EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt
{"title":"改进生态科学的四步贝叶斯工作流程","authors":"EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt","doi":"arxiv-2408.02603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive\nmodels. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to\nyield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of\necological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are\ngrowing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take\nadvantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust\nmodels. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical\nanalyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the\nincreasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages\nsimulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more\nfully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are\nmore robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us\nto refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and\nbetter forecasts.","PeriodicalId":501266,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A four-step Bayesian workflow for improving ecological science\",\"authors\":\"EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.02603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive\\nmodels. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to\\nyield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of\\necological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are\\ngrowing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take\\nadvantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust\\nmodels. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical\\nanalyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the\\nincreasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages\\nsimulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more\\nfully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are\\nmore robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us\\nto refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and\\nbetter forecasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A four-step Bayesian workflow for improving ecological science
Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive
models. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to
yield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of
ecological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are
growing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take
advantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust
models. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical
analyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the
increasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages
simulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more
fully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are
more robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us
to refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and
better forecasts.