晚期表皮生长因子受体突变 NSCLC 一线奥西替尼、第一代/第二代 EGFR-TKIs 后奥西替尼和不使用奥西替尼治疗策略的实际效果

Y. Uehara , Y. Takeyasu , T. Yoshida , A. Tateishi , M. Torasawa , Y. Hosomi , K. Masuda , Y. Shinno , Y. Matsumoto , Y. Okuma , Y. Goto , H. Horinouchi , N. Yamamoto , Y. Ohe
{"title":"晚期表皮生长因子受体突变 NSCLC 一线奥西替尼、第一代/第二代 EGFR-TKIs 后奥西替尼和不使用奥西替尼治疗策略的实际效果","authors":"Y. Uehara ,&nbsp;Y. Takeyasu ,&nbsp;T. Yoshida ,&nbsp;A. Tateishi ,&nbsp;M. Torasawa ,&nbsp;Y. Hosomi ,&nbsp;K. Masuda ,&nbsp;Y. Shinno ,&nbsp;Y. Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Y. Okuma ,&nbsp;Y. Goto ,&nbsp;H. Horinouchi ,&nbsp;N. Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Y. Ohe","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365/pdfft?md5=443d03e84858c940edfdcbd7200813be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes of treatment strategy between first-line osimertinib, first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib and without osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"Y. Uehara ,&nbsp;Y. Takeyasu ,&nbsp;T. Yoshida ,&nbsp;A. Tateishi ,&nbsp;M. Torasawa ,&nbsp;Y. Hosomi ,&nbsp;K. Masuda ,&nbsp;Y. Shinno ,&nbsp;Y. Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Y. Okuma ,&nbsp;Y. Goto ,&nbsp;H. Horinouchi ,&nbsp;N. Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Y. Ohe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365/pdfft?md5=443d03e84858c940edfdcbd7200813be&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000365-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景奥希替尼一直是表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法。我们评估了奥希替尼与第一代/第二代(1G/2G)表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)一线治疗(1L)的疗效,并研究了T790M状态和1G/2G EGFR-TKI失败后序贯奥希替尼对总生存期(OS)的影响。材料与方法我们回顾性评估了2015年1月至2021年3月期间携带19号外显子缺失或L858R突变的晚期NSCLC患者接受奥希替尼和1G/2G EGFR-TKIs作为1L治疗的结果。在探索性分析中,我们分析了三组患者的治疗结果:奥希莫替尼1L治疗组(1L-Osi)、1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs后奥希莫替尼治疗组(2L-Osi)和1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs无奥希莫替尼治疗组(No-Osi)。结果 485例患者中,213例和272例分别接受了1L奥希替尼和1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs治疗。所有2L-Osi患者在1G/2G EGFR-TKI治疗失败后都出现了T790M突变。OS 与 1L EGFR-TKIs 没有差异[osimertinib 与 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 与 41.8 个月;危险比 (HR) 0.92; 95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.65-1.29]。在为期12个月的地标分析中,1L-Osi的中位OS为34.4个月[95% CI 21.3个月-未达标(NR)],2L-Osi为63.8个月(95% CI 46.0个月-NR),No-Osi为22.5个月(95% CI 19.0-35.3个月)。结论对于表皮生长因子受体突变的NSCLC患者,奥希替尼和1G/2G EGFR-TKIs作为1L治疗药物在OS方面没有显著差异。然而,对于将获得T790M突变的患者,在1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs治疗后使用2L奥希替尼与1L奥希替尼相比具有更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world outcomes of treatment strategy between first-line osimertinib, first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib and without osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Background

Osimertinib has been the standard of care in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes between osimertinib and first/second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line (1L), and investigated how T790M status and sequential osimertinib after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure affected overall survival (OS).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment from January 2015 to March 2021. In the exploratory analysis, we analyzed the outcomes among three groups: osimertinib as 1L (1L-Osi), 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs followed by osimertinib (2L-Osi), and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs without osimertinib (No-Osi). Propensity score matching (PSM) and 12-month landmark analysis were used to mitigate selection bias and immortal time bias.

Results

Of 485 patients, 213 and 272 received 1L osimertinib and 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. All 2L-Osi patients had T790M mutations after 1G/2G EGFR-TKI failure. OS did not differ according to 1L EGFR-TKIs [osimertinib versus 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs; 33.7 versus 41.8 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.29]. In the 12-month landmark analysis, the median OS was 34.4 months [95% CI 21.3 months-not reached (NR)] in 1L-Osi, 63.8 months (95% CI 46.0 months-NR) in 2L-Osi, and 22.5 months (95% CI 19.0-35.3 months) in No-Osi. After PSM, similar results were observed.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in OS between osimertinib and 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs as 1L treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, 2L osimertinib following 1L 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in patients who would acquire T790M mutation has been linked to a better prognosis compared to 1L osimertinib.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utility of automated data transfer for cancer clinical trials and considerations for implementation Characterisation of oncology EHR-derived real-world data in the UK, Germany, and Japan Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network Collaborating across sectors in service of open science, precision oncology, and patients: an overview of the AACR Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) Data analytics for real-world data integration in TKI-treated NSCLC patients using electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1