改进生态科学的四步贝叶斯工作流程

EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt
{"title":"改进生态科学的四步贝叶斯工作流程","authors":"EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt","doi":"arxiv-2408.02603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive\nmodels. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to\nyield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of\necological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are\ngrowing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take\nadvantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust\nmodels. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical\nanalyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the\nincreasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages\nsimulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more\nfully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are\nmore robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us\nto refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and\nbetter forecasts.","PeriodicalId":501266,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A four-step Bayesian workflow for improving ecological science\",\"authors\":\"EM Wolkovich, T Jonathan Davies, William D Pearse, Michael Betancourt\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.02603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive\\nmodels. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to\\nyield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of\\necological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are\\ngrowing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take\\nadvantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust\\nmodels. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical\\nanalyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the\\nincreasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages\\nsimulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more\\nfully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are\\nmore robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us\\nto refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and\\nbetter forecasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Quantitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日益增长的人为压力增加了对稳健预测模型的需求。要满足这一需求,就必须采用能够处理更多数据、能够捕捉到生态系统的变异性和潜在不确定性的预测方法。贝叶斯模型尤其擅长于此,在生态学中的应用也越来越广泛。然而,当今许多生态学家并没有接受过培训,无法利用更大的生态数据来生成更灵活、更稳健的模型。在这里,我们描述了一种可广泛推广的统计分析工作流程,并展示了它如何能加强生态学方面的培训。这种方法以许多生态学家日益增长的计算工具包为基础,利用模拟将模型构建和经验数据测试与生态理论更有效地结合起来。反过来,这种工作流程也能拟合出更稳健、更适合提供新生态见解的模型--让我们可以调整资源投放的方向,以获得更好的估计、更好的模型和更好的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A four-step Bayesian workflow for improving ecological science
Growing anthropogenic pressures have increased the need for robust predictive models. Meeting this demand requires approaches that can handle bigger data to yield forecasts that capture the variability and underlying uncertainty of ecological systems. Bayesian models are especially adept at this and are growing in use in ecology. Yet many ecologists today are not trained to take advantage of the bigger ecological data needed to generate more flexible robust models. Here we describe a broadly generalizable workflow for statistical analyses and show how it can enhance training in ecology. Building on the increasingly computational toolkit of many ecologists, this approach leverages simulation to integrate model building and testing for empirical data more fully with ecological theory. In turn this workflow can fit models that are more robust and well-suited to provide new ecological insights -- allowing us to refine where to put resources for better estimates, better models, and better forecasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunities Automating proton PBS treatment planning for head and neck cancers using policy gradient-based deep reinforcement learning A computational framework for optimal and Model Predictive Control of stochastic gene regulatory networks Active learning for energy-based antibody optimization and enhanced screening Comorbid anxiety symptoms predict lower odds of improvement in depression symptoms during smartphone-delivered psychotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1