一所中西部私立大学的课余时间和食品安全状况

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.089
{"title":"一所中西部私立大学的课余时间和食品安全状况","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The prevalence of food insecurity on college campuses is higher than U.S. households; however it is unknown how academic breaks affect the food security status.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate if breaks in the academic calendar change the food security status of undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study used a repeated cross-sectional design. Two online surveys were distributed in November 2023 (the semester) and January 2024 (academic break). Eligible participants were at least 18 years old and full-time undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Participants completed the USDA Food Security Survey Short-Form (6-item) with a 2-item screener at both time points to measure food security. Based on a raw score, each participant was assigned a food security status (high or marginal food security, low food security, or very-low food security) during the semester and break. Differences in food security status between the semester and break were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Ranked Signs Test. Participants also answered demographic, housing, transportation, and food resource questions at each time point. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe the study sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 57 participants completed both surveys. Most participants were female (75%), white (77%), and had financial aid to pay for tuition (98%). During the semester, 37% of the participants reported low or very-low food security in comparison to 30% during the break. There was no significant difference in students’ food security status between the semester and the break. Post hoc tests revealed a significant difference in food security status and housing during the break only [F(2,53) = 3.954, p=0.25]. Those living with a family member during the break had better food security than those living in off-campus housing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted. Investigation is also needed to understand the relationship between housing during academic breaks and food security status.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Bradley University Office of Sponsored Programs</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Breaks and Food Security Status at a Midwestern Private University\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The prevalence of food insecurity on college campuses is higher than U.S. households; however it is unknown how academic breaks affect the food security status.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate if breaks in the academic calendar change the food security status of undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study used a repeated cross-sectional design. Two online surveys were distributed in November 2023 (the semester) and January 2024 (academic break). Eligible participants were at least 18 years old and full-time undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Participants completed the USDA Food Security Survey Short-Form (6-item) with a 2-item screener at both time points to measure food security. Based on a raw score, each participant was assigned a food security status (high or marginal food security, low food security, or very-low food security) during the semester and break. Differences in food security status between the semester and break were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Ranked Signs Test. Participants also answered demographic, housing, transportation, and food resource questions at each time point. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe the study sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 57 participants completed both surveys. Most participants were female (75%), white (77%), and had financial aid to pay for tuition (98%). During the semester, 37% of the participants reported low or very-low food security in comparison to 30% during the break. There was no significant difference in students’ food security status between the semester and the break. Post hoc tests revealed a significant difference in food security status and housing during the break only [F(2,53) = 3.954, p=0.25]. Those living with a family member during the break had better food security than those living in off-campus housing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted. Investigation is also needed to understand the relationship between housing during academic breaks and food security status.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Bradley University Office of Sponsored Programs</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景大学校园中食品不安全的发生率高于美国家庭,但学业假期对食品安全状况的影响尚不清楚。研究设计、环境、参与者本研究采用重复横断面设计。在 2023 年 11 月(学期)和 2024 年 1 月(学年假期)分发了两份在线调查问卷。符合条件的参与者至少年满 18 周岁,并且是中西部一所私立大学的全日制本科生。可衡量的结果/分析参与者在两个时间点均填写了美国农业部食品安全调查短表(6 项)和 2 项筛选器,以衡量食品安全状况。根据原始得分,每个参与者在学期和假期都会被分配到一个食品安全状态(高或边缘食品安全、低食品安全或极低食品安全)。使用 Wilcoxon 排列符号检验分析了学期和假期期间的食品安全状况差异。参与者还回答了每个时间点的人口统计学、住房、交通和食物资源问题。结果 共有 57 名参与者完成了这两项调查。大多数参与者为女性(75%)、白人(77%),并有经济援助支付学费(98%)。在学期中,37% 的参与者表示食物安全感较低或非常低,而在假期中,这一比例为 30%。在学期和假期之间,学生的食品安全状况没有明显差异。事后检验表明,只有在放假期间,学生的食品安全状况和住房情况才存在显著差异[F(2,53) = 3.954, p=0.25]。与住在校外宿舍的学生相比,在放假期间与家人住在一起的学生的食品安全状况更好。还需要进行调查,以了解休学期间的住房与食品安全状况之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Breaks and Food Security Status at a Midwestern Private University

Background

The prevalence of food insecurity on college campuses is higher than U.S. households; however it is unknown how academic breaks affect the food security status.

Objective

Evaluate if breaks in the academic calendar change the food security status of undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

This study used a repeated cross-sectional design. Two online surveys were distributed in November 2023 (the semester) and January 2024 (academic break). Eligible participants were at least 18 years old and full-time undergraduate students at a Midwestern private university.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Participants completed the USDA Food Security Survey Short-Form (6-item) with a 2-item screener at both time points to measure food security. Based on a raw score, each participant was assigned a food security status (high or marginal food security, low food security, or very-low food security) during the semester and break. Differences in food security status between the semester and break were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Ranked Signs Test. Participants also answered demographic, housing, transportation, and food resource questions at each time point. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe the study sample.

Results

A total of 57 participants completed both surveys. Most participants were female (75%), white (77%), and had financial aid to pay for tuition (98%). During the semester, 37% of the participants reported low or very-low food security in comparison to 30% during the break. There was no significant difference in students’ food security status between the semester and the break. Post hoc tests revealed a significant difference in food security status and housing during the break only [F(2,53) = 3.954, p=0.25]. Those living with a family member during the break had better food security than those living in off-campus housing.

Conclusions

Studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted. Investigation is also needed to understand the relationship between housing during academic breaks and food security status.

Funding

Bradley University Office of Sponsored Programs

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
Common Feeding Practices Used by Chinese Caregivers of 6-10-Month-Old Infants: A Behavioral Observation Study in Shaanxi Province. A Proposed Cost-Benefit Analysis of Adult EFNEP Utilizing Biomarkers of Chronic Disease Risk. Table of Contents Students’ Perspectives on the Benefits and Challenges of Universal School Meals Related to Food Accessibility, Stigma, Participation, and Waste Evaluating the Validity of the PortionSize Smartphone Application for Estimating Dietary Intake in Free-Living Conditions: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1