评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者对三联疗法的依从性和持久性:一项德国索赔数据研究

Claus F Vogelmeier, Kai-Michael Beeh, Michael Schultze, Nils Kossack, Lena M Richter, Jing Claussen, Chris Compton, Stephen G Noorduyn, Afisi S Ismaila, Gema Requena
{"title":"评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者对三联疗法的依从性和持久性:一项德国索赔数据研究","authors":"Claus F Vogelmeier, Kai-Michael Beeh, Michael Schultze, Nils Kossack, Lena M Richter, Jing Claussen, Chris Compton, Stephen G Noorduyn, Afisi S Ismaila, Gema Requena","doi":"10.2147/copd.s460903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017–June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥ 35 years with 1 year’s continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of &gt; 30 days used to define non-persistence.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> comparative, multiple- or single-inhaler triple therapy, new-user, proportion of days covered, real-world analysis, treatment discontinuation<br/>","PeriodicalId":13792,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence to Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: A German Claims Data Study\",\"authors\":\"Claus F Vogelmeier, Kai-Michael Beeh, Michael Schultze, Nils Kossack, Lena M Richter, Jing Claussen, Chris Compton, Stephen G Noorduyn, Afisi S Ismaila, Gema Requena\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/copd.s460903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017–June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥ 35 years with 1 year’s continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of &gt; 30 days used to define non-persistence.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> comparative, multiple- or single-inhaler triple therapy, new-user, proportion of days covered, real-world analysis, treatment discontinuation<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s460903\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s460903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:三联疗法(长效毒蕈碱类拮抗剂/长效β2-受体激动剂/口服皮质类固醇)被推荐用于反复发作的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者。多吸入器三联疗法(MITT)的依从性和持续性较差。本研究评估了德国实际环境中慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者对单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)与多吸入器三联疗法的依从性和持续性的比较:这项回顾性分析使用 WIG2 基准数据库确定了 2017 年 11 月至 2019 年 6 月新开始使用 MITT 或 SITT(糠酸氟替卡松/优甲乐/维兰特罗 [FF/UMEC/VI] 或福莫特罗/倍氯米松/溴化甘草酸铵 [FOR/BDP/GLY])三联疗法的 COPD 患者。符合条件的患者年龄≥35岁,在开始接受三联疗法前连续投保1年,且既往无三联疗法记录。采用治疗反概率加权法平衡基线特征。在开始治疗后的 6、12 和 18 个月,用覆盖天数比例(PDC)来衡量依从性;在 6、12 和 18 个月,衡量持续性(直至停止治疗的时间),用 30 天的间隙来定义非持续性:在纳入分析的 5710 名患者(平均年龄 66 岁)中,71.4% 开始接受 MITT 治疗,28.6% 开始接受 SITT 治疗(FF/UMEC/VI:41.4%;FOR/BDP/GLY:58.6%)。在所有时间点,SITT 用户的平均 PDC 均高于 MITT 用户;在每个时间点,FF/UMEC/VI 用户的平均 PDC 均最高。在开始治疗后的前 6 个月,FF/UMEC/VI(29%)和 FOR/BDP/GLY(19%)使用者的依从性高于 MITT 使用者。在整个观察期内,FF/UMEC/VI 使用者中坚持治疗的患者比例最高;18 个月时,16.5% 的 FF/UMEC/VI 使用者坚持治疗,而 MITT 使用者的坚持率为 2.3%:结论:在德国,开始接受 SITT 治疗的患者与开始接受 MITT 治疗的患者相比,在开始治疗后的 6 至 18 个月内,依从性和持续性明显更高。在SITT中,FF/UMEC/VI使用者的依从性和持续性比例最高。关键词:比较、多种或单一吸入器三联疗法、新使用者、覆盖天数比例、真实世界分析、治疗中断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence to Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: A German Claims Data Study
Purpose: Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017–June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥ 35 years with 1 year’s continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of > 30 days used to define non-persistence.
Results: Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users.
Conclusion: Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence.

Keywords: comparative, multiple- or single-inhaler triple therapy, new-user, proportion of days covered, real-world analysis, treatment discontinuation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD A Network Meta-Analysis of Aerobic, Resistance, Endurance, and High-Intensity Interval Training to Prioritize Exercise for Stable COPD Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure and in-Hospital Mortality Among Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study The Relationship Between Benefit Finding and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Mediating Effects of Self-Management Exploring Gender Differences in the Association Between TyG Index and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study from NHANES 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1