英国适用于体外诊断检测的指南和法规:范围界定审查

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Innovations Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001238
Magdalena Staworko, Oscar Khawar, Frank Sullivan, Peter D Donnelly, Jon Deeks, Margaret McCartney
{"title":"英国适用于体外诊断检测的指南和法规:范围界定审查","authors":"Magdalena Staworko, Oscar Khawar, Frank Sullivan, Peter D Donnelly, Jon Deeks, Margaret McCartney","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe recommendations applicable to new diagnostic and screening tests brought to market in the UK as of 01 June 2023; and extract agreements, disagreements and gaps.Extant regulations, recommendations and guidelines for new diagnostic and screening tests applicable to new products placed in the UK market as of 01 June 2023. Non-English and references not applicable to new tests seeking market access in the UK on 01 June 2023 were excluded.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus; grey literature via EuropePMC and Google, government regulations and guidelines, and relevant professional societies. References of relevant included data were scanned for includable articles. Resultant data were thematically analysed and presented as a narrative scoping review.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were searched from 1/1/2018 for regulations, guidelines or recommendations for in vitro diagnositic tests as applied to the UK on 1/6/23. Relevant papers also had references searched.943 items were initially identified with 892 excluded. Reference searching located a further 31 papers and 82 items were analysed. Seven themes were identified: regulation, companion diagnostics and lab developed tests, safety and evidence, test specific recommendations, data, innovation and recommendations for patients/the public. Wide agreement included the need to reduce bureaucracy and duplication; to mitigate to avoid unintended consequences of In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation. Disagreement over whether high-quality evidence should precede regulatory approval, or could be gathered as part of postmarketing surveillance emerged.Industry, regulators, academics, patients representing a variety of views, should collaborate to work through areas of disagreement.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines and regulations applicable to vitro diagnostic tests in the UK: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Staworko, Oscar Khawar, Frank Sullivan, Peter D Donnelly, Jon Deeks, Margaret McCartney\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To describe recommendations applicable to new diagnostic and screening tests brought to market in the UK as of 01 June 2023; and extract agreements, disagreements and gaps.Extant regulations, recommendations and guidelines for new diagnostic and screening tests applicable to new products placed in the UK market as of 01 June 2023. Non-English and references not applicable to new tests seeking market access in the UK on 01 June 2023 were excluded.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus; grey literature via EuropePMC and Google, government regulations and guidelines, and relevant professional societies. References of relevant included data were scanned for includable articles. Resultant data were thematically analysed and presented as a narrative scoping review.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were searched from 1/1/2018 for regulations, guidelines or recommendations for in vitro diagnositic tests as applied to the UK on 1/6/23. Relevant papers also had references searched.943 items were initially identified with 892 excluded. Reference searching located a further 31 papers and 82 items were analysed. Seven themes were identified: regulation, companion diagnostics and lab developed tests, safety and evidence, test specific recommendations, data, innovation and recommendations for patients/the public. Wide agreement included the need to reduce bureaucracy and duplication; to mitigate to avoid unintended consequences of In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation. Disagreement over whether high-quality evidence should precede regulatory approval, or could be gathered as part of postmarketing surveillance emerged.Industry, regulators, academics, patients representing a variety of views, should collaborate to work through areas of disagreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2024-001238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

描述适用于 2023 年 6 月 1 日之前在英国上市的新诊断和筛查检验的建议;并提取协议、分歧和差距。PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection 和 Scopus;通过 EuropePMC 和 Google 收集的灰色文献、政府法规和指南以及相关专业协会。对相关收录数据的参考文献进行了扫描,以查找可收录的文章。从2018年1月1日起,在PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection和Scopus上搜索体外诊断检测的法规、指南或建议,这些法规、指南或建议于23年6月1日适用于英国。相关论文的参考文献也进行了检索。初步确定了 943 项内容,其中 892 项被排除。参考文献搜索又找到了 31 篇论文,对其中 82 个项目进行了分析。确定了七个主题:监管、辅助诊断和实验室开发的检测、安全性和证据、特定检测建议、数据、创新和对患者/公众的建议。广泛认同的观点包括:需要减少官僚主义和重复工作;减轻以避免体外诊断监管带来意想不到的后果。业界、监管机构、学术界、代表各种观点的患者应通力合作,消除分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidelines and regulations applicable to vitro diagnostic tests in the UK: a scoping review
To describe recommendations applicable to new diagnostic and screening tests brought to market in the UK as of 01 June 2023; and extract agreements, disagreements and gaps.Extant regulations, recommendations and guidelines for new diagnostic and screening tests applicable to new products placed in the UK market as of 01 June 2023. Non-English and references not applicable to new tests seeking market access in the UK on 01 June 2023 were excluded.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus; grey literature via EuropePMC and Google, government regulations and guidelines, and relevant professional societies. References of relevant included data were scanned for includable articles. Resultant data were thematically analysed and presented as a narrative scoping review.PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus were searched from 1/1/2018 for regulations, guidelines or recommendations for in vitro diagnositic tests as applied to the UK on 1/6/23. Relevant papers also had references searched.943 items were initially identified with 892 excluded. Reference searching located a further 31 papers and 82 items were analysed. Seven themes were identified: regulation, companion diagnostics and lab developed tests, safety and evidence, test specific recommendations, data, innovation and recommendations for patients/the public. Wide agreement included the need to reduce bureaucracy and duplication; to mitigate to avoid unintended consequences of In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation. Disagreement over whether high-quality evidence should precede regulatory approval, or could be gathered as part of postmarketing surveillance emerged.Industry, regulators, academics, patients representing a variety of views, should collaborate to work through areas of disagreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Innovations
BMJ Innovations Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical analysis of delivering chest compressions in virtual reality simulation: preliminary insights into fidelity and validity of virtual reality as a means of delivering life support training iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report Guidelines and regulations applicable to vitro diagnostic tests in the UK: a scoping review Spreading and scaling innovation and improvement: understanding why the differences matter Stanford Emergency Medicine Partnership Program: a novel approach to streamlining the evaluation and implementation of emerging health technologies through academic–industry partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1