国际贸易与生物多样性:出口是物种杀手吗?

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313
{"title":"国际贸易与生物多样性:出口是物种杀手吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International trade and biodiversity: Is export a species killer?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球物种多样性不断恶化,这与全球贸易有着广泛的联系。以往的研究发现了特定贸易商品对物种多样性的影响,但很少有证据表明与整体出口存在因果关系。本文利用带工具变量的两阶段最小二乘法(IV-2SLS)和 1978-2020 年期间的省级面板数据,通过研究中国出口对国内物种多样性的影响,探讨国际贸易的生物成本。我们还研究了出口影响物种多样性的机制,以及异质性因素如何导致物种多样性损失的差异。结果表明,出口规模每增加 1%,物种多样性就会减少 2.28%。我们还发现,资源开发、基础设施建设和土地利用是三个主要渠道。此外,外来入侵物种较多(超过 450 种)或皮革和纺织品出口依存度较高(超过 16%)的省份,出口规模每增加 1%,物种多样性损失可能超过 4%。此外,植物的损失率为 2.43%,比动物高出 0.83%。我们的跨学科工作有望为追求出口发展和生物多样性保护双重目标的政策制定者提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International trade and biodiversity: Is export a species killer?

Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Extending the Genuine Savings estimates with natural capital and poverty at the regional and national level in Italy Animal welfare, moral consumers and the optimal regulation of animal food production Is pro-environmental effort affected by information about others’ behavior? Incorporating use values into ecosystem specific accounts: Recreational value generated by saltmarsh at a mixed ecosystem site The biodiversity premium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1