学龄儿童(6-11 岁)使用亲子共同回忆的范围界定研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.088
Yu-Chen Lin BS, Sina Gallo RDN, PhD, MS, Suzanne Baxter PhD, LD, RD, Staci Belcher MS, RD, Emmaline Peterson BS, RD, Casey Roberson, Tiolulope Popoola
{"title":"学龄儿童(6-11 岁)使用亲子共同回忆的范围界定研究","authors":"Yu-Chen Lin BS,&nbsp;Sina Gallo RDN, PhD, MS,&nbsp;Suzanne Baxter PhD, LD, RD,&nbsp;Staci Belcher MS, RD,&nbsp;Emmaline Peterson BS, RD,&nbsp;Casey Roberson,&nbsp;Tiolulope Popoola","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside &gt;6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on the Use of Parent-Child Joint Recalls Among School-Aged Children (6–11 Years)\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chen Lin BS,&nbsp;Sina Gallo RDN, PhD, MS,&nbsp;Suzanne Baxter PhD, LD, RD,&nbsp;Staci Belcher MS, RD,&nbsp;Emmaline Peterson BS, RD,&nbsp;Casey Roberson,&nbsp;Tiolulope Popoola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside &gt;6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Page S37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400188X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400188X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由于发育和认知能力不成熟,对儿童进行饮食摄入量评估具有挑战性,因此饮食回忆是学龄儿童的首选工具。全国性调查通常在学龄儿童中使用共识或亲子 "联合回忆"。为了推动膳食评估领域的发展并评估营养教育的有效性,有必要了解文献中是如何报道联合回忆的。目的 对儿童中亲子联合膳食回忆的使用情况以及支持其使用的理由/依据进行范围界定。研究设计、设置、参与者使用《系统综述和荟萃分析扩展报告首选项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review)核对表。可衡量的结果/分析检索了五个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register),以确定有关 6-11 岁儿童膳食摄入评估的文章。除综述、荟萃分析、会议摘要、信件、指南、评论、社论和案例研究/报告外,所有以英语发表的同行评审研究均符合条件。在进行全文审查的 2,216 篇文章中,有 1,415 篇被排除在外(平均年龄在 6 岁以下且小于 12 岁、无联合回忆、无饮食回忆、非英语、重复发表、非研究性学习、非人类研究、其他)。在剩余的 801 篇文章中,306 篇不明确(缺乏饮食回忆细节),495 篇符合纳入标准(其中 210 篇为全国性调查,225 篇为横断面研究,36 篇为队列研究,15 篇为随机对照试验,9 篇为病例对照研究)。在这 495 项研究中,有 388 项采用了联合回忆法。结论总体而言,801 篇文章中有 38% 缺乏饮食回忆细节,801 篇文章中有 74% 未引用参考文献以支持使用联合回忆。研究结果凸显了文献在描述学龄儿童饮食回顾方面存在的重要空白。需要制定作者指南,提供学龄儿童饮食回忆的详细信息,以确保一致性并改进与饮食相关的营养研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Scoping Review on the Use of Parent-Child Joint Recalls Among School-Aged Children (6–11 Years)

Background

Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.

Objective

To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.

Results

Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside >6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.

Conclusions

Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.

Funding

None

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
"All You Need to Manage Blood Pressure": A Comprehensive e-Education Program for Hypertension. Highlighting the Importance of Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Interventions in Nutrition Education and Behavior? Impact of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend and Nutrition Education on Child Growth, Caregivers' Nutrition Knowledge, and WASH Practices. Nutrition Education in Primary Care: Comparing Video vs Handout Interventions. The 2022 Minnesota Statewide Food Shelf Survey: Reported Availability of Healthy Foods and Importance of Culturally-specific Foods by Participant Demographic Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1