公交出行期间极端气温累积暴露评估框架

Huiying Fan, Hongyu Lu, Geyu Lyu, Angshuman Guin, Randall Guensler
{"title":"公交出行期间极端气温累积暴露评估框架","authors":"Huiying Fan, Hongyu Lu, Geyu Lyu, Angshuman Guin, Randall Guensler","doi":"arxiv-2408.04081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The combined influence of urban heat islands, climate change, and extreme\ntemperature events are increasingly impacting transit travelers, especially\nvulnerable populations such as older adults, people with disabilities, and\nthose with chronic diseases. Previous studies have generally attempted to\naddress this issue at either the micro- or macro-level, but each approach\npresents different limitations in modeling the impacts on transit trips. Other\nresearch proposes a meso-level approach to address some of these gaps, but the\nuse of additive exposure calculation and spatial shortest path routing poses\nconstraints meso-modeling accuracy. This study introduces HeatPath Analyzer, a\nframework to assess the exposure of transit riders to extreme temperatures,\nusing TransitSim 4.0 to generate second-by-second spatio-temporal trip\ntrajectories, the traveler activity profiles, and thermal comfort levels along\nthe entire journey. The approach uses heat stress combines the standards\nproposed by the NWS and CDC to estimate cumulative exposure for transit riders,\nwith specific parameters tailored to the elderly and people with disabilities.\nThe framework assesses the influence of extreme heat and winter chill. A case\nstudy in Atlanta, GA, reveals that 10.2% of trips on an average summer weekday\nin 2019 were at risk of extreme heat. The results uncover exposure disparities\nacross different transit trip mode segments, and across mitigation-based and\nadaptation-based strategies. While the mitigation-based strategy highlights\nhigh-exposure segments such as long ingress and egress, adaptation should be\nprioritized toward the middle or second half of the trip when a traveler is\nwaiting for transit or transferring between routes. A comparison between the\ntraditional additive approach and the dynamic approach presented also shows\nsignificant disparities, which, if overlooked, can mislead policy decisions.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Assessing Cumulative Exposure to Extreme Temperatures During Transit Trip\",\"authors\":\"Huiying Fan, Hongyu Lu, Geyu Lyu, Angshuman Guin, Randall Guensler\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.04081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The combined influence of urban heat islands, climate change, and extreme\\ntemperature events are increasingly impacting transit travelers, especially\\nvulnerable populations such as older adults, people with disabilities, and\\nthose with chronic diseases. Previous studies have generally attempted to\\naddress this issue at either the micro- or macro-level, but each approach\\npresents different limitations in modeling the impacts on transit trips. Other\\nresearch proposes a meso-level approach to address some of these gaps, but the\\nuse of additive exposure calculation and spatial shortest path routing poses\\nconstraints meso-modeling accuracy. This study introduces HeatPath Analyzer, a\\nframework to assess the exposure of transit riders to extreme temperatures,\\nusing TransitSim 4.0 to generate second-by-second spatio-temporal trip\\ntrajectories, the traveler activity profiles, and thermal comfort levels along\\nthe entire journey. The approach uses heat stress combines the standards\\nproposed by the NWS and CDC to estimate cumulative exposure for transit riders,\\nwith specific parameters tailored to the elderly and people with disabilities.\\nThe framework assesses the influence of extreme heat and winter chill. A case\\nstudy in Atlanta, GA, reveals that 10.2% of trips on an average summer weekday\\nin 2019 were at risk of extreme heat. The results uncover exposure disparities\\nacross different transit trip mode segments, and across mitigation-based and\\nadaptation-based strategies. While the mitigation-based strategy highlights\\nhigh-exposure segments such as long ingress and egress, adaptation should be\\nprioritized toward the middle or second half of the trip when a traveler is\\nwaiting for transit or transferring between routes. A comparison between the\\ntraditional additive approach and the dynamic approach presented also shows\\nsignificant disparities, which, if overlooked, can mislead policy decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.04081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市热岛、气候变化和极端温度事件的综合影响对公交乘客的影响越来越大,尤其是老年人、残疾人和慢性病患者等弱势群体。以往的研究通常试图从微观或宏观层面解决这一问题,但在模拟对公交出行的影响时,每种方法都有不同的局限性。其他研究提出了中观层面的方法来解决其中的一些不足,但使用加法暴露计算和空间最短路径路由对中观建模的准确性构成了限制。本研究介绍了热路径分析器(HeatPath Analyzer),这是一个评估公交乘客暴露于极端温度的框架,它使用 TransitSim 4.0 生成逐秒的时空三轨迹、乘客活动轮廓以及整个旅程的热舒适度。该方法结合美国国家气象局(NWS)和美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)提出的热应激标准来估算公交乘客的累积暴露量,并为老年人和残疾人量身定制了特定参数。在佐治亚州亚特兰大市进行的一项案例研究显示,2019 年夏季工作日平均有 10.2% 的行程面临酷热风险。研究结果揭示了不同公交出行方式、基于缓解的战略和基于适应的战略之间的暴露差异。基于减缓的策略强调高暴露段,如长出入口,而基于适应的策略则应优先考虑行程的中段或后半段,此时乘客正在等待公交或在不同路线之间换乘。传统的加法方法与本文介绍的动态方法之间的比较也显示出明显的差异,如果忽视这些差异,可能会误导政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Framework for Assessing Cumulative Exposure to Extreme Temperatures During Transit Trip
The combined influence of urban heat islands, climate change, and extreme temperature events are increasingly impacting transit travelers, especially vulnerable populations such as older adults, people with disabilities, and those with chronic diseases. Previous studies have generally attempted to address this issue at either the micro- or macro-level, but each approach presents different limitations in modeling the impacts on transit trips. Other research proposes a meso-level approach to address some of these gaps, but the use of additive exposure calculation and spatial shortest path routing poses constraints meso-modeling accuracy. This study introduces HeatPath Analyzer, a framework to assess the exposure of transit riders to extreme temperatures, using TransitSim 4.0 to generate second-by-second spatio-temporal trip trajectories, the traveler activity profiles, and thermal comfort levels along the entire journey. The approach uses heat stress combines the standards proposed by the NWS and CDC to estimate cumulative exposure for transit riders, with specific parameters tailored to the elderly and people with disabilities. The framework assesses the influence of extreme heat and winter chill. A case study in Atlanta, GA, reveals that 10.2% of trips on an average summer weekday in 2019 were at risk of extreme heat. The results uncover exposure disparities across different transit trip mode segments, and across mitigation-based and adaptation-based strategies. While the mitigation-based strategy highlights high-exposure segments such as long ingress and egress, adaptation should be prioritized toward the middle or second half of the trip when a traveler is waiting for transit or transferring between routes. A comparison between the traditional additive approach and the dynamic approach presented also shows significant disparities, which, if overlooked, can mislead policy decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian framework to evaluate evidence in cases of alleged cheating with secret codes in sports Unsupervised anomaly detection in spatio-temporal stream network sensor data A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education. A model of analysis Monitoring road infrastructures from satellite images in Greater Maputo: an object-oriented classification approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1