非常规长壁面板布局的地面沉降响应研究

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s40789-024-00719-4
Pengfei Wang, Zhuang Zhu, Linfeng Guo, Huixian Wang, Yue Qu, Yaoxiong Zhang, Linwei Wang, Hua Wang
{"title":"非常规长壁面板布局的地面沉降响应研究","authors":"Pengfei Wang, Zhuang Zhu, Linfeng Guo, Huixian Wang, Yue Qu, Yaoxiong Zhang, Linwei Wang, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40789-024-00719-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ground subsidence caused by extraction of longwall panels has always been a great concern all over the world. Conventional longwall mining system (CLMS) gives rise to wavy subsidence causing great damage to surface structures. A coal mine in Shanxi, China, utilizes a split-level longwall layout (SLL) for a sub-horizontal No. 8 coal seam to improve the cavability of mudstone interlayer and top coal. This layout, however, also produced unexpectedly favorable surface subsidence. Subsidence of No. 6 and No. 8 longwall panels was monitored while mining was conducted. Field instrumentation and numerical simulation were carried out. It is demonstrated that an asymmetric subsidence profile with stepped subsidence and cracks occurred on the tailgate side but relatively mild and smooth deformation on the other. Due to elimination of conventional parallelepiped gate pillar, No. 6 and No. 8 gobs were connected. Extraction of two SLL panels acted as one supercritical panel. The maximum possible subsidence was reached which lowers the likelihood of potential future secondary subsidence as underground gob fractures and voids have closed. Therefore, SLL is more favorable for post-mining land reuse as gobs are more consolidated underground.</p>","PeriodicalId":53469,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of ground subsidence response to an unconventional longwall panel layout\",\"authors\":\"Pengfei Wang, Zhuang Zhu, Linfeng Guo, Huixian Wang, Yue Qu, Yaoxiong Zhang, Linwei Wang, Hua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40789-024-00719-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ground subsidence caused by extraction of longwall panels has always been a great concern all over the world. Conventional longwall mining system (CLMS) gives rise to wavy subsidence causing great damage to surface structures. A coal mine in Shanxi, China, utilizes a split-level longwall layout (SLL) for a sub-horizontal No. 8 coal seam to improve the cavability of mudstone interlayer and top coal. This layout, however, also produced unexpectedly favorable surface subsidence. Subsidence of No. 6 and No. 8 longwall panels was monitored while mining was conducted. Field instrumentation and numerical simulation were carried out. It is demonstrated that an asymmetric subsidence profile with stepped subsidence and cracks occurred on the tailgate side but relatively mild and smooth deformation on the other. Due to elimination of conventional parallelepiped gate pillar, No. 6 and No. 8 gobs were connected. Extraction of two SLL panels acted as one supercritical panel. The maximum possible subsidence was reached which lowers the likelihood of potential future secondary subsidence as underground gob fractures and voids have closed. Therefore, SLL is more favorable for post-mining land reuse as gobs are more consolidated underground.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00719-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00719-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长壁开采造成的地面沉降一直是全世界都非常关注的问题。传统的长壁开采系统(CLMS)会产生波浪形沉降,对地表结构造成巨大破坏。中国山西的一个煤矿在 8 号煤层采用了分层长壁布置(SLL),以改善泥岩夹层和顶煤的可采性。然而,这种布局也产生了意想不到的地表下沉。在开采过程中,对 6 号和 8 号长壁面板的下沉进行了监测。进行了现场仪器测量和数值模拟。结果表明,不对称下沉剖面在尾板一侧出现了阶梯状下沉和裂缝,而在另一侧则出现了相对温和、平滑的变形。由于取消了传统的平行管状闸门支柱,6 号和 8 号闸门被连接起来。两个 SLL 面板的抽取就像一个超临界面板。由于地下岩块裂缝和空隙已经闭合,因此达到了最大可能的下沉量,降低了未来可能出现的二次下沉的可能性。因此,SLL 更有利于开采后的土地再利用,因为地下岩块更加坚固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of ground subsidence response to an unconventional longwall panel layout

Ground subsidence caused by extraction of longwall panels has always been a great concern all over the world. Conventional longwall mining system (CLMS) gives rise to wavy subsidence causing great damage to surface structures. A coal mine in Shanxi, China, utilizes a split-level longwall layout (SLL) for a sub-horizontal No. 8 coal seam to improve the cavability of mudstone interlayer and top coal. This layout, however, also produced unexpectedly favorable surface subsidence. Subsidence of No. 6 and No. 8 longwall panels was monitored while mining was conducted. Field instrumentation and numerical simulation were carried out. It is demonstrated that an asymmetric subsidence profile with stepped subsidence and cracks occurred on the tailgate side but relatively mild and smooth deformation on the other. Due to elimination of conventional parallelepiped gate pillar, No. 6 and No. 8 gobs were connected. Extraction of two SLL panels acted as one supercritical panel. The maximum possible subsidence was reached which lowers the likelihood of potential future secondary subsidence as underground gob fractures and voids have closed. Therefore, SLL is more favorable for post-mining land reuse as gobs are more consolidated underground.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.40%
发文量
678
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal that focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development. It serves as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the field. The journal covers a range of topics including coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology. It also covers coal mining theory, technology, and engineering, as well as coal processing, utilization, and conversion. Additionally, the journal explores coal mining environment and reclamation, along with related aspects. The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs. This means that authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
期刊最新文献
Coal ash resources and potential for rare earth element production in the United States Ecological environment quality assessment of coal mining cities based on GEE platform: A case study of Shuozhou, China Study on signal characteristics of burst tendency coal under different loading rates Image-based quantitative probing of 3D heterogeneous pore structure in CBM reservoir and permeability estimation with pore network modeling Spectral signatures of solvent-extracted macromolecules in Indian coals of different rank: Insights from fluorescence excitation-emission matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1