可信的联合学习:全面回顾、架构、主要挑战和未来研究展望

IF 6.3 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3438264
Asadullah Tariq;Mohamed Adel Serhani;Farag M. Sallabi;Ezedin S. Barka;Tariq Qayyum;Heba M. Khater;Khaled A. Shuaib
{"title":"可信的联合学习:全面回顾、架构、主要挑战和未来研究展望","authors":"Asadullah Tariq;Mohamed Adel Serhani;Farag M. Sallabi;Ezedin S. Barka;Tariq Qayyum;Heba M. Khater;Khaled A. Shuaib","doi":"10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3438264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling collaborative model training across distributed devices while maintaining data privacy. As the importance of FL and its application in various areas increased, addressing trustworthiness issues in its various aspects became crucial. In this survey, we provided a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art research on Trustworthy FL, exploring existing solutions and key foundations relevant to Trustworthiness in FL. There has been significant growth in the literature on trustworthy centralized Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). However, there is still a need for more focused efforts toward identifying trustworthiness pillars and evaluation metrics in FL. In this paper, we proposed a taxonomy encompassing five main classifications for Trustworthy FL, including Interpretability and Explainability, Transparency, Privacy and Robustness, Fairness, and Accountability. Each category represents a dimension of trust and is further broken down into different sub-categories. Moreover, we addressed trustworthiness in a Decentralized FL (DFL) setting. Communication efficiency is essential for ensuring Trustworthy FL. This paper also highlights the significance of communication efficiency within various Trustworthy FL pillars and investigates existing research on communication-efficient techniques across these pillars. Our survey comprehensively addresses trustworthiness challenges across all aspects within the Trustworthy FL settings. We also proposed a comprehensive architecture for Trustworthy FL, detailing the fundamental principles underlying the concept, and provided an in-depth analysis of trust assessment mechanisms. In conclusion, we identified key research challenges related to every aspect of Trustworthy FL and suggested future research directions. This comprehensive survey served as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on the development and implementation of Trustworthy FL systems, contributing to a more secure and reliable AI landscape.","PeriodicalId":33803,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10623386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trustworthy Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Review, Architecture, Key Challenges, and Future Research Prospects\",\"authors\":\"Asadullah Tariq;Mohamed Adel Serhani;Farag M. Sallabi;Ezedin S. Barka;Tariq Qayyum;Heba M. Khater;Khaled A. Shuaib\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3438264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling collaborative model training across distributed devices while maintaining data privacy. As the importance of FL and its application in various areas increased, addressing trustworthiness issues in its various aspects became crucial. In this survey, we provided a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art research on Trustworthy FL, exploring existing solutions and key foundations relevant to Trustworthiness in FL. There has been significant growth in the literature on trustworthy centralized Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). However, there is still a need for more focused efforts toward identifying trustworthiness pillars and evaluation metrics in FL. In this paper, we proposed a taxonomy encompassing five main classifications for Trustworthy FL, including Interpretability and Explainability, Transparency, Privacy and Robustness, Fairness, and Accountability. Each category represents a dimension of trust and is further broken down into different sub-categories. Moreover, we addressed trustworthiness in a Decentralized FL (DFL) setting. Communication efficiency is essential for ensuring Trustworthy FL. This paper also highlights the significance of communication efficiency within various Trustworthy FL pillars and investigates existing research on communication-efficient techniques across these pillars. Our survey comprehensively addresses trustworthiness challenges across all aspects within the Trustworthy FL settings. We also proposed a comprehensive architecture for Trustworthy FL, detailing the fundamental principles underlying the concept, and provided an in-depth analysis of trust assessment mechanisms. In conclusion, we identified key research challenges related to every aspect of Trustworthy FL and suggested future research directions. This comprehensive survey served as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on the development and implementation of Trustworthy FL systems, contributing to a more secure and reliable AI landscape.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10623386\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10623386/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10623386/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联合学习(FL)是人工智能(AI)领域的一项重大进步,它可以在维护数据隐私的同时,实现跨分布式设备的协作模型训练。随着联邦学习的重要性及其在各个领域的应用不断增加,解决其各方面的可信性问题变得至关重要。在本调查中,我们全面概述了有关可信 FL 的最新研究成果,探讨了与 FL 可信性相关的现有解决方案和关键基础。关于值得信赖的集中式机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)的文献有了长足的发展。然而,在确定 FL 中的可信性支柱和评估指标方面,仍然需要更加专注的努力。在本文中,我们为值得信赖的 FL 提出了一个包含五大分类的分类标准,包括可解释性和可说明性、透明度、隐私性和稳健性、公平性和问责制。每个类别代表一个信任维度,并进一步细分为不同的子类别。此外,我们还探讨了分散式 FL(DFL)环境下的可信度问题。通信效率对于确保值得信赖的 FL 至关重要。本文还强调了通信效率在各种值得信赖的 FL 支柱中的重要性,并调查了有关这些支柱的通信效率技术的现有研究。我们的调查全面解决了可信 FL 环境中各方面的可信性挑战。我们还提出了值得信赖的 FL 的综合架构,详细阐述了这一概念的基本原则,并对信任评估机制进行了深入分析。最后,我们确定了与值得信赖的 FL 的各个方面相关的关键研究挑战,并提出了未来的研究方向。这份全面的调查报告为致力于开发和实施可信 FL 系统的研究人员和从业人员提供了宝贵的资源,有助于建立一个更加安全可靠的人工智能环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trustworthy Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Review, Architecture, Key Challenges, and Future Research Prospects
Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabling collaborative model training across distributed devices while maintaining data privacy. As the importance of FL and its application in various areas increased, addressing trustworthiness issues in its various aspects became crucial. In this survey, we provided a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art research on Trustworthy FL, exploring existing solutions and key foundations relevant to Trustworthiness in FL. There has been significant growth in the literature on trustworthy centralized Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). However, there is still a need for more focused efforts toward identifying trustworthiness pillars and evaluation metrics in FL. In this paper, we proposed a taxonomy encompassing five main classifications for Trustworthy FL, including Interpretability and Explainability, Transparency, Privacy and Robustness, Fairness, and Accountability. Each category represents a dimension of trust and is further broken down into different sub-categories. Moreover, we addressed trustworthiness in a Decentralized FL (DFL) setting. Communication efficiency is essential for ensuring Trustworthy FL. This paper also highlights the significance of communication efficiency within various Trustworthy FL pillars and investigates existing research on communication-efficient techniques across these pillars. Our survey comprehensively addresses trustworthiness challenges across all aspects within the Trustworthy FL settings. We also proposed a comprehensive architecture for Trustworthy FL, detailing the fundamental principles underlying the concept, and provided an in-depth analysis of trust assessment mechanisms. In conclusion, we identified key research challenges related to every aspect of Trustworthy FL and suggested future research directions. This comprehensive survey served as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on the development and implementation of Trustworthy FL systems, contributing to a more secure and reliable AI landscape.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
94
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society (OJ-COMS) is an open access, all-electronic journal that publishes original high-quality manuscripts on advances in the state of the art of telecommunications systems and networks. The papers in IEEE OJ-COMS are included in Scopus. Submissions reporting new theoretical findings (including novel methods, concepts, and studies) and practical contributions (including experiments and development of prototypes) are welcome. Additionally, survey and tutorial articles are considered. The IEEE OJCOMS received its debut impact factor of 7.9 according to the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2023. The IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society covers science, technology, applications and standards for information organization, collection and transfer using electronic, optical and wireless channels and networks. Some specific areas covered include: Systems and network architecture, control and management Protocols, software, and middleware Quality of service, reliability, and security Modulation, detection, coding, and signaling Switching and routing Mobile and portable communications Terminals and other end-user devices Networks for content distribution and distributed computing Communications-based distributed resources control.
期刊最新文献
GP-DGECN: Geometric Prior Dynamic Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks for Specific Emitter Identification A Tractable Framework for Spectrum Coexistence Between Satellite Receivers and Terrestrial Networks A Survey of LoRaWAN-Integrated Wearable Sensor Networks for Human Activity Recognition: Applications, Challenges and Possible Solutions Detection of Zero-Day Attacks in a Software-Defined LEO Constellation Network Using Enhanced Network Metric Predictions Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Network Intrusion Detection Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1