ChatGPT 进入大学:探索学生眼中的人工智能课堂

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1177/00986283241268829
Jenel T. Cavazos, Keane A. Hauck, Hannah M. Baskin, Catherine M. Bain
{"title":"ChatGPT 进入大学:探索学生眼中的人工智能课堂","authors":"Jenel T. Cavazos, Keane A. Hauck, Hannah M. Baskin, Catherine M. Bain","doi":"10.1177/00986283241268829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has sparked numerous discussions about its implications. ChatGPT, a prominent AI conversational model, has attracted significant attention for its ability to generate essays and formulate responses.ObjectiveThe current study sought to explore how and why students are using ChatGPT, and to examine their perceptions about ChatGPT and academic integrity.MethodStudents were surveyed about the frequency and motivation for ChatGPT use and their views on ChatGPT and academic misconduct. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to examine patterns of correlations between each of the measures.ResultsStudents primarily use ChatGPT for gathering information, motivated by its value and convenience rather than hedonic reasons, and can correctly identify academically unethical uses of the tool as cheating.ConclusionThe current study presents comprehensive data on college students’ ChatGPT usage patterns, attitudes, and perceptions of cheating behavior. The outcomes of this research provide insight into how college students are currently interacting with AI tools.Teaching ImplicationsOur findings offer practical insights for universities developing AI policies in the classroom, contributing to the ongoing discourse on AI’s role in higher education by providing accurate information about ChatGPT’s pervasiveness in academia.","PeriodicalId":47708,"journal":{"name":"Teaching of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT Goes to College: Exploring Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom\",\"authors\":\"Jenel T. Cavazos, Keane A. Hauck, Hannah M. Baskin, Catherine M. Bain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00986283241268829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has sparked numerous discussions about its implications. ChatGPT, a prominent AI conversational model, has attracted significant attention for its ability to generate essays and formulate responses.ObjectiveThe current study sought to explore how and why students are using ChatGPT, and to examine their perceptions about ChatGPT and academic integrity.MethodStudents were surveyed about the frequency and motivation for ChatGPT use and their views on ChatGPT and academic misconduct. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to examine patterns of correlations between each of the measures.ResultsStudents primarily use ChatGPT for gathering information, motivated by its value and convenience rather than hedonic reasons, and can correctly identify academically unethical uses of the tool as cheating.ConclusionThe current study presents comprehensive data on college students’ ChatGPT usage patterns, attitudes, and perceptions of cheating behavior. The outcomes of this research provide insight into how college students are currently interacting with AI tools.Teaching ImplicationsOur findings offer practical insights for universities developing AI policies in the classroom, contributing to the ongoing discourse on AI’s role in higher education by providing accurate information about ChatGPT’s pervasiveness in academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241268829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241268829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人工智能(AI)在高等教育中的出现引发了许多关于其影响的讨论。ChatGPT 是一种著名的人工智能会话模型,因其生成文章和拟定回复的能力而备受关注。方法对学生使用 ChatGPT 的频率和动机以及他们对 ChatGPT 和学术不端行为的看法进行了调查。结果学生使用 ChatGPT 的主要目的是收集信息,其动机是 ChatGPT 的价值和便利性,而不是享乐主义的原因,并且能够正确地将学术上不道德使用该工具的行为认定为作弊。教学意义我们的研究结果为大学制定课堂人工智能政策提供了实用的见解,通过提供有关 ChatGPT 在学术界普遍存在的准确信息,为正在进行的有关人工智能在高等教育中的作用的讨论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT Goes to College: Exploring Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom
BackgroundThe emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has sparked numerous discussions about its implications. ChatGPT, a prominent AI conversational model, has attracted significant attention for its ability to generate essays and formulate responses.ObjectiveThe current study sought to explore how and why students are using ChatGPT, and to examine their perceptions about ChatGPT and academic integrity.MethodStudents were surveyed about the frequency and motivation for ChatGPT use and their views on ChatGPT and academic misconduct. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to examine patterns of correlations between each of the measures.ResultsStudents primarily use ChatGPT for gathering information, motivated by its value and convenience rather than hedonic reasons, and can correctly identify academically unethical uses of the tool as cheating.ConclusionThe current study presents comprehensive data on college students’ ChatGPT usage patterns, attitudes, and perceptions of cheating behavior. The outcomes of this research provide insight into how college students are currently interacting with AI tools.Teaching ImplicationsOur findings offer practical insights for universities developing AI policies in the classroom, contributing to the ongoing discourse on AI’s role in higher education by providing accurate information about ChatGPT’s pervasiveness in academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Basic and introductory psychology courses are the most popular electives on college campuses and a rapidly growing addition to high school curriculums. As such, Teaching of Psychology is indispensable as a source book for teaching methods and as a forum for new ideas. Dedicated to improving the learning and teaching process at all educational levels, this journal has established itself as a leading source of information and inspiration for all who teach psychology. Coverage includes empirical research on teaching and learning; studies of teacher or student characteristics; subject matter or content reviews for class use; investigations of student, course, or teacher assessment; professional problems of teachers; essays on teaching.
期刊最新文献
Does Lecture Style Matter in Asynchronous Online Interteaching? Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing The Use of AI Disclosure Statements in Teaching: Developing Skills for Psychologists of the Future Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom Recommendations for Implementing Anti-Ableism Across the Psychology Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1