{"title":"重新定义问责制:驾驭分权自治组织中参与者责任的法律挑战","authors":"Aneta Napieralska, Przemysław Kępczyński","doi":"arxiv-2408.04717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are\nrevolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous\nOrganizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance.\nHowever, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks,\nespecially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on\nanalyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a\nparticular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such\nconsiderations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might\nbe adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized\ngovernance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique\nissues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the\nanonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts\ncomplicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO\ncontext and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional\norganizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify\npotential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how\nexisting regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable\nin the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.","PeriodicalId":501273,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining Accountability: Navigating Legal Challenges of Participant Liability in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations\",\"authors\":\"Aneta Napieralska, Przemysław Kępczyński\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.04717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are\\nrevolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous\\nOrganizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance.\\nHowever, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks,\\nespecially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on\\nanalyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a\\nparticular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such\\nconsiderations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might\\nbe adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized\\ngovernance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique\\nissues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the\\nanonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts\\ncomplicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO\\ncontext and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional\\norganizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify\\npotential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how\\nexisting regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable\\nin the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - General Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - General Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在数字时代,区块链等创新技术正在彻底改变传统的组织范式,去中心化自治组织(DAOs)作为前卫的集体治理模式应运而生。然而,其独特的结构对现有的法律框架提出了挑战,尤其是在参与者的责任方面。本研究的重点是分析 DAO 去中心化性质的法律影响,特别强调参与者责任方面。这些考虑对于理解如何调整或改革现行法律制度以有效应对这些新挑战至关重要。本文研究了 DAO 的特殊性,强调了其去中心化治理结构和对智能合约的依赖,这带来了与责任边界模糊有关的独特问题。它强调了 DAO 参与者的匿名性和智能合约的自动执行如何在 DAO 范畴内以及在与外部各方的互动中使传统的法律责任概念复杂化。分析还包括对 DAO 和传统组织形式(如公司和协会)进行比较,以确定参与者责任方面的潜在类比和差异。它探讨了现有的合伙人责任法规如何可能在 DAO 环境中不充分或不适用,从而促使人们寻找新的、创新的法律解决方案。
Redefining Accountability: Navigating Legal Challenges of Participant Liability in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations
In the digital era, where innovative technologies like blockchain are
revolutionizing traditional organizational paradigms, Decentralized Autonomous
Organizations (DAOs) emerge as avant-garde models of collective governance.
However, their unique structure challenges existing legal frameworks,
especially concerning the liability of participants. This study focuses on
analyzing the legal implications of the decentralized nature of DAOs, with a
particular emphasis on the aspects of participant liability. Such
considerations are essential for understanding how current legal systems might
be adapted or reformed to effectively address these novel challenges. The paper examines the specificity of DAOs, highlighting their decentralized
governance structure and reliance on smart contracts, which introduce unique
issues related to the blurring of liability boundaries. It underscores how the
anonymity of DAO participants and the automatic execution of smart contracts
complicate the traditional concept of legal liability, both within the DAO
context and in interactions with external parties. The analysis also includes a comparison between DAOs and traditional
organizational forms, such as corporations and associations, to identify
potential analogies and differences in participant liability. It explores how
existing regulations on partner liability might be insufficient or inapplicable
in the DAO context, prompting the search for new, innovative legal solutions.