为美国食品零售商开发减少食物浪费承诺问卷工具

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.013
Ren Chan BS, Mi Zhou PhD, MPH, Susan Chen PhD
{"title":"为美国食品零售商开发减少食物浪费承诺问卷工具","authors":"Ren Chan BS,&nbsp;Mi Zhou PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Susan Chen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States (U.S.), approximately one-third of the food supply is wasted. Although few food waste policies exist to enforce food waste reduction (FWR) in food retail settings, many food retailers (FR) have corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments to reduce food waste. To date, no evidence-based measurement tools exclusive for evaluating FWR efforts in food retail exist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate FRs’ commitments to reduce food waste.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study had two phases; 1) to review existing literature to guide questionnaire development and 2) to conduct cognitive interviews to assess face validity of the developed questionnaire. Literature on existing FWR and sustainability frameworks guided the development of questionnaire items. Feedback for the questionnaire was gathered through structured cognitive interviews. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria were that they were older than 18 years, worked in the U.S., and worked as a food systems researcher/professional.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Participants were asked about the overall questionnaire, areas that needed clarification, and the scoring system. Interviews continued until data saturation was met. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, de-identified, and analyzed for recurring themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial questionnaire contained six domains informed by existing FWR literature. These included current FWR commitments, food waste prevention practices, food rescue practices, food recycling practices, other sustainability-informed practices, and future commitments. Participants of the cognitive interview (n=4) mentioned that the tool was comprehensive and aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency Wasted Food Scale. Suggestions for improvement included adding a domain to address retailers employee education for FWR, improving readability of the questionnaire, and including examples of public FWR policies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This evidence-based questionnaire comprehensively addresses areas for FWR among US FR. Future researchers can use this questionnaire to assess current CSR commitments toward FWR. Additionally, FR and policymakers can use this tool to guide the development of FWR initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Circle of Friends</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of a Food Waste Reduction Commitments Questionnaire Tool for Food Retailers in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Ren Chan BS,&nbsp;Mi Zhou PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Susan Chen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States (U.S.), approximately one-third of the food supply is wasted. Although few food waste policies exist to enforce food waste reduction (FWR) in food retail settings, many food retailers (FR) have corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments to reduce food waste. To date, no evidence-based measurement tools exclusive for evaluating FWR efforts in food retail exist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate FRs’ commitments to reduce food waste.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study had two phases; 1) to review existing literature to guide questionnaire development and 2) to conduct cognitive interviews to assess face validity of the developed questionnaire. Literature on existing FWR and sustainability frameworks guided the development of questionnaire items. Feedback for the questionnaire was gathered through structured cognitive interviews. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria were that they were older than 18 years, worked in the U.S., and worked as a food systems researcher/professional.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Participants were asked about the overall questionnaire, areas that needed clarification, and the scoring system. Interviews continued until data saturation was met. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, de-identified, and analyzed for recurring themes using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The initial questionnaire contained six domains informed by existing FWR literature. These included current FWR commitments, food waste prevention practices, food rescue practices, food recycling practices, other sustainability-informed practices, and future commitments. Participants of the cognitive interview (n=4) mentioned that the tool was comprehensive and aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency Wasted Food Scale. Suggestions for improvement included adding a domain to address retailers employee education for FWR, improving readability of the questionnaire, and including examples of public FWR policies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This evidence-based questionnaire comprehensively addresses areas for FWR among US FR. Future researchers can use this questionnaire to assess current CSR commitments toward FWR. Additionally, FR and policymakers can use this tool to guide the development of FWR initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Circle of Friends</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国约有三分之一的食品被浪费。虽然在食品零售环境中很少有减少食物浪费(FWR)的政策,但许多食品零售商(FR)都有减少食物浪费的企业社会责任(CSR)承诺。本研究分为两个阶段:1)回顾现有文献以指导问卷开发;2)进行认知访谈以评估所开发问卷的面效度。有关现有 FWR 和可持续性框架的文献为问卷项目的开发提供了指导。通过结构化认知访谈收集了对问卷的反馈意见。参与者是通过有目的的抽样招募的。可衡量的结果/分析参与者被问及整个问卷、需要澄清的领域以及评分系统。访谈一直持续到数据饱和为止。对访谈进行录音,使用 Otter.AI 进行转录,去除身份标识,并使用归纳式主题分析法对重复出现的主题进行分析。这些领域包括当前的 FWR 承诺、防止食物浪费实践、食物救援实践、食物回收实践、其他可持续发展实践以及未来承诺。认知访谈的参与者(n=4)提到,该工具很全面,与环境保护署的浪费食物量表一致。改进建议包括增加一个领域,以解决零售商员工的 FWR 教育问题,提高问卷的可读性,以及加入公共 FWR 政策的实例。未来的研究人员可以利用这份问卷来评估当前企业对 FWR 的承诺。此外,联邦共和国和政策制定者可以利用这一工具来指导 FWR 计划的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Development of a Food Waste Reduction Commitments Questionnaire Tool for Food Retailers in the United States

Background

In the United States (U.S.), approximately one-third of the food supply is wasted. Although few food waste policies exist to enforce food waste reduction (FWR) in food retail settings, many food retailers (FR) have corporate social responsibility (CSR) commitments to reduce food waste. To date, no evidence-based measurement tools exclusive for evaluating FWR efforts in food retail exist.

Objective

To develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate FRs’ commitments to reduce food waste.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

This study had two phases; 1) to review existing literature to guide questionnaire development and 2) to conduct cognitive interviews to assess face validity of the developed questionnaire. Literature on existing FWR and sustainability frameworks guided the development of questionnaire items. Feedback for the questionnaire was gathered through structured cognitive interviews. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria were that they were older than 18 years, worked in the U.S., and worked as a food systems researcher/professional.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Participants were asked about the overall questionnaire, areas that needed clarification, and the scoring system. Interviews continued until data saturation was met. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, de-identified, and analyzed for recurring themes using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

The initial questionnaire contained six domains informed by existing FWR literature. These included current FWR commitments, food waste prevention practices, food rescue practices, food recycling practices, other sustainability-informed practices, and future commitments. Participants of the cognitive interview (n=4) mentioned that the tool was comprehensive and aligned with the Environmental Protection Agency Wasted Food Scale. Suggestions for improvement included adding a domain to address retailers employee education for FWR, improving readability of the questionnaire, and including examples of public FWR policies.

Conclusions

This evidence-based questionnaire comprehensively addresses areas for FWR among US FR. Future researchers can use this questionnaire to assess current CSR commitments toward FWR. Additionally, FR and policymakers can use this tool to guide the development of FWR initiatives.

Funding

Circle of Friends

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1