通过实施 "思考-对子-分享 "策略提高高中生的化学学习成绩

Juliana Nkiru Nnoli
{"title":"通过实施 \"思考-对子-分享 \"策略提高高中生的化学学习成绩","authors":"Juliana Nkiru Nnoli","doi":"10.37256/ser.5220244727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy on students' academic performance in Chemistry at the Awka Education Zone, establishing its significance in addressing persistent poor performance in the subject. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with Chemistry taught to the experimental group via TPS and to the control group by traditional lecture methods. The study’s population consisted of all Chemistry students in public secondary schools within the Awka Education Zone, totalling 1,298 students, from which a sample of 120 students (60 males and 60 females) was drawn using purposive sampling and straightforward balloting. Data were collected using the Achievement in Chemistry Test, a validated instrument with a reliability factor of 0.83. Mean and standard deviation were used to analyze the research questions, while a t-test was used to examine the hypotheses. Results showed that students taught Chemistry using TPS outperformed those taught by lecture. Male students taught using TPS outperformed female students, whereas, with the lecture method, male students also outperformed female students. There was a significant difference in achievement scores between students taught with TPS and those taught with the lecture method, as well as between Male and Female Students taught with TPS. Students of all sexes did badly when taught using the lecture method. The study recommends the implementation of TPS in teaching Chemistry and calls for the provision of resources by the government to enhance its effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":509946,"journal":{"name":"Social Education Research","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students' Academic Performance in Chemistry Through the Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Nkiru Nnoli\",\"doi\":\"10.37256/ser.5220244727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the impact of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy on students' academic performance in Chemistry at the Awka Education Zone, establishing its significance in addressing persistent poor performance in the subject. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with Chemistry taught to the experimental group via TPS and to the control group by traditional lecture methods. The study’s population consisted of all Chemistry students in public secondary schools within the Awka Education Zone, totalling 1,298 students, from which a sample of 120 students (60 males and 60 females) was drawn using purposive sampling and straightforward balloting. Data were collected using the Achievement in Chemistry Test, a validated instrument with a reliability factor of 0.83. Mean and standard deviation were used to analyze the research questions, while a t-test was used to examine the hypotheses. Results showed that students taught Chemistry using TPS outperformed those taught by lecture. Male students taught using TPS outperformed female students, whereas, with the lecture method, male students also outperformed female students. There was a significant difference in achievement scores between students taught with TPS and those taught with the lecture method, as well as between Male and Female Students taught with TPS. Students of all sexes did badly when taught using the lecture method. The study recommends the implementation of TPS in teaching Chemistry and calls for the provision of resources by the government to enhance its effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Education Research\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5220244727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5220244727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了 "思考-对子-分享"(TPS)策略对阿沃卡教育区学生化学学习成绩的影响,确定了该策略在解决该学科长期存在的成绩不佳问题方面的重要意义。研究采用了准实验设计,实验组通过 TPS 进行化学教学,对照组则采用传统的讲授法。研究对象包括阿沃卡教育区公立中学的所有化学学生,共计 1,298 名学生,采用目的性抽样和直接投票法从中抽取了 120 名学生样本(60 名男生和 60 名女生)。数据使用化学成就测验收集,该测验是经过验证的工具,可靠系数为 0.83。平均值和标准差用于分析研究问题,t 检验用于检验假设。结果显示,使用 TPS 教授化学的学生成绩优于使用讲授法教授的学生。使用 TPS 教学的男生成绩优于女生,而使用讲授法教学的男生成绩也优于女生。使用 TPS 教学的学生与使用讲授法教学的学生之间,以及使用 TPS 教学的男生与女生之间,成绩差异很大。使用讲授法教学时,男女学生的成绩都很差。研究建议在化学教学中实施 TPS,并呼吁政府提供资源以提高其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students' Academic Performance in Chemistry Through the Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy
This study investigates the impact of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy on students' academic performance in Chemistry at the Awka Education Zone, establishing its significance in addressing persistent poor performance in the subject. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with Chemistry taught to the experimental group via TPS and to the control group by traditional lecture methods. The study’s population consisted of all Chemistry students in public secondary schools within the Awka Education Zone, totalling 1,298 students, from which a sample of 120 students (60 males and 60 females) was drawn using purposive sampling and straightforward balloting. Data were collected using the Achievement in Chemistry Test, a validated instrument with a reliability factor of 0.83. Mean and standard deviation were used to analyze the research questions, while a t-test was used to examine the hypotheses. Results showed that students taught Chemistry using TPS outperformed those taught by lecture. Male students taught using TPS outperformed female students, whereas, with the lecture method, male students also outperformed female students. There was a significant difference in achievement scores between students taught with TPS and those taught with the lecture method, as well as between Male and Female Students taught with TPS. Students of all sexes did badly when taught using the lecture method. The study recommends the implementation of TPS in teaching Chemistry and calls for the provision of resources by the government to enhance its effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Relevance and Availability of Instructional Materials for Biology Education in Awka South Local Government Area Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students' Academic Performance in Chemistry Through the Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy Evaluating the Impact of Instructional Materials on Social Studies Learning Outcomes in Senior High Schools of the Bono East Region of Ghana Effects of Drug Abuse on the Academic Performance of Students of Selected Tertiary Institutions in Lagos, Nigeria Perceptions of Social Studies Teachers on Teaching Rationale in New Juaben Senior High Schools, Ghana: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1