.73 g/100 g for NOH. Regarding acidity, OH had an average of 26.90 ± 14.58 mEq/kg, while NOH had 34.32 ± 11.22 mEq/kg. Regarding HMF, OH had an average of 23.40 ± 38.70 mg/kg and NOH had 35.82 ± 39.94 mg/kg. Samples showing deviations from legal standards indicate potential processing or storage issues. The Fiehe test indicated possible fraud in one OH sample and four NOH samples. The Lund test showed no precipitation in any samples, suggesting adulteration in all of them. Diastatic enzyme research revealed the absence of enzymes in three samples, indicating adulteration or inadequate processing. The mean counts of mesophiles were 23 CFU/g for OH and 55.33 CFU/g for NOH, while the counts of molds and yeasts were 126.5 CFU/g for OH and 2289 CFU/g for NOH, exceeding recommended limits and raising concerns about product safety. These findings underscore the need for rigorous quality control measures throughout honey production to ensure safety, purity, and authenticity.","PeriodicalId":12404,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology","volume":"52 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of organic and nonorganic honey sold in São Paulo State\",\"authors\":\"Aryele Nunes da Cruz Encide Sampaio, Layara Chuvukian Chinaque, Ana Carolina Gaspar Pescinelli, Evelyn Fernanda Flores Caron, Camila Koutsodontis Cerqueira Cézar, F. S. Possebon, Juliano Gonçalves PEREIRA, O. A. Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.5327/fst.00298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study assesses the microbiological and physicochemical quality of organic and nonorganic honey sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. A total of 26 samples were analyzed, 10 samples of organic honey (OH) and 16 of non-organic honey (NOH) sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. Physicochemical analyses revealed notable variations in moisture, acidity, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels between OH and NOH. The average moisture content was 17.74 ± 1.47 g/100 g for OH and 18.12 ± 1.73 g/100 g for NOH. Regarding acidity, OH had an average of 26.90 ± 14.58 mEq/kg, while NOH had 34.32 ± 11.22 mEq/kg. Regarding HMF, OH had an average of 23.40 ± 38.70 mg/kg and NOH had 35.82 ± 39.94 mg/kg. Samples showing deviations from legal standards indicate potential processing or storage issues. The Fiehe test indicated possible fraud in one OH sample and four NOH samples. The Lund test showed no precipitation in any samples, suggesting adulteration in all of them. Diastatic enzyme research revealed the absence of enzymes in three samples, indicating adulteration or inadequate processing. The mean counts of mesophiles were 23 CFU/g for OH and 55.33 CFU/g for NOH, while the counts of molds and yeasts were 126.5 CFU/g for OH and 2289 CFU/g for NOH, exceeding recommended limits and raising concerns about product safety. These findings underscore the need for rigorous quality control measures throughout honey production to ensure safety, purity, and authenticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"52 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.00298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.00298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了巴西圣保罗州销售的有机蜂蜜和非有机蜂蜜的微生物和理化质量。共分析了 26 个样本,其中 10 个是在巴西圣保罗州销售的有机蜂蜜(OH)样本,16 个是非有机蜂蜜(NOH)样本。理化分析表明,有机蜂蜜和非有机蜂蜜在水分、酸度和羟甲基糠醛(HMF)含量方面存在显著差异。OH 的平均水分含量为 17.74 ± 1.47 克/100 克,NOH 为 18.12 ± 1.73 克/100 克。酸度方面,OH 的平均值为 26.90 ± 14.58 mEq/kg,而 NOH 为 34.32 ± 11.22 mEq/kg。关于 HMF,OH 的平均值为 23.40 ± 38.70 毫克/千克,NOH 为 35.82 ± 39.94 毫克/千克。样品偏离法定标准表明可能存在加工或储存问题。Fiehe 测试表明,一个 OH 样品和四个 NOH 样品可能存在欺诈行为。伦德测试表明,没有任何样品出现沉淀,表明所有样品都掺假。消解酶研究表明,三个样品中没有酶,这表明掺假或加工不当。嗜中性细菌的平均计数为 23 CFU/g(OH)和 55.33 CFU/g(NOH),而霉菌和酵母菌的计数为 126.5 CFU/g(OH)和 2289 CFU/g(NOH),超过了建议限值,引发了对产品安全的担忧。这些发现强调了在整个蜂蜜生产过程中采取严格质量控制措施的必要性,以确保蜂蜜的安全性、纯度和真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of organic and nonorganic honey sold in São Paulo State
This study assesses the microbiological and physicochemical quality of organic and nonorganic honey sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. A total of 26 samples were analyzed, 10 samples of organic honey (OH) and 16 of non-organic honey (NOH) sold in São Paulo State, Brazil. Physicochemical analyses revealed notable variations in moisture, acidity, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels between OH and NOH. The average moisture content was 17.74 ± 1.47 g/100 g for OH and 18.12 ± 1.73 g/100 g for NOH. Regarding acidity, OH had an average of 26.90 ± 14.58 mEq/kg, while NOH had 34.32 ± 11.22 mEq/kg. Regarding HMF, OH had an average of 23.40 ± 38.70 mg/kg and NOH had 35.82 ± 39.94 mg/kg. Samples showing deviations from legal standards indicate potential processing or storage issues. The Fiehe test indicated possible fraud in one OH sample and four NOH samples. The Lund test showed no precipitation in any samples, suggesting adulteration in all of them. Diastatic enzyme research revealed the absence of enzymes in three samples, indicating adulteration or inadequate processing. The mean counts of mesophiles were 23 CFU/g for OH and 55.33 CFU/g for NOH, while the counts of molds and yeasts were 126.5 CFU/g for OH and 2289 CFU/g for NOH, exceeding recommended limits and raising concerns about product safety. These findings underscore the need for rigorous quality control measures throughout honey production to ensure safety, purity, and authenticity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Science and Technology
Food Science and Technology 农林科学-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
From Ocean to Table: Ensuring Seafood Traceability The Clever Guts Diet: How to revolutionise your body from the inside out Cover and contents Editorial and News From the President and IFST News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1