Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education. A model of analysis

Maria-Eugenia Cardenal, Octavio-David Diaz-Santana, Sara-Maria Gonzalez-Betancor
{"title":"Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education. A model of analysis","authors":"Maria-Eugenia Cardenal, Octavio-David Diaz-Santana, Sara-Maria Gonzalez-Betancor","doi":"arxiv-2409.06562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The teacher role in the classroom can explain important aspects of\nthe student's school experience. The teacher-student relationship, a central\ndimension of social capital, influences students' engagement, and the teaching\nstyle plays an important role in student outcomes. But there is scarce\nliterature that links teaching styles to teacher-student relationship. This\narticle aims to: 1) analyze whether there is a relationship between teaching\nstyles and the type of relationship perceived by students; 2) test whether this\nrelationship is equally strong for any teaching style; and 3) determine the\nextent to which students' perceptions vary according to their profile.\nDesign/methodology/approach: A structural equation model with four latent\nvariables is estimated: two for the teacher-student relationship (emotional vs.\neducational) and two for the teaching styles (directive vs. participative),\nwith information for 21126 sixth-grade primary-students in 2019 in Spain.\nFindings: Teacher-student relationships and teaching styles are interconnected.\nThe participative style implies a better relationship. The perceptions of the\nteacher are heterogeneous, depending on gender (girls perceive clearer than\nboys) and with the educational background (children from lower educational\nbackground perceive both types of teaching styles more clearly).\nOriginality/value: The analysis is based on the point of view of the addressee\nof the teacher's work, i.e. the student. It provides a model that can be\nreplicated in any other education system. The latent variables, based on a\nperiodically administered questionnaire, could be estimated with data from\ndiagnostic assessments in other countries, which in turn would allow the\nformulation of context-specific educational policy proposals that take into\naccount student feedback.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The teacher role in the classroom can explain important aspects of the student's school experience. The teacher-student relationship, a central dimension of social capital, influences students' engagement, and the teaching style plays an important role in student outcomes. But there is scarce literature that links teaching styles to teacher-student relationship. This article aims to: 1) analyze whether there is a relationship between teaching styles and the type of relationship perceived by students; 2) test whether this relationship is equally strong for any teaching style; and 3) determine the extent to which students' perceptions vary according to their profile. Design/methodology/approach: A structural equation model with four latent variables is estimated: two for the teacher-student relationship (emotional vs. educational) and two for the teaching styles (directive vs. participative), with information for 21126 sixth-grade primary-students in 2019 in Spain. Findings: Teacher-student relationships and teaching styles are interconnected. The participative style implies a better relationship. The perceptions of the teacher are heterogeneous, depending on gender (girls perceive clearer than boys) and with the educational background (children from lower educational background perceive both types of teaching styles more clearly). Originality/value: The analysis is based on the point of view of the addressee of the teacher's work, i.e. the student. It provides a model that can be replicated in any other education system. The latent variables, based on a periodically administered questionnaire, could be estimated with data from diagnostic assessments in other countries, which in turn would allow the formulation of context-specific educational policy proposals that take into account student feedback.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学教育中的师生关系和教学风格。分析模型
目的:教师在课堂上的角色可以解释学生在校经历的重要方面。师生关系是社会资本的一个核心维度,它影响着学生的参与度,而教学风格则对学生的学习成绩起着重要作用。但是,将教学风格与师生关系联系起来的文献很少。本文旨在1)分析教学风格与学生感知的师生关系类型之间是否存在关系;2)检验这种关系是否对任何教学风格都同样强烈;3)确定学生的感知因其个人情况而异的程度:利用2019年西班牙21126名六年级小学生的信息,估算了一个包含四个潜在变量的结构方程模型:两个是师生关系变量(情感变量与教育变量),两个是教学风格变量(指令型教学风格与参与型教学风格):师生关系与教学风格相互关联。对教师的看法也不尽相同,取决于性别(女生比男生的看法更明确)和教育背景(教育背景较低的儿童对两种教学风格的看法更明确):原创性/价值:分析基于教师工作的对象(即学生)的视角。它提供了一个可在任何其他教育系统中复制的模型。以定期发放的问卷为基础的潜在变量,可以通过其他国家的诊断性评估数据进行估算,进而制定出考虑到学生反馈的、针对具体情况的教育政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian framework to evaluate evidence in cases of alleged cheating with secret codes in sports Unsupervised anomaly detection in spatio-temporal stream network sensor data A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education. A model of analysis Monitoring road infrastructures from satellite images in Greater Maputo: an object-oriented classification approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1