{"title":"供应商机会主义的数字治理:供应商透明度的中介作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Curtailing supplier opportunism is a critical concern for both business practitioners and supply chain researchers. However, ambiguity remains regarding the effective deployment of digital technologies (DTs) within supply chain practices to address this issue. Drawing on the asset orchestration perspective, we consider two DT deployment manners (i.e., breadth and depth) and examine their impacts on supplier transparency and supplier opportunism. We investigate 323 Chinese firms and use structural equation modeling to test the proposed hypotheses. We also conduct a scenario-based experiment involving 144 business managers to improve the robustness of our results. We find that although two DT deployment manners positively affect suppliers' cost and relationship transparency, only relationship transparency exhibits a statistically significant negative association with suppliers’ weak opportunism, rather than strong opportunism. More interestingly, of the two DT deployment manners, relationship transparency merely mediates the breadth – weak opportunism association. We advance research on supply chain governance by elucidating the nuanced role of DT deployment in curbing supplier opportunism. We also offer significant insights for firms seeking to reassess their digital supply chain plans, improve engagement with suppliers, and curb unethical practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital governance for supplier opportunism: The mediating role of supplier transparency\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Curtailing supplier opportunism is a critical concern for both business practitioners and supply chain researchers. However, ambiguity remains regarding the effective deployment of digital technologies (DTs) within supply chain practices to address this issue. Drawing on the asset orchestration perspective, we consider two DT deployment manners (i.e., breadth and depth) and examine their impacts on supplier transparency and supplier opportunism. We investigate 323 Chinese firms and use structural equation modeling to test the proposed hypotheses. We also conduct a scenario-based experiment involving 144 business managers to improve the robustness of our results. We find that although two DT deployment manners positively affect suppliers' cost and relationship transparency, only relationship transparency exhibits a statistically significant negative association with suppliers’ weak opportunism, rather than strong opportunism. More interestingly, of the two DT deployment manners, relationship transparency merely mediates the breadth – weak opportunism association. We advance research on supply chain governance by elucidating the nuanced role of DT deployment in curbing supplier opportunism. We also offer significant insights for firms seeking to reassess their digital supply chain plans, improve engagement with suppliers, and curb unethical practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002081\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324002081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital governance for supplier opportunism: The mediating role of supplier transparency
Curtailing supplier opportunism is a critical concern for both business practitioners and supply chain researchers. However, ambiguity remains regarding the effective deployment of digital technologies (DTs) within supply chain practices to address this issue. Drawing on the asset orchestration perspective, we consider two DT deployment manners (i.e., breadth and depth) and examine their impacts on supplier transparency and supplier opportunism. We investigate 323 Chinese firms and use structural equation modeling to test the proposed hypotheses. We also conduct a scenario-based experiment involving 144 business managers to improve the robustness of our results. We find that although two DT deployment manners positively affect suppliers' cost and relationship transparency, only relationship transparency exhibits a statistically significant negative association with suppliers’ weak opportunism, rather than strong opportunism. More interestingly, of the two DT deployment manners, relationship transparency merely mediates the breadth – weak opportunism association. We advance research on supply chain governance by elucidating the nuanced role of DT deployment in curbing supplier opportunism. We also offer significant insights for firms seeking to reassess their digital supply chain plans, improve engagement with suppliers, and curb unethical practices.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.