重新定义问责制:驾驭分权自治组织中参与者责任的法律挑战

Aneta Napieralska, Przemysław Kępczyński
{"title":"重新定义问责制:驾驭分权自治组织中参与者责任的法律挑战","authors":"Aneta Napieralska, Przemysław Kępczyński","doi":"arxiv-2408.04717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are\nrevolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous\nOrganizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance.\nHowever, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks,\nespecially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on\nanalyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a\nparticular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such\nconsiderations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might\nbe adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized\ngovernance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique\nissues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the\nanonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts\ncomplicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO\ncontext and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional\norganizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify\npotential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how\nexisting regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable\nin the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining Accountability: Navigating Legal Challenges of Participant Liability in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations\",\"authors\":\"Aneta Napieralska, Przemysław Kępczyński\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.04717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are\\nrevolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous\\nOrganizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance.\\nHowever, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks,\\nespecially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on\\nanalyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a\\nparticular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such\\nconsiderations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might\\nbe adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized\\ngovernance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique\\nissues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the\\nanonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts\\ncomplicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO\\ncontext and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional\\norganizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify\\npotential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how\\nexisting regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable\\nin the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在数字时代,区块链等创新技术正在彻底改变传统的组织范式,去中心化自治组织(DAOs)作为前卫的集体治理模式应运而生。然而,其独特的结构对现有的法律框架提出了挑战,尤其是在参与者的责任方面。本研究的重点是分析 DAO 去中心化性质的法律影响,特别强调参与者责任方面。这些考虑对于理解如何调整或改革现行法律制度以有效应对这些新挑战至关重要。本文研究了 DAO 的特殊性,强调了其去中心化治理结构和对智能合约的依赖,这带来了与责任边界模糊有关的独特问题。它强调了 DAO 参与者的匿名性和智能合约的自动执行如何在 DAO 范畴内以及在与外部各方的互动中使传统的法律责任概念复杂化。分析还包括对 DAO 和传统组织形式(如公司和协会)进行比较,以确定参与者责任方面的潜在类比和差异。它探讨了现有的合伙人责任法规如何可能在 DAO 环境中不充分或不适用,从而促使人们寻找新的、创新的法律解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redefining Accountability: Navigating Legal Challenges of Participant Liability in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are revolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance. However, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks, especially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on analyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a particular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such considerations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might be adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized governance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique issues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the anonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts complicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO context and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional organizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify potential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how existing regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable in the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It depends: Varieties of defining growth dependence Experimental Evidence That Conversational Artificial Intelligence Can Steer Consumer Behavior Without Detection Cognitive Hierarchy in Day-to-day Network Flow Dynamics The long-term human capital and health impacts of a pollution reduction programme What Does ChatGPT Make of Historical Stock Returns? Extrapolation and Miscalibration in LLM Stock Return Forecasts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1