基于三维边坡稳定性评估的物理信息机器学习解决方案,用于绘制滑坡易发性地图

IF 3.7 2区 材料科学 Q1 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Journal of Central South University Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3
Yun-hao Wang, Lu-qi Wang, Wen-gang Zhang, Song-lin Liu, Wei-xin Sun, Li Hong, Zheng-wei Zhu
{"title":"基于三维边坡稳定性评估的物理信息机器学习解决方案,用于绘制滑坡易发性地图","authors":"Yun-hao Wang, Lu-qi Wang, Wen-gang Zhang, Song-lin Liu, Wei-xin Sun, Li Hong, Zheng-wei Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Landslide susceptibility mapping is a crucial tool for disaster prevention and management. The performance of conventional data-driven model is greatly influenced by the quality of the samples data. The random selection of negative samples results in the lack of interpretability throughout the assessment process. To address this limitation and construct a high-quality negative samples database, this study introduces a physics-informed machine learning approach, combining the random forest model with Scoops 3D, to optimize the negative samples selection strategy and assess the landslide susceptibility of the study area. The Scoops 3D is employed to determine the factor of safety value leveraging Bishop’s simplified method. Instead of conventional random selection, negative samples are extracted from the areas with a high factor of safety value. Subsequently, the results of conventional random forest model and physics-informed data-driven model are analyzed and discussed, focusing on model performance and prediction uncertainty. In comparison to conventional methods, the physics-informed model, set with a safety area threshold of 3, demonstrates a noteworthy improvement in the mean AUC value by 36.7%, coupled with a reduced prediction uncertainty. It is evident that the determination of the safety area threshold exerts an impact on both prediction uncertainty and model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central South University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A physics-informed machine learning solution for landslide susceptibility mapping based on three-dimensional slope stability evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Yun-hao Wang, Lu-qi Wang, Wen-gang Zhang, Song-lin Liu, Wei-xin Sun, Li Hong, Zheng-wei Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Landslide susceptibility mapping is a crucial tool for disaster prevention and management. The performance of conventional data-driven model is greatly influenced by the quality of the samples data. The random selection of negative samples results in the lack of interpretability throughout the assessment process. To address this limitation and construct a high-quality negative samples database, this study introduces a physics-informed machine learning approach, combining the random forest model with Scoops 3D, to optimize the negative samples selection strategy and assess the landslide susceptibility of the study area. The Scoops 3D is employed to determine the factor of safety value leveraging Bishop’s simplified method. Instead of conventional random selection, negative samples are extracted from the areas with a high factor of safety value. Subsequently, the results of conventional random forest model and physics-informed data-driven model are analyzed and discussed, focusing on model performance and prediction uncertainty. In comparison to conventional methods, the physics-informed model, set with a safety area threshold of 3, demonstrates a noteworthy improvement in the mean AUC value by 36.7%, coupled with a reduced prediction uncertainty. It is evident that the determination of the safety area threshold exerts an impact on both prediction uncertainty and model performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central South University\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central South University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central South University","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5687-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡易发性绘图是灾害预防和管理的重要工具。传统数据驱动模型的性能在很大程度上受到样本数据质量的影响。负样本的随机选择导致整个评估过程缺乏可解释性。为解决这一局限性并构建高质量的负样本数据库,本研究引入了一种物理信息机器学习方法,将随机森林模型与 Scoops 3D 相结合,优化负样本选择策略,评估研究区域的滑坡易感性。Scoops 3D 利用 Bishop 简化方法确定安全系数值。从安全系数值较高的区域提取负样本,而不是传统的随机选择。随后,分析和讨论了传统随机森林模型和物理信息数据驱动模型的结果,重点关注模型性能和预测不确定性。与传统方法相比,将安全区域阈值设定为 3 的物理信息模型的平均 AUC 值显著提高了 36.7%,同时还降低了预测的不确定性。可见,安全区域阈值的确定对预测不确定性和模型性能都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A physics-informed machine learning solution for landslide susceptibility mapping based on three-dimensional slope stability evaluation

Landslide susceptibility mapping is a crucial tool for disaster prevention and management. The performance of conventional data-driven model is greatly influenced by the quality of the samples data. The random selection of negative samples results in the lack of interpretability throughout the assessment process. To address this limitation and construct a high-quality negative samples database, this study introduces a physics-informed machine learning approach, combining the random forest model with Scoops 3D, to optimize the negative samples selection strategy and assess the landslide susceptibility of the study area. The Scoops 3D is employed to determine the factor of safety value leveraging Bishop’s simplified method. Instead of conventional random selection, negative samples are extracted from the areas with a high factor of safety value. Subsequently, the results of conventional random forest model and physics-informed data-driven model are analyzed and discussed, focusing on model performance and prediction uncertainty. In comparison to conventional methods, the physics-informed model, set with a safety area threshold of 3, demonstrates a noteworthy improvement in the mean AUC value by 36.7%, coupled with a reduced prediction uncertainty. It is evident that the determination of the safety area threshold exerts an impact on both prediction uncertainty and model performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Central South University
Journal of Central South University METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
242
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Focuses on the latest research achievements in mining and metallurgy Coverage spans across materials science and engineering, metallurgical science and engineering, mineral processing, geology and mining, chemical engineering, and mechanical, electronic and information engineering
期刊最新文献
Multi-dimension and multi-modal rolling mill vibration prediction model based on multi-level network fusion Influence of rare earth element erbium on microstructures and properties of as-cast 8030 aluminum alloy The improvement of large-scale-region landslide susceptibility mapping accuracy by transfer learning Energy evolution model and energy response characteristics of freeze-thaw damaged sandstone under uniaxial compression A hybrid ventilation scheme applied to bi-directional excavation tunnel construction with a long inclined shaft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1