睁开眼睛,敞开心扉:认知自由化和群体间接触经验的概况

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1002/casp.2866
Giulia Fuochi, Jessica Boin, Alice Lucarini, Alberto Voci
{"title":"睁开眼睛,敞开心扉:认知自由化和群体间接触经验的概况","authors":"Giulia Fuochi,&nbsp;Jessica Boin,&nbsp;Alice Lucarini,&nbsp;Alberto Voci","doi":"10.1002/casp.2866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to the cognitive liberalization hypothesis, exposure to intergroup contact improves cognitive outcomes related to open-mindedness and out-of-the-box thinking. In a sample of Italian adults (<i>N</i> = 708), we: (a) investigated the profile of cognitive liberalization through a latent profile analysis including cognitive (i.e., cognitive flexibility, socio-cognitive mindfulness, curiosity and low need for structure) and socio-cultural (i.e., deprovincialization, beliefs supporting societal diversity and low social dominance orientation [SDO]) dimensions of cognitive liberalization; (b) tested how intergroup contact experiences differed between the profile of cognitive liberalization and the other profiles. Results showed three profiles: <i>Cognitive Liberalization</i> (high scores in both cognitive and socio-cultural dimensions of cognitive liberalization), <i>Cognitive Rigidity</i> (low scores on cognitive, high scores in socio-cultural dimensions) and <i>Anti-Liberalization</i> (low scores on all liberalization variables). Individuals belonging to the <i>Cognitive Liberalization</i> profile reported less negative, and more positive and intimate contact experiences with the outgroup compared with the other two profiles; they had a higher proportion of outgroup members in their acquaintances, and perceived those outgroup members involved in positive contact as more representative of their outgroup. Diversity of contacted outgroup members did not matter for the profiles. Close and positive relationships with the outgroup could be key to cognitive liberalization. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.2866","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open your eyes, open your mind: The profile of cognitive liberalization and intergroup contact experiences\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Fuochi,&nbsp;Jessica Boin,&nbsp;Alice Lucarini,&nbsp;Alberto Voci\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/casp.2866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>According to the cognitive liberalization hypothesis, exposure to intergroup contact improves cognitive outcomes related to open-mindedness and out-of-the-box thinking. In a sample of Italian adults (<i>N</i> = 708), we: (a) investigated the profile of cognitive liberalization through a latent profile analysis including cognitive (i.e., cognitive flexibility, socio-cognitive mindfulness, curiosity and low need for structure) and socio-cultural (i.e., deprovincialization, beliefs supporting societal diversity and low social dominance orientation [SDO]) dimensions of cognitive liberalization; (b) tested how intergroup contact experiences differed between the profile of cognitive liberalization and the other profiles. Results showed three profiles: <i>Cognitive Liberalization</i> (high scores in both cognitive and socio-cultural dimensions of cognitive liberalization), <i>Cognitive Rigidity</i> (low scores on cognitive, high scores in socio-cultural dimensions) and <i>Anti-Liberalization</i> (low scores on all liberalization variables). Individuals belonging to the <i>Cognitive Liberalization</i> profile reported less negative, and more positive and intimate contact experiences with the outgroup compared with the other two profiles; they had a higher proportion of outgroup members in their acquaintances, and perceived those outgroup members involved in positive contact as more representative of their outgroup. Diversity of contacted outgroup members did not matter for the profiles. Close and positive relationships with the outgroup could be key to cognitive liberalization. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.2866\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据认知自由化假说,群体间的接触会改善与开放性思维和发散性思维相关的认知结果。我们以意大利成年人为样本(N = 708):(a) 通过潜在特征分析研究了认知自由化的特征,包括认知自由化的认知维度(即认知灵活性、社会认知心智、好奇心和对结构的低需求)和社会文化维度(即非省籍化、支持社会多样性的信念和低社会支配取向 [SDO]);(b) 测试了认知自由化特征与其他特征之间的群体间接触经历有何不同。结果显示了三种情况:认知自由化(在认知自由化的认知维度和社会文化维度上都得高分)、认知僵化(在认知维度上得低分,在社会文化维度上得高分)和反自由化(在所有自由化变量上都得低分)。与其他两种特征相比,认知自由化特征的个体与外群体的负面接触经历较少,而正面和亲密接触经历较多;他们的熟人中外群体成员的比例较高,并认为正面接触的外群体成员更能代表他们的外群体。所接触的外群体成员的多样性与这些特征无关。与外群体建立密切和积极的关系可能是认知自由化的关键。请参阅 "补充材料 "部分查找本文的.NET版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open your eyes, open your mind: The profile of cognitive liberalization and intergroup contact experiences

According to the cognitive liberalization hypothesis, exposure to intergroup contact improves cognitive outcomes related to open-mindedness and out-of-the-box thinking. In a sample of Italian adults (N = 708), we: (a) investigated the profile of cognitive liberalization through a latent profile analysis including cognitive (i.e., cognitive flexibility, socio-cognitive mindfulness, curiosity and low need for structure) and socio-cultural (i.e., deprovincialization, beliefs supporting societal diversity and low social dominance orientation [SDO]) dimensions of cognitive liberalization; (b) tested how intergroup contact experiences differed between the profile of cognitive liberalization and the other profiles. Results showed three profiles: Cognitive Liberalization (high scores in both cognitive and socio-cultural dimensions of cognitive liberalization), Cognitive Rigidity (low scores on cognitive, high scores in socio-cultural dimensions) and Anti-Liberalization (low scores on all liberalization variables). Individuals belonging to the Cognitive Liberalization profile reported less negative, and more positive and intimate contact experiences with the outgroup compared with the other two profiles; they had a higher proportion of outgroup members in their acquaintances, and perceived those outgroup members involved in positive contact as more representative of their outgroup. Diversity of contacted outgroup members did not matter for the profiles. Close and positive relationships with the outgroup could be key to cognitive liberalization. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Positive During COVID-19: Women Academics' Strategies for Flourishing During a Pandemic Unveiling the Relationships Between Household Labor and Maternal Well-Being The Political Glass Cliff: When Ethnic, Racial and Immigration Minority Participants Choose Minority Candidates for Hard-To-Win Seats “I Would Not Change [My] Sibling for the World, Maybe the World Can Change for My Sibling”: The Experiences of Adult Siblings of People With Developmental Disabilities Exploring Secondary Transfer Generalisation Effects From Black and Gay Contact: The Role of Humanisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1