城市共享单车网络设计中的规划因素:定性研究

Mathias Willnat, Lukas Borchers, Tim-Benjamin Lembcke, Lutz M. Kolbe
{"title":"城市共享单车网络设计中的规划因素:定性研究","authors":"Mathias Willnat,&nbsp;Lukas Borchers,&nbsp;Tim-Benjamin Lembcke,&nbsp;Lutz M. Kolbe","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban mobility planning is increasingly characterized by the pressure to establish low-emission, space-efficient, and socially inclusive transport services. One such planning task for decision-makers in public institutions is the efficient design of bicycle-sharing networks. This study examines the factors that influence decision-making in this process, both among practitioners and within the research literature on decision support systems (DSS). Employing a dual approach of academic literature review and 16 qualitative interviews with public sector planners, we identify and compare different dimensions of key factors affecting location choice. The results reveal significant contrasts, for instance, between the emphasis placed by academic researchers on ensemble optimization of quantifiable factors and the more target-complex, intuitive approaches pursued by public planning practitioners. We blend core characteristics from both perspectives in a synthesis analysis. We argue that future efforts should aim for more vertical planning assistance, citizen involvement for diversified demand indications, integration of local factors into DSS, and standardized data formats to enable better DSS integration. Our study offers a rare qualitative insight into a complex choice problem faced by public decision-makers, linked with predominantly quantitative research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001763/pdfft?md5=617d3a6ece382ae8c12c52636bbf2f34&pid=1-s2.0-S2590198224001763-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning factors in municipal bikesharing network design: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Willnat,&nbsp;Lukas Borchers,&nbsp;Tim-Benjamin Lembcke,&nbsp;Lutz M. Kolbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urban mobility planning is increasingly characterized by the pressure to establish low-emission, space-efficient, and socially inclusive transport services. One such planning task for decision-makers in public institutions is the efficient design of bicycle-sharing networks. This study examines the factors that influence decision-making in this process, both among practitioners and within the research literature on decision support systems (DSS). Employing a dual approach of academic literature review and 16 qualitative interviews with public sector planners, we identify and compare different dimensions of key factors affecting location choice. The results reveal significant contrasts, for instance, between the emphasis placed by academic researchers on ensemble optimization of quantifiable factors and the more target-complex, intuitive approaches pursued by public planning practitioners. We blend core characteristics from both perspectives in a synthesis analysis. We argue that future efforts should aim for more vertical planning assistance, citizen involvement for diversified demand indications, integration of local factors into DSS, and standardized data formats to enable better DSS integration. Our study offers a rare qualitative insight into a complex choice problem faced by public decision-makers, linked with predominantly quantitative research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001763/pdfft?md5=617d3a6ece382ae8c12c52636bbf2f34&pid=1-s2.0-S2590198224001763-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224001763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在城市交通规划中,建立低排放、节省空间、具有社会包容性的交通服务的压力越来越大。公共机构决策者的一项规划任务就是高效设计共享单车网络。本研究探讨了在这一过程中影响决策的因素,既包括从业人员之间的因素,也包括决策支持系统(DSS)研究文献中的因素。我们采用学术文献综述和对公共部门规划人员进行 16 次定性访谈的双重方法,确定并比较了影响地点选择的关键因素的不同维度。结果表明,学术研究人员强调对可量化因素进行组合优化,而公共规划从业人员则追求目标复杂、直观的方法,两者之间存在明显的对比。我们在综合分析中融合了两种观点的核心特征。我们认为,未来的工作应着眼于提供更多的纵向规划协助、让市民参与多样化的需求指示、将本地因素纳入设计支持系统以及标准化的数据格式,以便更好地整合设计支持系统。我们的研究为公共决策者面临的复杂选择问题提供了难得的定性洞察,并与主要的定量研究相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planning factors in municipal bikesharing network design: A qualitative study

Urban mobility planning is increasingly characterized by the pressure to establish low-emission, space-efficient, and socially inclusive transport services. One such planning task for decision-makers in public institutions is the efficient design of bicycle-sharing networks. This study examines the factors that influence decision-making in this process, both among practitioners and within the research literature on decision support systems (DSS). Employing a dual approach of academic literature review and 16 qualitative interviews with public sector planners, we identify and compare different dimensions of key factors affecting location choice. The results reveal significant contrasts, for instance, between the emphasis placed by academic researchers on ensemble optimization of quantifiable factors and the more target-complex, intuitive approaches pursued by public planning practitioners. We blend core characteristics from both perspectives in a synthesis analysis. We argue that future efforts should aim for more vertical planning assistance, citizen involvement for diversified demand indications, integration of local factors into DSS, and standardized data formats to enable better DSS integration. Our study offers a rare qualitative insight into a complex choice problem faced by public decision-makers, linked with predominantly quantitative research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1