厘清植物共同入侵的影响:相加、拮抗和协同作用

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s10530-024-03411-5
Showkeen Ahmad Lone, Rameez Ahmed, Bilal Ahmad Rasray, Irfan Rashid, Martin Andres Nuñez, Anzar Ahmad Khuroo
{"title":"厘清植物共同入侵的影响:相加、拮抗和协同作用","authors":"Showkeen Ahmad Lone, Rameez Ahmed, Bilal Ahmad Rasray, Irfan Rashid, Martin Andres Nuñez, Anzar Ahmad Khuroo","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03411-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the impacts of single-species invasions on resident communities have been widely studied, the ecological effects of co-invasion (simultaneous invasion by multiple alien species) remain largely unexplored. In this study, using an analytical framework, we investigate the individual and combined effects of two global plant invaders (<i>Leucanthemum vulgare</i> and <i>Lupinus polyphyllus</i>) on the aboveground vegetation (plant richness, diversity and biomass) and belowground soil variables (pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, organic carbon [OC], phosphorous, and potassium) of grassland communities in the Himalaya. We studied these ecological variables in comparable plots under the following four scenarios: both invaders absent (i.e. uninvaded), either of the two invaders present (i.e. single species invasion), and both invaders present (i.e., co-invasion). Our results show invasion effects vary with the invasion scenarios and the studied variables. The single species invasion plots had lower mean plant richness and diversity but higher mean soil OC than the uninvaded plots. The co-invasion plots had significantly increased mean plant biomass and soil OC, but had a non-significant effect on plant richness and diversity compared to the uninvaded plots. The overall combined effect of species’ co-invasion was additive in nature, but the effect varied significantly with choice of the response variable. We found synergistic effects of co-invasion on species richness and diversity, antagonistic effects on soil pH, and additive effects on the remaining response variables when compared with the predicted additive effect of the two invaders. Our findings suggest that further spread of <i>L. polyphyllus</i> will impact the resident plant community more severely when co-invading with <i>L. vulgare</i> than when invading alone, thereby lending support to the invasional meltdown hypothesis. Nevertheless, antagonistic and additive impacts for soil pH and other response variables respectively hint towards other alternate mechanisms at play. Overall, our study showcases a proof-of-concept to empirically estimate the additive, antagonistic and synergistic impacts of plant co-invasions, and also provides a model for designing co-invasion studies on other taxa/systems/scales elsewhere. Finally, based on the insights gained from this study, we highlight priority areas of future research in species’ co-invasions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the impacts of plant co-invasions: additive, antagonistic and synergistic\",\"authors\":\"Showkeen Ahmad Lone, Rameez Ahmed, Bilal Ahmad Rasray, Irfan Rashid, Martin Andres Nuñez, Anzar Ahmad Khuroo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10530-024-03411-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the impacts of single-species invasions on resident communities have been widely studied, the ecological effects of co-invasion (simultaneous invasion by multiple alien species) remain largely unexplored. In this study, using an analytical framework, we investigate the individual and combined effects of two global plant invaders (<i>Leucanthemum vulgare</i> and <i>Lupinus polyphyllus</i>) on the aboveground vegetation (plant richness, diversity and biomass) and belowground soil variables (pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, organic carbon [OC], phosphorous, and potassium) of grassland communities in the Himalaya. We studied these ecological variables in comparable plots under the following four scenarios: both invaders absent (i.e. uninvaded), either of the two invaders present (i.e. single species invasion), and both invaders present (i.e., co-invasion). Our results show invasion effects vary with the invasion scenarios and the studied variables. The single species invasion plots had lower mean plant richness and diversity but higher mean soil OC than the uninvaded plots. The co-invasion plots had significantly increased mean plant biomass and soil OC, but had a non-significant effect on plant richness and diversity compared to the uninvaded plots. The overall combined effect of species’ co-invasion was additive in nature, but the effect varied significantly with choice of the response variable. We found synergistic effects of co-invasion on species richness and diversity, antagonistic effects on soil pH, and additive effects on the remaining response variables when compared with the predicted additive effect of the two invaders. Our findings suggest that further spread of <i>L. polyphyllus</i> will impact the resident plant community more severely when co-invading with <i>L. vulgare</i> than when invading alone, thereby lending support to the invasional meltdown hypothesis. Nevertheless, antagonistic and additive impacts for soil pH and other response variables respectively hint towards other alternate mechanisms at play. Overall, our study showcases a proof-of-concept to empirically estimate the additive, antagonistic and synergistic impacts of plant co-invasions, and also provides a model for designing co-invasion studies on other taxa/systems/scales elsewhere. Finally, based on the insights gained from this study, we highlight priority areas of future research in species’ co-invasions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Invasions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03411-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03411-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管单一物种入侵对居民群落的影响已被广泛研究,但共同入侵(多个外来物种同时入侵)的生态效应在很大程度上仍未被探索。在本研究中,我们利用分析框架研究了两种全球植物入侵者(Leucanthemum vulgare 和 Lupinus polyphyllus)对喜马拉雅草地群落地上植被(植物丰富度、多样性和生物量)和地下土壤变量(pH 值、盐度、电导率、溶解性总固体、有机碳、磷和钾)的单独和综合影响。我们在以下四种情况下对可比地块中的这些生态变量进行了研究:两种入侵者都不存在(即未被入侵)、两种入侵者中的任何一种都存在(即单一物种入侵)以及两种入侵者都存在(即共同入侵)。我们的研究结果表明,入侵效应随入侵情况和研究变量的不同而变化。与未受入侵的地块相比,单一物种入侵地块的平均植物丰富度和多样性较低,但平均土壤有机碳含量较高。与未入侵地块相比,共同入侵地块的平均植物生物量和土壤OC显著增加,但对植物丰富度和多样性的影响不显著。物种共同入侵的总体综合效应具有叠加性,但其效应随响应变量的选择而显著不同。与预测的两种入侵者的相加效应相比,我们发现共同入侵对物种丰富度和多样性有协同效应,对土壤酸碱度有拮抗效应,对其余响应变量有相加效应。我们的研究结果表明,多浆藻的进一步扩散将对常驻植物群落造成更严重的影响,与单独入侵相比,与多浆藻共同入侵将对常驻植物群落造成更严重的影响,从而为入侵崩溃假说提供支持。不过,土壤 pH 值和其他响应变量的拮抗和相加影响分别暗示了其他替代机制在起作用。总之,我们的研究展示了一个概念验证,即通过经验估算植物共同入侵的叠加、拮抗和协同影响,同时也为其他地方设计其他类群/系统/规模的共同入侵研究提供了一个模型。最后,基于本研究获得的见解,我们强调了物种共入侵方面未来研究的优先领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disentangling the impacts of plant co-invasions: additive, antagonistic and synergistic

Although the impacts of single-species invasions on resident communities have been widely studied, the ecological effects of co-invasion (simultaneous invasion by multiple alien species) remain largely unexplored. In this study, using an analytical framework, we investigate the individual and combined effects of two global plant invaders (Leucanthemum vulgare and Lupinus polyphyllus) on the aboveground vegetation (plant richness, diversity and biomass) and belowground soil variables (pH, salinity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, organic carbon [OC], phosphorous, and potassium) of grassland communities in the Himalaya. We studied these ecological variables in comparable plots under the following four scenarios: both invaders absent (i.e. uninvaded), either of the two invaders present (i.e. single species invasion), and both invaders present (i.e., co-invasion). Our results show invasion effects vary with the invasion scenarios and the studied variables. The single species invasion plots had lower mean plant richness and diversity but higher mean soil OC than the uninvaded plots. The co-invasion plots had significantly increased mean plant biomass and soil OC, but had a non-significant effect on plant richness and diversity compared to the uninvaded plots. The overall combined effect of species’ co-invasion was additive in nature, but the effect varied significantly with choice of the response variable. We found synergistic effects of co-invasion on species richness and diversity, antagonistic effects on soil pH, and additive effects on the remaining response variables when compared with the predicted additive effect of the two invaders. Our findings suggest that further spread of L. polyphyllus will impact the resident plant community more severely when co-invading with L. vulgare than when invading alone, thereby lending support to the invasional meltdown hypothesis. Nevertheless, antagonistic and additive impacts for soil pH and other response variables respectively hint towards other alternate mechanisms at play. Overall, our study showcases a proof-of-concept to empirically estimate the additive, antagonistic and synergistic impacts of plant co-invasions, and also provides a model for designing co-invasion studies on other taxa/systems/scales elsewhere. Finally, based on the insights gained from this study, we highlight priority areas of future research in species’ co-invasions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Plant invasion down under: exploring the below-ground impact of invasive plant species on soil properties and invertebrate communities in the Central Plateau of New Zealand Cats in a bag: state-based spending for invasive species management across the United States is haphazard, uncoordinated, and incomplete Range expansion of the invasive hybrid cattail Typha × glauca exceeds that of its maternal plant T. angustifolia in the western Prairie Pothole Region of North America Recruitment curves of three non-native conifers in European temperate forests: implications for invasions Combining storm flood water level and topography to prioritize inter-basin transfer of non-native aquatic species in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1