屈服才能茁壮成长:评估屈服状态(SoS)量表的心理测量特性及其与幸福感的关系

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100815
Thomas B. Sease , Mathew Andersland , David R. Perkins , Emily K. Sandoz , Caleb Jean , Hunter Sudduth , Cathy R. Cox
{"title":"屈服才能茁壮成长:评估屈服状态(SoS)量表的心理测量特性及其与幸福感的关系","authors":"Thomas B. Sease ,&nbsp;Mathew Andersland ,&nbsp;David R. Perkins ,&nbsp;Emily K. Sandoz ,&nbsp;Caleb Jean ,&nbsp;Hunter Sudduth ,&nbsp;Cathy R. Cox","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>State of Surrender (SoS)—the willingness to accept what is to come without resistance—has been conceptualized as a psychological state associated with heightened well-being. Conceptually, SoS bears a resemblance to existing constructs shown to be related to psychological health (e.g., psychological flexibility, mindfulness). As such, the purpose of this paper was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the SoS scale, demonstrate its novelty as a correlate of well-being, and experimentally manipulate a surrender state. Study 1 found that the SoS scale consisted of a single factor associated with thriving and flourishing, even while controlling for significant covariates. Study 2 confirmed the single-factor solution and identified social connectedness and self-compassion as statistical mediators of the relationship between SoS and happiness. Finally, Study 3 demonstrated that SoS could be manipulated using a mindfulness exercise; people completing a 10-min mindfulness practice reported higher levels of SoS when compared to a time-matched control. Implications and future directions are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surrendering to thrive: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the State of Surrender (SoS) scale and its relationship with well-being\",\"authors\":\"Thomas B. Sease ,&nbsp;Mathew Andersland ,&nbsp;David R. Perkins ,&nbsp;Emily K. Sandoz ,&nbsp;Caleb Jean ,&nbsp;Hunter Sudduth ,&nbsp;Cathy R. Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>State of Surrender (SoS)—the willingness to accept what is to come without resistance—has been conceptualized as a psychological state associated with heightened well-being. Conceptually, SoS bears a resemblance to existing constructs shown to be related to psychological health (e.g., psychological flexibility, mindfulness). As such, the purpose of this paper was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the SoS scale, demonstrate its novelty as a correlate of well-being, and experimentally manipulate a surrender state. Study 1 found that the SoS scale consisted of a single factor associated with thriving and flourishing, even while controlling for significant covariates. Study 2 confirmed the single-factor solution and identified social connectedness and self-compassion as statistical mediators of the relationship between SoS and happiness. Finally, Study 3 demonstrated that SoS could be manipulated using a mindfulness exercise; people completing a 10-min mindfulness practice reported higher levels of SoS when compared to a time-matched control. Implications and future directions are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000954\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

屈服状态(SoS)--不加抵抗地接受即将发生的事情的意愿--已被概念化为一种与提高幸福感相关的心理状态。从概念上讲,SoS 与现有的与心理健康相关的概念(如心理灵活性、正念)有相似之处。因此,本文旨在评估 SoS 量表的心理测量特性,证明其作为幸福感相关因素的新颖性,并通过实验操纵投降状态。研究 1 发现,即使控制了重要的协变量,SoS 量表也只包含一个与欣欣向荣和蒸蒸日上相关的单因子。研究 2 证实了单因素解决方案,并确定社会联系和自我同情是 SoS 与幸福之间关系的统计学中介。最后,研究 3 表明,SoS 可以通过正念练习来操纵;与时间匹配的对照组相比,完成 10 分钟正念练习的人报告的 SoS 水平更高。本文讨论了研究的意义和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surrendering to thrive: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the State of Surrender (SoS) scale and its relationship with well-being

State of Surrender (SoS)—the willingness to accept what is to come without resistance—has been conceptualized as a psychological state associated with heightened well-being. Conceptually, SoS bears a resemblance to existing constructs shown to be related to psychological health (e.g., psychological flexibility, mindfulness). As such, the purpose of this paper was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the SoS scale, demonstrate its novelty as a correlate of well-being, and experimentally manipulate a surrender state. Study 1 found that the SoS scale consisted of a single factor associated with thriving and flourishing, even while controlling for significant covariates. Study 2 confirmed the single-factor solution and identified social connectedness and self-compassion as statistical mediators of the relationship between SoS and happiness. Finally, Study 3 demonstrated that SoS could be manipulated using a mindfulness exercise; people completing a 10-min mindfulness practice reported higher levels of SoS when compared to a time-matched control. Implications and future directions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis Capturing the context of drug use for college students: A contextual behavioural science informed qualitative analysis of harm reduction practices using network feedback loops simulation modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1