系统分析机器学习在安全关键型系统中应用的学术界与业界观点之间的差距

IF 2.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES IEEE Transactions on Education Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1109/TE.2024.3403792
Anwesa Das;Vinay Kumar;Aditya Narayan Hati;Sharda Bharti
{"title":"系统分析机器学习在安全关键型系统中应用的学术界与业界观点之间的差距","authors":"Anwesa Das;Vinay Kumar;Aditya Narayan Hati;Sharda Bharti","doi":"10.1109/TE.2024.3403792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning (ML) is increasingly utilized in the development and assurance of safety-critical systems (SCSs) nowadays, much like other complex problems. Safety is the topmost priority in SCS, hence, developers who are working in this area must possess extensive knowledge of both ML and SCS. This article presents a methodical investigation that surveys engineering students and professionals in the industry to identify the disparities between the knowledge of students and the industry’s expectations during interviews with undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students. The research questions (RQs) were developed based on the student’s proficiency in ML and SCSs, as well as the industry’s expertise in these areas. These questions were then analyzed to determine the factors contributing to the knowledge gap. In this study, a rigorous survey was carried out using two sets of questionnaires. The first set was distributed among UG and PG students from various government-sponsored and top private institutions in India who were preparing for job interviews. The second set was distributed among industry experts involved in recruiting these students. The responses from both sets of questionnaires were thoroughly analyzed to assess the students’ knowledge against the industry’s expectations for superior post-placement performance. The study revealed a substantial gap between the students’ knowledge and the industry’s expectations, underscoring the critical need for students to acquire a comprehensive understanding of SCSs and ML applications to effectively meet the industry’s requirements upon joining the organization.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":"67 6","pages":"889-896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Analysis of the Gap Between Academia and Industry Perspectives on Machine Learning Applications in Safety-Critical Systems\",\"authors\":\"Anwesa Das;Vinay Kumar;Aditya Narayan Hati;Sharda Bharti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TE.2024.3403792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning (ML) is increasingly utilized in the development and assurance of safety-critical systems (SCSs) nowadays, much like other complex problems. Safety is the topmost priority in SCS, hence, developers who are working in this area must possess extensive knowledge of both ML and SCS. This article presents a methodical investigation that surveys engineering students and professionals in the industry to identify the disparities between the knowledge of students and the industry’s expectations during interviews with undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students. The research questions (RQs) were developed based on the student’s proficiency in ML and SCSs, as well as the industry’s expertise in these areas. These questions were then analyzed to determine the factors contributing to the knowledge gap. In this study, a rigorous survey was carried out using two sets of questionnaires. The first set was distributed among UG and PG students from various government-sponsored and top private institutions in India who were preparing for job interviews. The second set was distributed among industry experts involved in recruiting these students. The responses from both sets of questionnaires were thoroughly analyzed to assess the students’ knowledge against the industry’s expectations for superior post-placement performance. The study revealed a substantial gap between the students’ knowledge and the industry’s expectations, underscoring the critical need for students to acquire a comprehensive understanding of SCSs and ML applications to effectively meet the industry’s requirements upon joining the organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"volume\":\"67 6\",\"pages\":\"889-896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10555412/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10555412/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,机器学习(ML)越来越多地用于安全关键系统(scs)的开发和保证,就像其他复杂问题一样。安全是SCS的首要任务,因此,在这个领域工作的开发人员必须具备ML和SCS的广泛知识。本文提出了一项系统调查,调查了工程专业学生和业内专业人士,以确定本科生(UG)和研究生(PG)面试时学生的知识与行业期望之间的差异。研究问题(RQs)是根据学生对ML和scs的熟练程度以及行业在这些领域的专业知识开发的。然后对这些问题进行分析,以确定导致知识差距的因素。在本研究中,采用两套问卷进行了严格的调查。第一套是在印度各政府资助和顶级私立机构准备参加工作面试的本科生和研究生中分发的。第二组分配给参与招募这些学生的行业专家。我们对两组问卷的回答进行了全面的分析,以评估学生的知识水平与行业对就业后卓越表现的期望。该研究显示,学生的知识与行业期望之间存在巨大差距,强调学生在加入组织时迫切需要全面了解scs和机器学习应用,以有效满足行业要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Analysis of the Gap Between Academia and Industry Perspectives on Machine Learning Applications in Safety-Critical Systems
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly utilized in the development and assurance of safety-critical systems (SCSs) nowadays, much like other complex problems. Safety is the topmost priority in SCS, hence, developers who are working in this area must possess extensive knowledge of both ML and SCS. This article presents a methodical investigation that surveys engineering students and professionals in the industry to identify the disparities between the knowledge of students and the industry’s expectations during interviews with undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students. The research questions (RQs) were developed based on the student’s proficiency in ML and SCSs, as well as the industry’s expertise in these areas. These questions were then analyzed to determine the factors contributing to the knowledge gap. In this study, a rigorous survey was carried out using two sets of questionnaires. The first set was distributed among UG and PG students from various government-sponsored and top private institutions in India who were preparing for job interviews. The second set was distributed among industry experts involved in recruiting these students. The responses from both sets of questionnaires were thoroughly analyzed to assess the students’ knowledge against the industry’s expectations for superior post-placement performance. The study revealed a substantial gap between the students’ knowledge and the industry’s expectations, underscoring the critical need for students to acquire a comprehensive understanding of SCSs and ML applications to effectively meet the industry’s requirements upon joining the organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Education
IEEE Transactions on Education 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Education Publication Information Guest Editorial Coding, Computational, Algorithmic, Design, Creative, and Critical Thinking in K–16 Education IEEE Transactions on Education Information for Authors The Universal Micro-Credential Framework: The Role of Badges, Micro-Credentials, Skills Profiling, and Design Patterns in Developing Interdisciplinary Learning and Assessment Paths for Computing Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1