观看讲解视频是否有助于学习后续课文?- 仅在提供提示问题时

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101988
Marie-Christin Krebs, Katharina Braschoß, Alexander Eitel
{"title":"观看讲解视频是否有助于学习后续课文?- 仅在提供提示问题时","authors":"Marie-Christin Krebs,&nbsp;Katharina Braschoß,&nbsp;Alexander Eitel","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Learning with explainer videos can foster learning. However, their effects on subsequent learning are still unclear. On the one hand, they might increase situational interest and scaffold subsequent learning. On the other hand, they might hinder subsequent learning by fostering an illusion of understanding. In case of the latter, the question arises of whether providing prompt-questions after an explainer video would prevent an illusion of understanding. Therefore, we investigated the effects of medium and prompt-questions on subsequent learning with text.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>One hundred thirty-three teacher students and psychology students from a German university.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In an online study with a 2x2 between-subjects design, we investigated the effects of medium (video vs. video-script) in learning phase 1 and prompt-questions (yes vs. no) on subsequent learning with text.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As expected, watching the video made the content seem more interesting and less difficult. Contrary to the illusion-of-understanding-assumption, this did not result in learners overestimating but rather underestimating themselves. Moreover, while prompt-questions in the video condition fostered learning, they impaired learning in the video-script condition. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that in the prompt condition, the superiority of the video was mainly driven by the quality of the prompt-answers rather than the time learners invested in answering the prompt-questions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that explainer videos combined with prompt-questions can foster learning with subsequent text. However, further research is necessary to replicate the findings under more controlled conditions and to investigate the underlying processes in greater depth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101988"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does watching an explainer video help learning with subsequent text? – Only when prompt-questions are provided\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Christin Krebs,&nbsp;Katharina Braschoß,&nbsp;Alexander Eitel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Learning with explainer videos can foster learning. However, their effects on subsequent learning are still unclear. On the one hand, they might increase situational interest and scaffold subsequent learning. On the other hand, they might hinder subsequent learning by fostering an illusion of understanding. In case of the latter, the question arises of whether providing prompt-questions after an explainer video would prevent an illusion of understanding. Therefore, we investigated the effects of medium and prompt-questions on subsequent learning with text.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>One hundred thirty-three teacher students and psychology students from a German university.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In an online study with a 2x2 between-subjects design, we investigated the effects of medium (video vs. video-script) in learning phase 1 and prompt-questions (yes vs. no) on subsequent learning with text.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As expected, watching the video made the content seem more interesting and less difficult. Contrary to the illusion-of-understanding-assumption, this did not result in learners overestimating but rather underestimating themselves. Moreover, while prompt-questions in the video condition fostered learning, they impaired learning in the video-script condition. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that in the prompt condition, the superiority of the video was mainly driven by the quality of the prompt-answers rather than the time learners invested in answering the prompt-questions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that explainer videos combined with prompt-questions can foster learning with subsequent text. However, further research is necessary to replicate the findings under more controlled conditions and to investigate the underlying processes in greater depth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001154\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过解说视频学习可以促进学习。然而,它们对后续学习的影响尚不明确。一方面,它们可能会提高情景兴趣,为后续学习提供支架。另一方面,它们可能会造成理解的错觉,从而阻碍后续学习。如果是后者,那么问题就来了,在讲解视频后提供提示性问题是否能防止出现理解错觉。因此,我们研究了媒介和提示问题对后续文字学习的影响。研究对象为德国一所大学的 133 名师范生和心理学学生。在一项采用 2x2 主体间设计的在线研究中,我们调查了学习阶段 1 的媒介(视频与视频脚本)和提示问题(是与否)对后续文字学习的影响。不出所料,观看视频会让内容看起来更有趣,难度也更低。与 "理解错觉 "假设相反,这并没有导致学习者高估自己,而是低估了自己。此外,在视频条件下,提示性问题促进了学习,而在视频脚本条件下,提示性问题却影响了学习。探索性中介分析表明,在提示条件下,视频的优越性主要取决于提示答案的质量,而不是学习者在回答提示问题时投入的时间。我们的研究结果表明,讲解视频与提示问题相结合可以促进学习者对后续文本的学习。然而,我们还需要进一步的研究,以便在更加可控的条件下复制这些发现,并更深入地研究其背后的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does watching an explainer video help learning with subsequent text? – Only when prompt-questions are provided

Background

Learning with explainer videos can foster learning. However, their effects on subsequent learning are still unclear. On the one hand, they might increase situational interest and scaffold subsequent learning. On the other hand, they might hinder subsequent learning by fostering an illusion of understanding. In case of the latter, the question arises of whether providing prompt-questions after an explainer video would prevent an illusion of understanding. Therefore, we investigated the effects of medium and prompt-questions on subsequent learning with text.

Sample

One hundred thirty-three teacher students and psychology students from a German university.

Methods

In an online study with a 2x2 between-subjects design, we investigated the effects of medium (video vs. video-script) in learning phase 1 and prompt-questions (yes vs. no) on subsequent learning with text.

Results

As expected, watching the video made the content seem more interesting and less difficult. Contrary to the illusion-of-understanding-assumption, this did not result in learners overestimating but rather underestimating themselves. Moreover, while prompt-questions in the video condition fostered learning, they impaired learning in the video-script condition. Exploratory mediation analyses revealed that in the prompt condition, the superiority of the video was mainly driven by the quality of the prompt-answers rather than the time learners invested in answering the prompt-questions.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that explainer videos combined with prompt-questions can foster learning with subsequent text. However, further research is necessary to replicate the findings under more controlled conditions and to investigate the underlying processes in greater depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1