Rongshui Qin, Chenchen Shi, Tao Yu, Chao Ding, Jing Zhan, Yan Jiao, Zelong Zhang
{"title":"基于 AHP-熵权 TOPSIS 的聚氨酯泡沫火灾危险综合评估","authors":"Rongshui Qin, Chenchen Shi, Tao Yu, Chao Ding, Jing Zhan, Yan Jiao, Zelong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study introduces an innovative evaluation framework synergizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to analyze the fire hazards associated with various types of polyurethane foam. By integrating subjective and objective assessments through the AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, it transcends the limitations of traditional evaluation techniques, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. Leveraging data from cone calorimeter tests, a detailed hierarchy of fire behavior indicators is established, prioritizing heat release rates and toxic gas emissions as key factors in assessing fire risk. The application of this multi-faceted evaluation framework to five distinct polyurethane materials reveals a clear ranking of fire hazards, highlighting the critical importance of selecting appropriate flame-retardant additives. According to the composite score index evaluated by AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, the study concludes that the materials fire hazards are ranked as follows: PU (0.6927) exhibits the highest fire hazard, followed by PU/14APP/1B<sub>4</sub>F (0.6044), PU/14APP/1PMA (0.5634), PU/15APP (0.4010), and PU/15BIO (0.3421) presenting the lowest fire hazard among the materials evaluated. This research contributes invaluable insights into fire hazard assessment, guiding material scientists and engineers toward safer polyurethane formulations and advancing the field of fire safety engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive assessment of fire hazard for polyurethane foam based on AHP-entropy-weighted TOPSIS\",\"authors\":\"Rongshui Qin, Chenchen Shi, Tao Yu, Chao Ding, Jing Zhan, Yan Jiao, Zelong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study introduces an innovative evaluation framework synergizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to analyze the fire hazards associated with various types of polyurethane foam. By integrating subjective and objective assessments through the AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, it transcends the limitations of traditional evaluation techniques, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. Leveraging data from cone calorimeter tests, a detailed hierarchy of fire behavior indicators is established, prioritizing heat release rates and toxic gas emissions as key factors in assessing fire risk. The application of this multi-faceted evaluation framework to five distinct polyurethane materials reveals a clear ranking of fire hazards, highlighting the critical importance of selecting appropriate flame-retardant additives. According to the composite score index evaluated by AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, the study concludes that the materials fire hazards are ranked as follows: PU (0.6927) exhibits the highest fire hazard, followed by PU/14APP/1B<sub>4</sub>F (0.6044), PU/14APP/1PMA (0.5634), PU/15APP (0.4010), and PU/15BIO (0.3421) presenting the lowest fire hazard among the materials evaluated. This research contributes invaluable insights into fire hazard assessment, guiding material scientists and engineers toward safer polyurethane formulations and advancing the field of fire safety engineering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13435-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comprehensive assessment of fire hazard for polyurethane foam based on AHP-entropy-weighted TOPSIS
This study introduces an innovative evaluation framework synergizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy method, and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to analyze the fire hazards associated with various types of polyurethane foam. By integrating subjective and objective assessments through the AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, it transcends the limitations of traditional evaluation techniques, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. Leveraging data from cone calorimeter tests, a detailed hierarchy of fire behavior indicators is established, prioritizing heat release rates and toxic gas emissions as key factors in assessing fire risk. The application of this multi-faceted evaluation framework to five distinct polyurethane materials reveals a clear ranking of fire hazards, highlighting the critical importance of selecting appropriate flame-retardant additives. According to the composite score index evaluated by AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method, the study concludes that the materials fire hazards are ranked as follows: PU (0.6927) exhibits the highest fire hazard, followed by PU/14APP/1B4F (0.6044), PU/14APP/1PMA (0.5634), PU/15APP (0.4010), and PU/15BIO (0.3421) presenting the lowest fire hazard among the materials evaluated. This research contributes invaluable insights into fire hazard assessment, guiding material scientists and engineers toward safer polyurethane formulations and advancing the field of fire safety engineering.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews.
The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.