管道政治:在欧盟-俄罗斯联邦关系中平衡能源需求和环境问题?

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103698
{"title":"管道政治:在欧盟-俄罗斯联邦关系中平衡能源需求和环境问题?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For decades the European Union has been building its normative identity on the international scene. In line with this goal, one of its core normative priorities became environmentalism and the fight against climate change, visible especially in the policies related to greenhouse gas emissions reductions or shifts away from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources. Hence, within this article, we evaluate this proclaimed self-identification as a global environmental leader through the stances of the Union towards the Nord Stream 2 project. With the help of Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) and a sentiment analysis, we juxtapose the environmentalist claims against the reality of energy-driven interests of the block and a major natural gas pipeline from Russia. Moreover, we contrast the European ideal with the Russian pragmatism about fossil fuel projects and thus highlight the differing approaches to the pipeline over the years 2015–2021. Our analysis therefore adds to the critical discourse on the Normative Power Europe (NPE) concept but also questions the illusive Russian interest in environmentalism evident in our results, which we evaluate as a mere selling tactic for the pipeline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pipeline politics: Balancing energy needs and environmental concerns in European Union - Russian Federation relations?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For decades the European Union has been building its normative identity on the international scene. In line with this goal, one of its core normative priorities became environmentalism and the fight against climate change, visible especially in the policies related to greenhouse gas emissions reductions or shifts away from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources. Hence, within this article, we evaluate this proclaimed self-identification as a global environmental leader through the stances of the Union towards the Nord Stream 2 project. With the help of Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) and a sentiment analysis, we juxtapose the environmentalist claims against the reality of energy-driven interests of the block and a major natural gas pipeline from Russia. Moreover, we contrast the European ideal with the Russian pragmatism about fossil fuel projects and thus highlight the differing approaches to the pipeline over the years 2015–2021. Our analysis therefore adds to the critical discourse on the Normative Power Europe (NPE) concept but also questions the illusive Russian interest in environmentalism evident in our results, which we evaluate as a mere selling tactic for the pipeline.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,欧洲联盟一直在国际舞台上树立自己的规范身份。根据这一目标,欧盟的核心规范优先事项之一是环保和应对气候变化,这在与温室气体减排或从化石燃料转向可持续能源相关的政策中尤为明显。因此,在本文中,我们将通过欧盟对北溪 2 号项目的立场来评估其作为全球环保领导者的自我定位。在定性内容分析(QCA)和情感分析的帮助下,我们将环保主义者的主张与该地区能源利益驱动的现实和来自俄罗斯的主要天然气管道并列起来。此外,在化石燃料项目方面,我们将欧洲的理想与俄罗斯的实用主义进行了对比,从而突出了 2015-2021 年间对该管道的不同态度。因此,我们的分析为有关规范权力欧洲(NPE)概念的批判性讨论增添了新的内容,但同时也质疑了我们的分析结果所体现的俄罗斯对环保主义的虚幻兴趣,我们将其评价为仅仅是管道的一种销售策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pipeline politics: Balancing energy needs and environmental concerns in European Union - Russian Federation relations?

For decades the European Union has been building its normative identity on the international scene. In line with this goal, one of its core normative priorities became environmentalism and the fight against climate change, visible especially in the policies related to greenhouse gas emissions reductions or shifts away from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources. Hence, within this article, we evaluate this proclaimed self-identification as a global environmental leader through the stances of the Union towards the Nord Stream 2 project. With the help of Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) and a sentiment analysis, we juxtapose the environmentalist claims against the reality of energy-driven interests of the block and a major natural gas pipeline from Russia. Moreover, we contrast the European ideal with the Russian pragmatism about fossil fuel projects and thus highlight the differing approaches to the pipeline over the years 2015–2021. Our analysis therefore adds to the critical discourse on the Normative Power Europe (NPE) concept but also questions the illusive Russian interest in environmentalism evident in our results, which we evaluate as a mere selling tactic for the pipeline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1