构建胃癌临床患者相似性网络

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Bioengineering Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11080808
Rukui Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Chaoyu Zhu, Hui Cai, Kai Yin, Fan Zhong, Lei Liu
{"title":"构建胃癌临床患者相似性网络","authors":"Rukui Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Chaoyu Zhu, Hui Cai, Kai Yin, Fan Zhong, Lei Liu","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11080808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Clinical molecular genetic testing and molecular imaging dramatically increase the quantity of clinical data. Combined with the extensive application of electronic health records, a medical data ecosystem is forming, which calls for big-data-based medicine models. We tried to use big data analytics to search for similar patients in a cancer cohort, showing how to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to clinical data processing to obtain clinically significant results, with the ultimate goal of improving healthcare management. Methods: In order to overcome the weaknesses of most data processing algorithms that rely on expert labeling and annotation, we uniformly adopted one-hot encoding for all types of clinical data, calculating the Euclidean distance to measure patient similarity and subgrouping via an unsupervised learning model. Overall survival (OS) was investigated to assess the clinical validity and clinical relevance of the model. Results: We took gastric cancers (GCs) as an example to build a high-dimensional clinical patient similarity network (cPSN). When performing the survival analysis, we found that Cluster_2 had the longest survival rates, while Cluster_5 had the worst prognosis among all the subgroups. As patients in the same subgroup share some clinical characteristics, the clinical feature analysis found that Cluster_2 harbored more lower distal GCs than upper proximal GCs, shedding light on the debates. Conclusion: Overall, we constructed a cancer-specific cPSN with excellent interpretability and clinical significance, which would recapitulate patient similarity in the real-world. The constructed cPSN model is scalable, generalizable, and performs well for various data types.","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing a Clinical Patient Similarity Network of Gastric Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Rukui Zhang, Zhaorui Liu, Chaoyu Zhu, Hui Cai, Kai Yin, Fan Zhong, Lei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering11080808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Clinical molecular genetic testing and molecular imaging dramatically increase the quantity of clinical data. Combined with the extensive application of electronic health records, a medical data ecosystem is forming, which calls for big-data-based medicine models. We tried to use big data analytics to search for similar patients in a cancer cohort, showing how to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to clinical data processing to obtain clinically significant results, with the ultimate goal of improving healthcare management. Methods: In order to overcome the weaknesses of most data processing algorithms that rely on expert labeling and annotation, we uniformly adopted one-hot encoding for all types of clinical data, calculating the Euclidean distance to measure patient similarity and subgrouping via an unsupervised learning model. Overall survival (OS) was investigated to assess the clinical validity and clinical relevance of the model. Results: We took gastric cancers (GCs) as an example to build a high-dimensional clinical patient similarity network (cPSN). When performing the survival analysis, we found that Cluster_2 had the longest survival rates, while Cluster_5 had the worst prognosis among all the subgroups. As patients in the same subgroup share some clinical characteristics, the clinical feature analysis found that Cluster_2 harbored more lower distal GCs than upper proximal GCs, shedding light on the debates. Conclusion: Overall, we constructed a cancer-specific cPSN with excellent interpretability and clinical significance, which would recapitulate patient similarity in the real-world. The constructed cPSN model is scalable, generalizable, and performs well for various data types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:临床分子基因检测和分子影像学大大增加了临床数据的数量。再加上电子病历的广泛应用,一个医疗数据生态系统正在形成,这就需要基于大数据的医学模型。我们尝试利用大数据分析来搜索癌症队列中的相似患者,展示如何将人工智能(AI)算法应用于临床数据处理,以获得具有临床意义的结果,最终达到改善医疗管理的目的。方法:为了克服大多数数据处理算法依赖专家标注和注释的弱点,我们对所有类型的临床数据统一采用单次编码,计算欧氏距离来衡量患者的相似性,并通过无监督学习模型进行分组。为了评估该模型的临床有效性和临床相关性,我们对患者的总生存率(OS)进行了调查。结果我们以胃癌(GC)为例,建立了一个高维临床患者相似性网络(cPSN)。在进行生存分析时,我们发现在所有亚组中,Cluster_2 的生存期最长,而 Cluster_5 的预后最差。由于同一亚组的患者具有一些共同的临床特征,临床特征分析发现,Cluster_2 中下部远端 GC 的数量多于上部近端 GC 的数量,从而揭示了这一争论。结论总之,我们构建的癌症特异性 cPSN 具有良好的可解释性和临床意义,可以再现现实世界中患者的相似性。所构建的 cPSN 模型具有可扩展性和通用性,在各种数据类型中表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructing a Clinical Patient Similarity Network of Gastric Cancer
Objectives: Clinical molecular genetic testing and molecular imaging dramatically increase the quantity of clinical data. Combined with the extensive application of electronic health records, a medical data ecosystem is forming, which calls for big-data-based medicine models. We tried to use big data analytics to search for similar patients in a cancer cohort, showing how to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to clinical data processing to obtain clinically significant results, with the ultimate goal of improving healthcare management. Methods: In order to overcome the weaknesses of most data processing algorithms that rely on expert labeling and annotation, we uniformly adopted one-hot encoding for all types of clinical data, calculating the Euclidean distance to measure patient similarity and subgrouping via an unsupervised learning model. Overall survival (OS) was investigated to assess the clinical validity and clinical relevance of the model. Results: We took gastric cancers (GCs) as an example to build a high-dimensional clinical patient similarity network (cPSN). When performing the survival analysis, we found that Cluster_2 had the longest survival rates, while Cluster_5 had the worst prognosis among all the subgroups. As patients in the same subgroup share some clinical characteristics, the clinical feature analysis found that Cluster_2 harbored more lower distal GCs than upper proximal GCs, shedding light on the debates. Conclusion: Overall, we constructed a cancer-specific cPSN with excellent interpretability and clinical significance, which would recapitulate patient similarity in the real-world. The constructed cPSN model is scalable, generalizable, and performs well for various data types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of 'Smart' Dressings for Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection: A Focus on Arthroplasty. Characterization of MSC Growth, Differentiation, and EV Production in CNF Hydrogels Under Static and Dynamic Cultures in Hypoxic and Normoxic Conditions. Mamba- and ResNet-Based Dual-Branch Network for Ultrasound Thyroid Nodule Segmentation. Exploring NRB Biofilm Adhesion and Biocorrosion in Oil/Water Recovery Operations Within Pipelines. Wearable Online Freezing of Gait Detection and Cueing System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1