为痴呆症照护者提供建议:文献评论

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Studies Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101251
Emily K. Abel
{"title":"为痴呆症照护者提供建议:文献评论","authors":"Emily K. Abel","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although hundreds of advice manuals for dementia carers have been published, most have serious limitations. They emphasize the various problems family members experience without noting the social and political context within which caring unfolds. As a result, they eschew structural reforms in favor of individual solutions, including self-care. The manuals also encourage carers to detach emotionally from people with dementia by viewing them in terms of their disease. In addition, the books hew so closely to the medical model of dementia that they ignore newer perspectives. Narratives by people with dementia provide a critical corrective. Those works argue that the disproportionate attention directed toward carers has eclipsed the perspective of people with dementia, that people remain individuals despite a dementia diagnosis, that issues of stigma and discrimination shape the experience of living with dementia, that more emphasis should be placed on promoting the autonomy of people with dementia, that they are entitled to reasonable accommodations, and that they should have more opportunities for growth.</p><p>I have reviewed the policies detailed in the guide and have no competing interests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advice for dementia carers: A critique of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Emily K. Abel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although hundreds of advice manuals for dementia carers have been published, most have serious limitations. They emphasize the various problems family members experience without noting the social and political context within which caring unfolds. As a result, they eschew structural reforms in favor of individual solutions, including self-care. The manuals also encourage carers to detach emotionally from people with dementia by viewing them in terms of their disease. In addition, the books hew so closely to the medical model of dementia that they ignore newer perspectives. Narratives by people with dementia provide a critical corrective. Those works argue that the disproportionate attention directed toward carers has eclipsed the perspective of people with dementia, that people remain individuals despite a dementia diagnosis, that issues of stigma and discrimination shape the experience of living with dementia, that more emphasis should be placed on promoting the autonomy of people with dementia, that they are entitled to reasonable accommodations, and that they should have more opportunities for growth.</p><p>I have reviewed the policies detailed in the guide and have no competing interests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089040652400046X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089040652400046X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管针对痴呆症照护者的建议手册已经出版了数百种,但大多数都存在严重的局限性。它们只强调家庭成员遇到的各种问题,却没有注意到护理工作开展的社会和政治背景。因此,它们回避了结构性改革,而倾向于个人解决方案,包括自我护理。这些手册还鼓励照护者从疾病的角度来看待痴呆症患者,从而在情感上脱离他们。此外,这些书籍过于拘泥于痴呆症的医学模式,而忽略了新的视角。痴呆症患者的叙述提供了一种批判性的纠正。这些作品认为,对照护者的过度关注使痴呆症患者的视角黯然失色,尽管被诊断出患有痴呆症,但他们仍然是独立的个体,污名化和歧视问题决定了痴呆症患者的生活体验,应该更加重视促进痴呆症患者的自主性,他们有权获得合理的便利,他们应该有更多的成长机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advice for dementia carers: A critique of the literature

Although hundreds of advice manuals for dementia carers have been published, most have serious limitations. They emphasize the various problems family members experience without noting the social and political context within which caring unfolds. As a result, they eschew structural reforms in favor of individual solutions, including self-care. The manuals also encourage carers to detach emotionally from people with dementia by viewing them in terms of their disease. In addition, the books hew so closely to the medical model of dementia that they ignore newer perspectives. Narratives by people with dementia provide a critical corrective. Those works argue that the disproportionate attention directed toward carers has eclipsed the perspective of people with dementia, that people remain individuals despite a dementia diagnosis, that issues of stigma and discrimination shape the experience of living with dementia, that more emphasis should be placed on promoting the autonomy of people with dementia, that they are entitled to reasonable accommodations, and that they should have more opportunities for growth.

I have reviewed the policies detailed in the guide and have no competing interests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Aging together-with: The growing older of humans, non-humans and more-than-humans. A commentary Hidden in plain sight: Women and gendered dementia dynamics in the Australian Aged Care Royal Commission Four modes of embodiment in later life “Aging well” in knowledge-intensive service professions in Sweden – The idealization of youth in neoliberal labor markets Social engagement among older women in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1