Y. Uehara , Y. Takeyasu , T. Yoshida , A. Tateishi , M. Torasawa , Y. Hosomi , K. Masuda , Y. Shinno , Y. Matsumoto , Y. Okuma , Y. Goto , H. Horinouchi , N. Yamamoto , Y. Ohe
{"title":"晚期表皮生长因子受体突变 NSCLC 一线奥西替尼、第一代/第二代 EGFR-TKIs 后奥西替尼和不使用奥西替尼治疗策略的实际效果","authors":"Y. Uehara , Y. Takeyasu , T. Yoshida , A. Tateishi , M. Torasawa , Y. Hosomi , K. Masuda , Y. Shinno , Y. Matsumoto , Y. Okuma , Y. Goto , H. Horinouchi , N. Yamamoto , Y. Ohe","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365/pdfft?md5=443d03e84858c940edfdcbd7200813be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes of treatment strategy between first-line osimertinib, first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib and without osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"Y. Uehara , Y. Takeyasu , T. Yoshida , A. Tateishi , M. Torasawa , Y. Hosomi , K. Masuda , Y. Shinno , Y. Matsumoto , Y. Okuma , Y. Goto , H. Horinouchi , N. Yamamoto , Y. Ohe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365/pdfft?md5=443d03e84858c940edfdcbd7200813be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000365-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world outcomes of treatment strategy between first-line osimertinib, first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib and without osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC
Background
Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).
Materials and methods
We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.
Results
Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.