通过韦伯定律讨价还价

V. G. Bardakhchyan, A. E. Allahverdyan
{"title":"通过韦伯定律讨价还价","authors":"V. G. Bardakhchyan, A. E. Allahverdyan","doi":"arxiv-2408.02492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We solve the two-player bargaining problem using Weber's law in\npsychophysics, which is applied to the perception of utility changes. By\napplying this law, one of the players (or both of them) defines lower and upper\nutility thresholds, such that once the lower threshold is established,\nbargaining continues in the inter-threshold domain where the solutions are\nacceptable to both parties. This provides a sequential solution to the\nbargaining problem, and it can be implemented iteratively reaching well-defined\noutcomes. The solution is Pareto-optimal, symmetric, and is invariant to\naffine-transformations of utilities. For susceptible players, iterations are\nunnecessary, so they converge in one stage toward the (axiomatic) Nash solution\nof the bargaining problem. This situation also accounts for the asymmetric Nash\nsolution, where the weights of each player are expressed via their Weber\nconstants. Thus the Nash solution is reached without external arbiters and\nwithout requiring the independence of irrelevant alternatives. For\nnon-susceptible players our approach leads to different results.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bargaining via Weber's law\",\"authors\":\"V. G. Bardakhchyan, A. E. Allahverdyan\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.02492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We solve the two-player bargaining problem using Weber's law in\\npsychophysics, which is applied to the perception of utility changes. By\\napplying this law, one of the players (or both of them) defines lower and upper\\nutility thresholds, such that once the lower threshold is established,\\nbargaining continues in the inter-threshold domain where the solutions are\\nacceptable to both parties. This provides a sequential solution to the\\nbargaining problem, and it can be implemented iteratively reaching well-defined\\noutcomes. The solution is Pareto-optimal, symmetric, and is invariant to\\naffine-transformations of utilities. For susceptible players, iterations are\\nunnecessary, so they converge in one stage toward the (axiomatic) Nash solution\\nof the bargaining problem. This situation also accounts for the asymmetric Nash\\nsolution, where the weights of each player are expressed via their Weber\\nconstants. Thus the Nash solution is reached without external arbiters and\\nwithout requiring the independence of irrelevant alternatives. For\\nnon-susceptible players our approach leads to different results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用心理物理学中的韦伯定律来解决双人讨价还价问题,该定律适用于对效用变化的感知。通过应用该定律,其中一方(或双方)定义了效用的下限和上限,这样一旦下限确定,讨价还价就会在双方都能接受的阈值间领域继续进行。这就为讨价还价问题提供了一个连续的解决方案,它可以通过迭代实现,达到明确定义的结果。该解决方案是帕累托最优的、对称的,并且对效用的咖啡因变换保持不变。对于易受影响的博弈者来说,迭代是不必要的,因此他们会在一个阶段内收敛到讨价还价问题的(公理)纳什解。这种情况也是非对称纳什解的原因,在非对称纳什解中,每个博弈者的权重都是通过他们的韦伯常数来表示的。因此,纳什解的达成不需要外部仲裁者,也不需要无关替代方案的独立性。对于非受影响的博弈者,我们的方法会导致不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bargaining via Weber's law
We solve the two-player bargaining problem using Weber's law in psychophysics, which is applied to the perception of utility changes. By applying this law, one of the players (or both of them) defines lower and upper utility thresholds, such that once the lower threshold is established, bargaining continues in the inter-threshold domain where the solutions are acceptable to both parties. This provides a sequential solution to the bargaining problem, and it can be implemented iteratively reaching well-defined outcomes. The solution is Pareto-optimal, symmetric, and is invariant to affine-transformations of utilities. For susceptible players, iterations are unnecessary, so they converge in one stage toward the (axiomatic) Nash solution of the bargaining problem. This situation also accounts for the asymmetric Nash solution, where the weights of each player are expressed via their Weber constants. Thus the Nash solution is reached without external arbiters and without requiring the independence of irrelevant alternatives. For non-susceptible players our approach leads to different results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert Classification Aggregation Approximately Optimal Auctions With a Strong Bidder Beyond Rationality: Unveiling the Role of Animal Spirits and Inflation Extrapolation in Central Bank Communication of the US The Extreme Points of Fusions A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to Adam Smith's Labor Theory of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1