基于年龄的刻板印象威胁对健康老年人动态平衡的影响

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158
Liliane Borel, Béatrice Alescio-Lautier, Jacques Léonard, Isabelle Régner
{"title":"基于年龄的刻板印象威胁对健康老年人动态平衡的影响","authors":"Liliane Borel, Béatrice Alescio-Lautier, Jacques Léonard, Isabelle Régner","doi":"10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionStereotype threat can lead older adults to perceive their experiences in a biased manner, giving rise to interfering thoughts and negative emotions that generate stress and anxiety. Negative beliefs about aging may serve as an additional factor that increases the need for attentional demand, potentially resulting in a performance level below their actual capabilities. In the present study, we asked whether negative aging stereotypes influence a dynamic balance task and explored the means to counteract them in healthy elderly participants.MethodsThe performance of balance was compared in two groups of participants aged 65 to 75 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 22) under stereotype threat or reduced-threat situation. Balance abilities were tested under dynamic conditions, requiring participants to maintain balance on a moving platform and using a gradient of difficulty (with eyes open or closed, without or with foam). Postural performance was evaluated by means of posturographic evaluation of the center of pressure displacement and motion analysis. Additionally, we investigated the effects of stereotype threat on a preferred walking speed task and on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.ResultsParticipants under stereotype threat showed poorer balance, particularly in challenging conditions (eyes closed, on foam), with less effective body segments stabilization. Their postural stabilization on foam was worse compared to a solid surface. Conversely, those in the reduced threat condition maintained better body segment stabilization across all conditions, indicating consistent postural control regardless of the presence of foam. Stereotype threat did not affect preferred walking speed or the time to complete the “Time Up and Go” test.Discussion-conclusionThis study provides the first description of age-based stereotype threat effects on a dynamic balance task and how to counteract them in healthy older adults. We suggest that the decrease in postural performance observed in participants exposed to stereotype threat can be attributed to a split in attentional focus between negative intrusive thoughts and the attention needed for maintaining balance. These findings open new perspectives on how to overcome negative expectations when evaluating and training physical abilities, thereby contributing to fall prevention among older adults.","PeriodicalId":12649,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-based stereotype threat effects on dynamic balance in healthy older adults\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Borel, Béatrice Alescio-Lautier, Jacques Léonard, Isabelle Régner\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionStereotype threat can lead older adults to perceive their experiences in a biased manner, giving rise to interfering thoughts and negative emotions that generate stress and anxiety. Negative beliefs about aging may serve as an additional factor that increases the need for attentional demand, potentially resulting in a performance level below their actual capabilities. In the present study, we asked whether negative aging stereotypes influence a dynamic balance task and explored the means to counteract them in healthy elderly participants.MethodsThe performance of balance was compared in two groups of participants aged 65 to 75 years (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 22) under stereotype threat or reduced-threat situation. Balance abilities were tested under dynamic conditions, requiring participants to maintain balance on a moving platform and using a gradient of difficulty (with eyes open or closed, without or with foam). Postural performance was evaluated by means of posturographic evaluation of the center of pressure displacement and motion analysis. Additionally, we investigated the effects of stereotype threat on a preferred walking speed task and on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.ResultsParticipants under stereotype threat showed poorer balance, particularly in challenging conditions (eyes closed, on foam), with less effective body segments stabilization. Their postural stabilization on foam was worse compared to a solid surface. Conversely, those in the reduced threat condition maintained better body segment stabilization across all conditions, indicating consistent postural control regardless of the presence of foam. Stereotype threat did not affect preferred walking speed or the time to complete the “Time Up and Go” test.Discussion-conclusionThis study provides the first description of age-based stereotype threat effects on a dynamic balance task and how to counteract them in healthy older adults. We suggest that the decrease in postural performance observed in participants exposed to stereotype threat can be attributed to a split in attentional focus between negative intrusive thoughts and the attention needed for maintaining balance. These findings open new perspectives on how to overcome negative expectations when evaluating and training physical abilities, thereby contributing to fall prevention among older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2024.1309158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:陈规定型威胁会导致老年人以一种有偏见的方式看待自己的经历,从而产生干扰思想和负面情绪,造成压力和焦虑。关于老龄化的负面信念可能会成为增加注意力需求的额外因素,从而可能导致表现水平低于实际能力。在本研究中,我们询问了消极的老龄化刻板印象是否会影响动态平衡任务,并探索了在健康的老年参与者中抵消消极刻板印象的方法。方法:比较了两组年龄在 65 至 75 岁之间的参与者(22 人)在刻板印象威胁或减少威胁情况下的平衡表现。平衡能力测试是在动态条件下进行的,要求参与者在移动平台上保持平衡,并使用难度梯度(睁眼或闭眼,无泡沫或有泡沫)。通过对压力中心位移和运动分析的体位图评估,对参与者的姿势表现进行了评估。此外,我们还研究了刻板印象威胁对首选步行速度任务和定时上下(TUG)测试的影响。结果受到刻板印象威胁的参与者平衡能力较差,尤其是在具有挑战性的条件下(闭眼,在泡沫上),身体各部分的稳定效果较差。与固体表面相比,他们在泡沫上的姿势稳定性更差。相反,在减少威胁的条件下,受试者在所有条件下都能保持较好的体节稳定,这表明无论泡沫是否存在,受试者的姿势控制能力都是一致的。该研究首次描述了基于年龄的刻板印象威胁对动态平衡任务的影响,以及如何在健康的老年人中消除这种影响。我们认为,在受到刻板印象威胁的参与者身上观察到的姿势表现下降可归因于注意力在消极的侵入性想法和保持平衡所需的注意力之间的分裂。这些发现为我们在评估和训练体能时如何克服消极期望开辟了新的视角,从而有助于预防老年人跌倒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Age-based stereotype threat effects on dynamic balance in healthy older adults
IntroductionStereotype threat can lead older adults to perceive their experiences in a biased manner, giving rise to interfering thoughts and negative emotions that generate stress and anxiety. Negative beliefs about aging may serve as an additional factor that increases the need for attentional demand, potentially resulting in a performance level below their actual capabilities. In the present study, we asked whether negative aging stereotypes influence a dynamic balance task and explored the means to counteract them in healthy elderly participants.MethodsThe performance of balance was compared in two groups of participants aged 65 to 75 years (n = 22) under stereotype threat or reduced-threat situation. Balance abilities were tested under dynamic conditions, requiring participants to maintain balance on a moving platform and using a gradient of difficulty (with eyes open or closed, without or with foam). Postural performance was evaluated by means of posturographic evaluation of the center of pressure displacement and motion analysis. Additionally, we investigated the effects of stereotype threat on a preferred walking speed task and on the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.ResultsParticipants under stereotype threat showed poorer balance, particularly in challenging conditions (eyes closed, on foam), with less effective body segments stabilization. Their postural stabilization on foam was worse compared to a solid surface. Conversely, those in the reduced threat condition maintained better body segment stabilization across all conditions, indicating consistent postural control regardless of the presence of foam. Stereotype threat did not affect preferred walking speed or the time to complete the “Time Up and Go” test.Discussion-conclusionThis study provides the first description of age-based stereotype threat effects on a dynamic balance task and how to counteract them in healthy older adults. We suggest that the decrease in postural performance observed in participants exposed to stereotype threat can be attributed to a split in attentional focus between negative intrusive thoughts and the attention needed for maintaining balance. These findings open new perspectives on how to overcome negative expectations when evaluating and training physical abilities, thereby contributing to fall prevention among older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Neuroscience-Developmental Neuroscience
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
144
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of whole systems of the brain, including those involved in sensation, movement, learning and memory, attention, reward, decision-making, reasoning, executive functions, and emotions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: The cerebellum and fear extinction: evidence from rodent and human studies. Asymmetry and rehabilitation of the subjective visual vertical in unilateral vestibular hypofunction patients Brain-consistent architecture for imagination. Corrigendum: Neurocognitive and cerebellar function in ADHD, autism and spinocerebellar ataxia. Occlusal effects on text reading: an eye-tracker study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1